• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单侧与双侧球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折。

Unilateral versus bilateral balloon kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

机构信息

The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Pain Physician. 2013 Sep-Oct;16(5):447-53.

PMID:24077191
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) commonly occur in aged people. Balloon kyphoplasty (KP) has been proven to be efficacious for pain relief and reduction of vertebral height for patients with osteoporotic VCFs. However, very little is known about the comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes between unilateral and bilateral balloon KP in treating this kind of patients.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and long-term radiographic and clinical outcomes of unilateral or bilateral balloon KP to treat patients with osteoporotic VCFs.

STUDY DESIGN

A systemic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the analgesic efficacy, radiographic outcomes, and complications between unilateral and bilateral balloon KP in patients with osteoporotic VCFs.

SETTING

The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Pubmed, CINAHL databases, Bandolier, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were systematically searched for evidence from their inception to July 2012 by 2 of the authors (J.L. and L.Z.).

METHODS

Relevant reports were reviewed by 2 assessors independently and the reference lists of retrieved papers were scrutinized to identify further studies for inclusion, using guidelines set by PRISMA statement criteria.

RESULTS

Three RCTs were enrolled in this study. The VAS scores showed no statistical difference between the groups before surgery and either at short-term or long-term follow-up. There was no statistical significance in polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) leakage between the groups. Analysis of 2 studies showed statistical significance in surgery time (WMD -23.77 [-27.83, -19.71]; P < 0.00001) and PMMA (WMD -1.65 [-2.28, -1.02]; P < 0.00001) consumption between the groups.

LIMITATIONS

There were few data sources from which to extract abstracted data or published studies. There were only 3 RCTs that met criteria enrollment in this meta-analysis. The quality of these trials was quite low (Jadad score: 1-2). Variable reporting of end points and inconsistent definitions meant that we were not able to include every study for each outcome. There was also clinical heterogeneity among the studies.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of both unilateral and bilateral balloon KP to provide rapid, significant, and sustained pain relief for patients with osteoporotic VCFs is validated. Unilateral balloon KP is a reasonable treatment for patients with osteoporotic VCFs considering that it could achieve equivalent pain relief with less surgery time and PMMA consumption compared to bilateral balloon KP. There was no evidence to prove that unilateral balloon KP results in higher incidence of PMMA leakage than bilateral balloon KP. Although unilateral balloon KP was less efficacious in the reduction of fractured vertebral body, it is still unclear if the clinical results of balloon KP were positively correlated with the restoration of vertebral height and amount.

摘要

背景

骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(VCF)常见于老年人。球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术(KP)已被证明对缓解疼痛和恢复椎体高度有效治疗骨质疏松性 VCF 患者。然而,关于单侧和双侧球囊 KP 在治疗此类患者的临床和影像学结果比较,知之甚少。

目的

比较单侧和双侧球囊 KP 治疗骨质疏松性 VCF 患者的安全性和长期影像学及临床结果。

研究设计

对所有比较单侧和双侧球囊 KP 在骨质疏松性 VCF 患者中止痛效果、影像学结果和并发症的随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统评价和荟萃分析。

设置

作者(J.L.和 L.Z.)通过 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Pubmed、CINAHL 数据库、Bandolier 和 Cochrane 对照试验登记处,从成立之初到 2012 年 7 月系统地搜索证据。

方法

两名评估员独立审查相关报告,并仔细审查检索文献的参考文献,以根据 PRISMA 声明标准确定其他纳入研究。

结果

本研究纳入了 3 项 RCT。两组患者术前、短期和长期随访的 VAS 评分均无统计学差异。两组之间聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)渗漏无统计学意义。对 2 项研究的分析显示,手术时间有统计学意义(WMD -23.77 [-27.83,-19.71];P < 0.00001)和 PMMA(WMD -1.65 [-2.28,-1.02];P < 0.00001)消耗有统计学意义。

局限性

从提取摘要数据或已发表研究的数据源很少。这项荟萃分析只符合标准纳入了 3 项 RCT。这些试验的质量相当低(Jadad 评分:1-2)。终点报告的变量和不一致的定义意味着我们无法为每个结果纳入每一项研究。研究之间也存在临床异质性。

结论

单侧和双侧球囊 KP 均可迅速、显著、持续缓解骨质疏松性 VCF 患者的疼痛,这已得到验证。单侧球囊 KP 是骨质疏松性 VCF 患者的一种合理治疗方法,因为与双侧球囊 KP 相比,它可以在手术时间和 PMMA 消耗更少的情况下达到等效的止痛效果。没有证据表明单侧球囊 KP 会导致 PMMA 渗漏的发生率高于双侧球囊 KP。尽管单侧球囊 KP 在减少骨折椎体方面的效果较差,但仍不清楚球囊 KP 的临床结果是否与椎体高度和数量的恢复呈正相关。

相似文献

1
Unilateral versus bilateral balloon kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.单侧与双侧球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折。
Pain Physician. 2013 Sep-Oct;16(5):447-53.
2
Unilateral versus bilateral balloon kyphoplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.单侧与双侧球囊后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折
Orthopedics. 2014 Sep;37(9):e828-35. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20140825-61.
3
Can Unilateral Kyphoplasty Replace Bilateral Kyphoplasty in Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.单侧椎体后凸成形术能否替代双侧椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折?一项系统评价与Meta分析
Pain Physician. 2016 Nov-Dec;19(8):551-563.
4
Kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty: restoration of vertebral body height and correction of kyphotic deformity with special attention to the shape of the fractured vertebrae.椎体后凸成形术与椎体成形术:椎体高度的恢复及后凸畸形的矫正,特别关注骨折椎体的形态
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012 Aug;25(6):338-44. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318224a6e6.
5
Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of patients with osteoporosis vertebral compression fracture (OVCF): a systematic review and meta-analysis.单侧与双侧经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCF)患者的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Nov;25(11):3439-3449. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4395-6. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
6
Comparison of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty and Balloon Kyphoplasty for the Treatment of Single Level Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Meta-analysis of the Literature.经皮椎体成形术与球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术治疗单节段椎体压缩骨折的比较:文献的Meta分析
Pain Physician. 2015 May-Jun;18(3):209-22.
7
Balloon kyphoplasty: an evidence-based analysis.球囊椎体后凸成形术:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2004;4(12):1-45. Epub 2004 Dec 1.
8
The Role of Unilateral Balloon Kyphoplasty for the Treatment of Patients with OVCFS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.单侧球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术治疗 OVCFS 患者的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pain Physician. 2018 May;21(3):209-218.
9
Balloon kyphoplasty or percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.球囊后凸成形术与经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折?一项更新的系统评价与Meta分析。
Ann Saudi Med. 2016 May-Jun;36(3):165-74. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2016.165.
10
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of unilateral versus bilateral kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.一项关于单侧与双侧经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pain Physician. 2013 Jul-Aug;16(4):277-90.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantitative Comparison of Vertebral Structural Changes After Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Between Unilateral Extrapedicular Approach and Bilateral Transpedicular Approach Using Voxel-Based Morphometry.基于体素形态测量法对经皮椎体成形术后单侧椎弓根外入路与双侧椎弓根入路椎体结构变化的定量比较
Neurospine. 2023 Dec;20(4):1287-1302. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346536.268. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
2
Comparison of efficacies of unipedicular kyphoplasty and bipedicular kyphoplasty for treatment of single-level osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A STROBE-compliant retrospective study.单侧椎弓根椎体后凸成形术与双侧椎弓根椎体后凸成形术治疗单节段骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的疗效比较:一项符合STROBE标准的回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Sep 18;99(38):e22046. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022046.
3
Unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses.单侧与双侧经皮球囊椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折:重叠荟萃分析的系统评价
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(33):e11968. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011968.
4
Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of patients with osteoporosis vertebral compression fracture (OVCF): a systematic review and meta-analysis.单侧与双侧经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCF)患者的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Nov;25(11):3439-3449. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4395-6. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
5
Is unilateral kyphoplasty as effective and safe as bilateral kyphoplasties for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures? A meta-analysis.单侧椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折与双侧椎体后凸成形术相比,在有效性和安全性上是否相当?一项荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Sep;472(9):2833-42. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3745-0. Epub 2014 Jun 26.