Suppr超能文献

使用Acrodose plus系统的混合血小板产品:可行性、安全性和有效性评估。

Pooled platelet product using the Acrodose plus system: evaluation of feasibility, safety and efficacy.

作者信息

Sawant R B, Marathe A N

机构信息

Rajkot Voluntary Blood Bank and Research Centre, Rajkot, India.

出版信息

Transfus Apher Sci. 2013 Dec;49(3):535-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Sep 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pooling of whole blood-derived platelets is not practiced in India. Currently available data shows that pooled platelets are equivalent in quality and less costly when compared with apheresis platelets.

AIM

To evaluate feasibility, safety and efficacy of pooled platelets using the Acrodose Plus system.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Standardization of platelet pooling procedure was done. Sterile docking device was used to maintain closed system. Pools of ABO compatible platelets (N=40) as well as ABO incompatible (N=10) pooled platelets were studied. ABO antibody titers were studied before and after pooling in case of ABO incompatible platelet pools. Corrected count increments (CCIs) (at 1h and 24h) were noted after transfusion of pooled platelets and Apheresis platelets in matched patient groups.

RESULTS

Loss of platelet product due to pooling and leucodepletion was not statistically significant (p=0.23). Leucodepletion >3 log was achieved in all pooled platelets. The total platelet content, time taken for procedure and pH were within acceptable limits. There were no issues related to platelet availability and turn around time during the study period. There was a reduction in the ABO antibody titers after pooling in case of the ABO incompatible pools. None of the pooled platelets showed evidence of bacterial contamination on testing with eBDS system at 18 h and 24h intervals after pooling. CCI with pooled platelets was equivalent to that with apheresis platelets at 1h (p=0.36) and 24h (p=0.15).

CONCLUSION

Whole blood derived platelets can be pooled safely using closed system without altering the platelet quality in vitro as well as in vivo survival post transfusion. Pooled platelets can be a cost effective and safe alternative to thrombocytopenic patients whose transfusion requirements cannot be fulfilled with apheresis platelets alone.

摘要

背景

印度不采用全血来源血小板的汇集做法。现有数据表明,与单采血小板相比,汇集血小板在质量上相当且成本更低。

目的

使用Acrodose Plus系统评估汇集血小板的可行性、安全性和有效性。

材料与方法

对血小板汇集程序进行标准化。使用无菌对接装置维持封闭系统。研究了ABO血型相容的血小板池(N = 40)以及ABO血型不相容的血小板池(N = 10)。对于ABO血型不相容的血小板池,在汇集前后研究ABO抗体效价。在匹配的患者组中输注汇集血小板和单采血小板后,记录校正计数增加值(CCI)(1小时和24小时时)。

结果

由于汇集和白细胞去除导致的血小板产品损失无统计学意义(p = 0.23)。所有汇集血小板的白细胞去除率均>3 log。总血小板含量、操作所需时间和pH值均在可接受范围内。在研究期间,血小板可用性和周转时间方面没有问题。对于ABO血型不相容的血小板池,汇集后ABO抗体效价有所降低。在汇集后18小时和24小时间隔使用eBDS系统检测时,没有汇集血小板显示出细菌污染的迹象。汇集血小板的CCI在1小时(p = 0.36)和24小时(p = 0.15)时与单采血小板相当。

结论

全血来源的血小板可以使用封闭系统安全地汇集,而不会改变体外血小板质量以及输血后体内的存活率。对于仅靠单采血小板无法满足输血需求的血小板减少症患者,汇集血小板可以是一种经济有效且安全的替代选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验