• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚和新西兰铁路行业中驾驶员分神和注意力不集中的心理因素。

Psychological factors for driver distraction and inattention in the Australian and New Zealand rail industry.

机构信息

Central Queensland University, Australia; CRC for Rail Innovation, Australia.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Nov;60:193-204. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.08.022. Epub 2013 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2013.08.022
PMID:24076301
Abstract

A signal passed at danger (SPAD) event occurs when a train moves past a stop signal into a section of unauthorised track. SPAD events are frequently attributed to driver distraction and inattention, but few studies have explored the failure mode from the perspective of task demand and the ability of the driver to self-regulate in response to competing activities. This study aimed to provide a more informed understanding of distraction, inattention and SPAD-risk in the passenger rail task. The research approach combined focus groups with a generative task designed to stimulate situational insight. Twenty-eight train drivers participated from 8 different rail operators in Australia and New Zealand. Data were analysed thematically and revealed several moderating factors for driver distraction. Time-keeping pressure and certain aspects of the driver-controller dynamic were considered to distort performance, and distractions from station dwelling and novel events increased SPAD-risk. The results are conceptualised in a succinct model of distraction linking multiple factors with mechanisms that induced the attentional shift. The commonalities and inter-dynamics of the factors revealed insight into driving anxiety in the passenger rail mode, and suggested that SPAD-risk was intensified when three or more factors converged. The paper discusses these issues in the context of misappropriated attention, taxonomic implications, and directions for future research.

摘要

当列车驶过停车信号进入未经授权的轨道区段时,就会发生危险信号通过(SPAD)事件。SPAD 事件通常归因于驾驶员分心和注意力不集中,但很少有研究从任务需求和驾驶员在应对竞争活动时自我调节的能力的角度探讨故障模式。本研究旨在更深入地了解客运铁路任务中的分心、注意力不集中和 SPAD 风险。该研究方法结合了焦点小组和生成任务,旨在激发情境洞察力。来自澳大利亚和新西兰 8 家不同铁路运营商的 28 名列车驾驶员参与了研究。数据进行了主题分析,揭示了驾驶员分心的几个调节因素。守时压力和驾驶员-控制器动态的某些方面被认为会扭曲性能,而来自车站停留和新事件的干扰会增加 SPAD 风险。这些结果被概念化为一个简洁的分心模型,将多个因素与引起注意力转移的机制联系起来。这些因素的共性和相互动态揭示了客运铁路模式下驾驶焦虑的洞察力,并表明当三个或更多因素汇聚时,SPAD 风险会加剧。本文在注意力不当、分类学意义以及未来研究方向的背景下讨论了这些问题。

相似文献

1
Psychological factors for driver distraction and inattention in the Australian and New Zealand rail industry.澳大利亚和新西兰铁路行业中驾驶员分神和注意力不集中的心理因素。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Nov;60:193-204. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.08.022. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
2
Causes, consequences and countermeasures to driver fatigue in the rail industry: The train driver perspective.铁路行业中驾驶员疲劳的原因、后果及应对措施:火车驾驶员视角
Appl Ergon. 2017 Apr;60:12-21. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.10.009. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
3
Investigating the formal countermeasures and informal strategies used to mitigate SPAD risk in train driving.调查用于降低火车驾驶中信号故障风险的正式对策和非正式策略。
Ergonomics. 2015;58(6):883-96. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.1001448. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
4
Getting mixed signals: Connotations of teamwork as performance shaping factors in network controller and rail driver relationship dynamics.收到混杂信号:网络控制器与铁路驾驶员关系动态中作为绩效塑造因素的团队合作内涵。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Jan;82:102976. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102976. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
5
Driver inattention and driver distraction in serious casualty crashes: data from the Australian National Crash In-depth Study.严重伤亡事故中的驾驶员注意力不集中和驾驶员分神:来自澳大利亚国家深入事故研究的数据。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 May;54:99-107. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.043. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
6
Understanding the visual skills and strategies of train drivers in the urban rail environment.了解城市轨道交通环境中列车司机的视觉技能和策略。
Work. 2014 Jan 1;47(3):339-52. doi: 10.3233/WOR-131705.
7
The impact of driver distraction on road safety: results from a representative survey in two Australian states.驾驶员注意力分散对道路安全的影响:澳大利亚两个州的代表性调查结果。
Inj Prev. 2006 Aug;12(4):242-7. doi: 10.1136/ip.2006.012336.
8
The impact of texting on driver behaviour at rail level crossings.文本信息对铁路平交道口驾驶员行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Sep;118:269-276. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 May 21.
9
Exploring inattention and distraction in the SafetyNet Accident Causation Database.探索 SafetyNet 事故致因数据库中的注意力不集中和分心现象。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Nov;60:445-55. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.03.031. Epub 2012 Apr 21.
10
Driver performance modelling and its practical application to railway safety.驾驶员性能建模及其在铁路安全中的实际应用。
Appl Ergon. 2005 Nov;36(6):661-70. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.07.005. Epub 2005 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Eye movement predictors of hazard response performance in train drivers under different speed conditions.不同速度条件下火车司机危险反应性能的眼动预测指标
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 5;15(1):24024. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09008-9.
2
Psychophysiology of Monotonous Driving, Fatigue and Sleepiness in Train and Non-Professional Drivers: Driver Safety Implications.火车司机和非职业司机单调驾驶、疲劳与困倦的心理生理学:对驾驶员安全的影响
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Sep 22;13(10):788. doi: 10.3390/bs13100788.
3
Types, Risk Factors, Consequences, and Detection Methods of Train Driver Fatigue and Distraction.
驾驶员疲劳与分神的类型、风险因素、后果及检测方法。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Mar 24;2022:8328077. doi: 10.1155/2022/8328077. eCollection 2022.
4
The Essence of Care: Versatility as an Adaptive Response to Challenges in the Delivery of Quality Aged Care by Personal Care Attendants.关怀的本质:个人护理员在提供优质老年护理服务时,作为应对挑战的适应性反应的多功能性。
Hum Factors. 2022 Feb;64(1):109-125. doi: 10.1177/00187208211010962. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
5
Health-Related Quality of Life and Associated Factors of Frontline Railway Workers: A Cross-Sectional Survey in the Ankang Area, Shaanxi Province, China.铁路一线职工的健康相关生活质量及其相关因素:中国陕西省安康地区的横断面调查
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Nov 30;13(12):1192. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13121192.