Allogen Laboratories Transplant Center.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013 Dec;32(12):1241-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2013.08.014. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
Ventricular assist devices (VADs) are increasingly being used as a bridge to transplantation and have been implicated as a risk factor for allosensitization to human leukocyte antigens (HLA). We investigate the association between VAD and allosensitization to human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and major-histocompatibility-complex (MHC) class I-related Chain A (MICA) antigens.
We considered all patients who received a VAD at our institution between 2000 and 2009; 89 of them had pre-VAD and post-VAD (≤6 months after implant) HLA antibody screening. A control group of non-VAD heart transplant candidates was constructed with at least 2 pre-transplant panel-reactive antibody (PRA) tests within 8 months. Two controls were randomly selected/VAD patient matched for year (n = 178). Patients and controls with available sera from these time-points were tested by Luminex/flow PRA single-antigen beads and by MICA antibody Luminex single-antigen beads. Medical records were reviewed for comparison of pre-transplant immunologic risk factors and post-transplant outcomes between the 2 groups.
Compared with controls, VAD patients had greater Class I differences between peak and initial PRA (18% vs. 0%, p < 0.0001) and higher peak PRA (24% vs. 6%, p < 0.0001). The differences between the 2 groups in Class II were less pronounced than in Class I. Of patients who had single-antigen testing, VAD implantation was significantly associated with development of new HLA antibody specificities (Class I and/or Class II) post-VAD with an increase in calculated PRA (cPRA) post-VAD compared with controls (16% vs. 0%, p < 0.0001). This risk was still present after adjusting for age, gender, pre-VAD PRA, transfusion and duration of follow-up in a multivariate analysis (p < 0.0001 and 0.02, respectively). There were no differences in development of MICA antibodies between the 2 groups (14% in both). There was no significant difference in the incidence of pre-transplant positive T-cell crossmatch, pre-transplant donor-specific HLA antibodies, rejection episodes or graft survival between the 2 groups.
Our results suggest that VAD is associated with significant HLA allosensitization independent of common risk factors.
心室辅助装置(VAD)越来越多地被用作移植的桥梁,并被认为是人类白细胞抗原(HLA)同种致敏的危险因素。我们研究了 VAD 与人类白细胞抗原(HLA)和主要组织相容性复合体(MHC)I 类相关链 A(MICA)抗原的同种致敏之间的关联。
我们考虑了 2000 年至 2009 年期间在我们机构接受 VAD 的所有患者;其中 89 例在 VAD 前和 VAD 后(植入后≤6 个月)进行了 HLA 抗体筛查。使用至少在 8 个月内进行了 2 次移植前面板反应性抗体(PRA)检测的非 VAD 心脏移植候选者构建了对照组。随机选择 2 个对照/VAD 患者与年份匹配(n = 178)。对这些时间点有可用血清的患者和对照者进行 Luminex/流式 PRA 单抗原珠和 MICA 抗体 Luminex 单抗原珠检测。回顾医疗记录,比较两组患者移植前免疫危险因素和移植后结局。
与对照组相比,VAD 患者的峰值和初始 PRA 之间的 Class I 差异更大(18% vs. 0%,p < 0.0001),且峰值 PRA 更高(24% vs. 6%,p < 0.0001)。两组之间的 Class II 差异不如 Class I 明显。在进行了单抗原检测的患者中,与对照组相比,VAD 植入与 VAD 后新的 HLA 抗体特异性(Class I 和/或 Class II)的发展相关,并且 VAD 后计算的 PRA(cPRA)增加(16% vs. 0%,p < 0.0001)。在多变量分析中,调整年龄、性别、VAD 前 PRA、输血和随访时间后,这种风险仍然存在(分别为 p < 0.0001 和 0.02)。两组之间的 MICA 抗体发展无差异(两组均为 14%)。两组之间的移植前阳性 T 细胞交叉匹配、移植前供体特异性 HLA 抗体、排斥反应发作或移植物存活率均无显著差异。
我们的结果表明,VAD 与 HLA 同种异体致敏显著相关,而与常见危险因素无关。