• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PROCESS 研究:评估一项干预措施在乌干达托罗罗提升公共卫生中心实施、作用机制和背景的方案。

The PROCESS study: a protocol to evaluate the implementation, mechanisms of effect and context of an intervention to enhance public health centres in Tororo, Uganda.

机构信息

Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, WC1H 9SH, London, UK.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2013 Sep 30;8:113. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-113.

DOI:10.1186/1748-5908-8-113
PMID:24079992
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3849653/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite significant investments into health improvement programmes in Uganda, health indicators and access to healthcare remain poor across the country. The PRIME trial aims to evaluate the impact of a complex intervention delivered in public health centres on health outcomes of children and management of malaria in rural Uganda. The intervention consists of four components: Health Centre Management; Fever Case Management; Patient- Centered Services; and support for supplies of malaria diagnostics and antimalarial drugs.

METHODS

The PROCESS study will use mixed methods to evaluate the processes, mechanisms of change, and context of the PRIME intervention by addressing five objectives. First, to develop a comprehensive logic model of the intervention, articulating the project's hypothesised pathways to trial outcomes. Second, to evaluate the implementation of the intervention, including health worker training, health centre management tools, and the supply of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria. Third, to understand mechanisms of change of the intervention components, including testing hypotheses and interpreting realities of the intervention, including resistance, in context. Fourth, to develop a contextual record over time of factors that may have affected implementation of the intervention, mechanisms of change, and trial outcomes, including factors at population, health centre and district levels. Fifth, to capture broader expected and unexpected impacts of the intervention and trial activities among community members, health centre workers, and private providers. Methods will include intervention logic mapping, questionnaires, recorded consultations, in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and contextual data documentation.

DISCUSSION

The findings of this PROCESS study will be interpreted alongside the PRIME trial results. This will enable a greater ability to generalise the findings of the main trial. The investigators will attempt to assess which methods are most informative in such evaluations of complex interventions in low-resource settings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01024426.

摘要

背景

尽管乌干达在改善健康状况的项目上投入了大量资金,但该国的健康指标和获得医疗保健的机会仍然很差。PRIME 试验旨在评估在公共卫生中心实施的一项复杂干预措施对乌干达农村儿童健康结果和疟疾管理的影响。该干预措施由四个部分组成:卫生中心管理;发热病例管理;以患者为中心的服务;以及支持疟疾诊断和抗疟药物的供应。

方法

PROCESS 研究将采用混合方法评估 PRIME 干预措施的过程、变化机制和背景,以实现五个目标。首先,制定干预措施的综合逻辑模型,阐明项目对试验结果的假设途径。其次,评估干预措施的实施情况,包括卫生工作者培训、卫生中心管理工具以及青蒿素-哌喹(AL)和疟疾快速诊断检测试剂(RDTs)的供应。第三,了解干预措施各组成部分的变化机制,包括检验假设和解释干预措施的现实情况,包括在背景下的阻力。第四,随着时间的推移,建立一个可能影响干预措施实施、变化机制和试验结果的因素的背景记录,包括人口、卫生中心和地区各级的因素。第五,了解干预措施和试验活动对社区成员、卫生中心工作人员和私人提供者的预期和意外影响。方法将包括干预措施逻辑映射、问卷调查、记录咨询、深入访谈、焦点小组讨论和背景数据记录。

讨论

该 PROCESS 研究的结果将与 PRIME 试验结果一起解释。这将使人们能够更好地概括主要试验的结果。研究人员将尝试评估在资源匮乏的环境中评估复杂干预措施时哪些方法最具信息性。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov,NCT01024426。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e90c/3849653/a958b46f1299/1748-5908-8-113-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e90c/3849653/12656ba26b62/1748-5908-8-113-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e90c/3849653/a958b46f1299/1748-5908-8-113-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e90c/3849653/12656ba26b62/1748-5908-8-113-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e90c/3849653/a958b46f1299/1748-5908-8-113-2.jpg

相似文献

1
The PROCESS study: a protocol to evaluate the implementation, mechanisms of effect and context of an intervention to enhance public health centres in Tororo, Uganda.PROCESS 研究:评估一项干预措施在乌干达托罗罗提升公共卫生中心实施、作用机制和背景的方案。
Implement Sci. 2013 Sep 30;8:113. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-113.
2
The PRIME trial protocol: evaluating the impact of an intervention implemented in public health centres on management of malaria and health outcomes of children using a cluster-randomised design in Tororo, Uganda.PRIME 试验方案:在乌干达托罗罗的公共卫生中心实施干预措施,评估其对疟疾管理和儿童健康结果的影响,采用整群随机设计。
Implement Sci. 2013 Sep 30;8:114. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-114.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Challenging logics of complex intervention trials: community perspectives of a health care improvement intervention in rural Uganda.复杂干预试验的挑战性逻辑:乌干达农村地区医疗保健改善干预措施的社区观点
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Apr;131:10-7. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.02.032. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
5
Behind the scenes of the PRIME intervention: designing a complex intervention to improve malaria care at public health centres in Uganda.PRIME 干预措施的幕后故事:设计一项复杂干预措施以改善乌干达公共卫生中心的疟疾护理。
Glob Health Action. 2015 Oct 23;8:29067. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.29067. eCollection 2015.
6
The impact of an intervention to introduce malaria rapid diagnostic tests on fever case management in a high transmission setting in Uganda: A mixed-methods cluster-randomized trial (PRIME).在乌干达高传播地区引入疟疾快速诊断检测对发热病例管理的干预影响:一项混合方法整群随机试验(PRIME)
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 13;12(3):e0170998. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170998. eCollection 2017.
7
The Impact of an Intervention to Improve Malaria Care in Public Health Centers on Health Indicators of Children in Tororo, Uganda (PRIME): A Cluster-Randomized Trial.一项旨在改善乌干达托罗罗公共卫生中心疟疾护理的干预措施对儿童健康指标的影响(PRIME):一项整群随机试验。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Aug 3;95(2):358-367. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0103. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
8
Opening the 'black box' of collaborative improvement: a qualitative evaluation of a pilot intervention to improve quality of malaria surveillance data in public health centres in Uganda.打开合作改进的“黑箱”:乌干达公共卫生中心改善疟疾监测数据质量试点干预的定性评估。
Malar J. 2021 Jun 29;20(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03805-z.
9
Community and District Empowerment for Scale-up (CODES): a complex district-level management intervention to improve child survival in Uganda: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.社区与地区赋权促进扩大规模(CODES):乌干达一项旨在改善儿童生存状况的复杂地区层面管理干预措施:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Mar 11;17(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1241-4.
10
Programme level implementation of malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) use: outcomes and cost of training health workers at lower level health care facilities in Uganda.疟疾快速诊断检测(RDT)在项目层面的实施:乌干达较低级别医疗保健机构培训卫生工作者的结果和成本。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Apr 20;12:291. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-291.

引用本文的文献

1
Taking Opportunities, Taking Medicines: Antibiotic Use in Rural Eastern Uganda.抓住机会,合理用药:乌干达东部农村的抗生素使用情况。
Med Anthropol. 2022 May-Jun;41(4):418-430. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2022.2047676. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
2
The Community Lab of Ideas for Health: Community-Based Transdisciplinary Solutions in a Malaria Elimination Trial in The Gambia.社区卫生创意实验室:冈比亚消除疟疾试验中的基于社区的跨学科解决方案。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jul 20;9:637714. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.637714. eCollection 2021.
3
Process Evaluation of a Community-Based Microbial Larviciding Intervention for Malaria Control in Rural Tanzania.

本文引用的文献

1
The PRIME trial protocol: evaluating the impact of an intervention implemented in public health centres on management of malaria and health outcomes of children using a cluster-randomised design in Tororo, Uganda.PRIME 试验方案:在乌干达托罗罗的公共卫生中心实施干预措施,评估其对疟疾管理和儿童健康结果的影响,采用整群随机设计。
Implement Sci. 2013 Sep 30;8:114. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-114.
2
Aspirations for quality health care in Uganda: How do we get there?乌干达对高质量医疗保健的期望:我们如何实现?
Hum Resour Health. 2013 Mar 22;11:13. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-11-13.
3
Realist randomised controlled trials: a new approach to evaluating complex public health interventions.
坦桑尼亚农村地区以社区为基础的微生物灭蚊干预措施的效果评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 7;17(19):7309. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197309.
4
"Patients are not the same, so we cannot treat them the same" - A qualitative content analysis of provider, patient and implementer perspectives on differentiated service delivery models for HIV treatment in South Africa.“患者各不相同,因此我们不能对他们一视同仁”——南非针对艾滋病毒治疗提供差异化服务模式的提供者、患者和实施者的观点定性内容分析。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2020 Jun;23(6):e25544. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25544.
5
Implementing a toolkit for the prevention, management and control of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in English acute hospitals trusts: a qualitative evaluation.在英国急症医院信托基金中实施用于预防、管理和控制产碳青霉烯酶肠杆菌科的工具包:定性评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 12;19(1):689. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4492-4.
6
Examining Intervention Design: Lessons from the Development of Eight Related Malaria Health Care Intervention Studies.审视干预设计:八项相关疟疾医疗保健干预研究的发展经验教训
Health Syst Reform. 2016 Oct 1;2(4):373-388. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2016.1179086. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
7
Contextual factors in maternal and newborn health evaluation: a protocol applied in Nigeria, India and Ethiopia.孕产妇和新生儿健康评估中的背景因素:一项在尼日利亚、印度和埃塞俄比亚应用的方案
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2018 Feb 6;15:2. doi: 10.1186/s12982-018-0071-0. eCollection 2018.
8
Disentangling the effects of a multiple behaviour change intervention for diarrhoea control in Zambia: a theory-based process evaluation.解析赞比亚一项控制腹泻的多行为改变干预措施的效果:基于理论的过程评估
Global Health. 2017 Oct 17;13(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12992-017-0302-0.
9
Organizational theory for dissemination and implementation research.传播与实施研究的组织理论
Implement Sci. 2017 May 12;12(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0592-x.
10
The impact of an intervention to introduce malaria rapid diagnostic tests on fever case management in a high transmission setting in Uganda: A mixed-methods cluster-randomized trial (PRIME).在乌干达高传播地区引入疟疾快速诊断检测对发热病例管理的干预影响:一项混合方法整群随机试验(PRIME)
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 13;12(3):e0170998. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170998. eCollection 2017.
现实主义随机对照试验:一种评估复杂公共卫生干预措施的新方法。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Dec;75(12):2299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.08.032. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
4
Assessing health system interventions: key points when considering the value of randomization.评估卫生系统干预措施:考虑随机化价值时的要点。
Bull World Health Organ. 2011 Dec 1;89(12):907-12. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.089524. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
5
Quality assurance of qualitative research: a review of the discourse.定性研究的质量保证:话语的回顾。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2011 Dec 19;9:43. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-9-43.
6
Progress towards Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5 on maternal and child mortality: an updated systematic analysis.孕产妇和儿童死亡率方面千年发展目标 4 和 5 的进展:更新的系统分析。
Lancet. 2011 Sep 24;378(9797):1139-65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61337-8. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
7
Countdown to 2015 decade report (2000-10): taking stock of maternal, newborn, and child survival.2015 倒计时十年报告(2000-2010 年):评估孕产妇、新生儿和儿童生存状况。
Lancet. 2010 Jun 5;375(9730):2032-44. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60678-2.
8
Evaluating delivery systems: complex evaluations and plausibility inference.评估输送系统:复杂评估与似然推理。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Apr;82(4):672-7. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0473.
9
Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study.在复杂医疗保健干预措施的随机对照试验中运用定性方法:方法学研究
BMJ. 2009 Sep 10;339:b3496. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3496.
10
Motivation, money and respect: a mixed-method study of Tanzanian non-physician clinicians.动机、金钱与尊重:一项关于坦桑尼亚非医师临床医生的混合方法研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Jun;68(11):2078-88. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.03.007. Epub 2009 Mar 28.