Department of Public Health, Unit of Socio-Ecological Health Research, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Front Public Health. 2021 Jul 20;9:637714. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.637714. eCollection 2021.
Community participation in global health interventions may improve outcomes and solve complex health issues. Although numerous community participatory approaches have been developed and introduced, there has been little focus on "how" and "who" to involve in the implementation of community-based clinical trials where unequal distribution of power between implementers and communities pre-exists. Addressing to achieve community-based solutions in a malaria elimination trial in The Gambia, we developed the Community Lab of Ideas for Health (CLIH): a participatory approach that enabled communities to shape trial implementation. As part of transdisciplinary research, we conducted qualitative research with in-depth interviews, discussions, and observations in 17 villages in the North Bank Region of The Gambia between March 2016 and December 2017. We designed an iterative research process involving ethnography, stakeholder-analysis, participatory-discussions, and qualitative monitoring and evaluation, whereby each step guided the next. We drew upon ethnographic results and stakeholder-analysis to identify key-informants who became participants in study design and implementation. The participatory-discussions provided a co-creative space for sharing community-centric ideas to tackle trial implementation challenges. The proposed strategies for trial implementation were continuously refined and improved through our monitoring and evaluation. The CLIH incorporated communities' insights, to co-create tailored trial implementation strategies including: village health workers prescribing and distributing antimalarial treatments; "compounds" as community-accepted treatment units; medicine distribution following compound micro-politics; and appropriate modes of health message delivery. Throughout the iterative research process, the researchers and communities set the common goal, namely to curtail the by reducing malaria transmission and the burden thereof. This innovative collaborative process built trust among stakeholders and fully engaged researchers and communities in co-creation and co-implementation of the trial. The CLIH approach succeeded in touching the local realities by incorporating a spectrum of perspectives from community-members and discerning project-derived knowledge from local-knowledge. This process allowed us to co-develop locally-oriented solutions and ultimately to co-establish an intervention structure that community-members were ready and willing to use, which resulted in high uptake of the intervention (92% adherence to treatment). Successfully, the CLIH contributed in bridging research and implementation.
社区参与全球卫生干预措施可以改善成果并解决复杂的健康问题。尽管已经开发并引入了许多社区参与方法,但在实施社区为基础的临床试验时,针对“如何”和“涉及谁”参与的问题关注甚少,因为在这些试验中,实施者和社区之间已经存在权力分配不均的问题。为了在冈比亚的一项疟疾消除试验中找到基于社区的解决方案,我们开发了社区健康创意实验室(CLIH):这是一种参与式方法,使社区能够塑造试验实施。作为跨学科研究的一部分,我们于 2016 年 3 月至 2017 年 12 月在冈比亚北岸地区的 17 个村庄进行了深入访谈、讨论和观察的定性研究。我们设计了一个迭代研究过程,涉及民族志、利益相关者分析、参与式讨论和定性监测和评估,每个步骤都指导着下一步。我们借鉴民族志结果和利益相关者分析,确定了成为研究设计和实施参与者的主要知情人。参与式讨论为分享以社区为中心的想法以解决试验实施挑战提供了一个共同创造的空间。通过我们的监测和评估,不断改进和完善试验实施的建议策略。CLIH 纳入了社区的见解,共同创造了定制的试验实施策略,包括:村庄卫生工作者开具和分发抗疟治疗药物;“化合物”作为社区认可的治疗单位;根据化合物的微观政治进行药物分发;以及适当的健康信息传递模式。在整个迭代研究过程中,研究人员和社区设定了一个共同目标,即通过减少疟疾传播及其负担来遏制疟疾。这一创新的协作过程在利益相关者之间建立了信任,并使研究人员和社区充分参与共同创造和试验的共同实施。CLIH 方法通过纳入社区成员的各种观点并从项目知识中辨别出本地知识,成功地触及了当地现实。这一过程使我们能够共同制定以社区为导向的解决方案,并最终共同建立一个社区成员愿意使用的干预结构,从而实现了干预措施的高采用率(92%的人坚持治疗)。CLIH 成功地为研究和实施架起了桥梁。