Butler Robert J, Queen Robin M, Wilson Becky, Stephenson John, Barnes C Lowry
Physical Therapy Division, Duke University, Department of Orthopedics, Duke University, and the Michael W. Krzyzewski Human Performance Lab, Duke University, Durham, NC(∗).
Department of Orthopedics and the Michael W. Krzyzewski Human Performance Lab, Duke University, Durham, NC(†).
PM R. 2014 Apr;6(4):309-15; quiz 315. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.09.011. Epub 2013 Sep 28.
To examine how an extension constraint knee brace affects active and passive standing knee joint alignment, dynamic balance, and gait mechanics.
Repeated-measures, within-subjects design.
Research laboratory.
Persons (N = 24) with no current diagnosed gait dysfunction or neuromuscular limitations that limit activities of daily living.
All subjects were tested with use of dynamic balance and gait analysis. Dynamic balance was examined with the Lower Quarter Y Balance Test. Gait analysis was conducted at a freely chosen walking speed for 2 conditions: (1) use of a brace with free range of motion (FROM) and (2) use of a brace with 30-degree extension constraint (ECON). In a subset of subjects, radiographs were used to examine standing knee alignment for 3 conditions: (1) FROM, (2) use of a knee ECON brace in a relaxed position; and (3) use of a knee ECON brace with maximal volitional quadriceps contraction.
Peak knee flexion, knee flexion range of motion, peak vertical ground reaction force during weight acceptance and propulsion, and maximum reach distance in the anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral directions were measured.
Differences in dynamic balance were observed between ECON and FROM for the anterior reach. Peak knee flexion increased 3.2° and peak knee extension decreased 7.4° in the ECON condition. Vertical GRF values were found to increase bilaterally during ECON at midstance but decreased bilaterally during propulsion. Radiographic images revealed that the ECON elicited a 22.2° flexion contracture with minimal quadriceps activation but only reduced motion by 4.8° with maximal volitional quadriceps activation.
Extension constraint knee braces alter joint alignment, dynamic balance, knee mechanics during gait, and vertical loading during gait. However, the changes in motion observed were lower than those induced by the constraining mechanism.
研究伸展限制型膝关节支具如何影响主动和被动站立时的膝关节对线、动态平衡及步态力学。
重复测量、受试者自身对照设计。
研究实验室。
24名目前未诊断出有影响日常生活活动的步态功能障碍或神经肌肉限制的人。
所有受试者均接受动态平衡和步态分析测试。动态平衡采用下半身Y平衡测试进行评估。步态分析在自由选择的步行速度下针对两种情况进行:(1)使用活动范围自由(FROM)的支具;(2)使用具有30度伸展限制(ECON)的支具。在部分受试者中,通过X线片检查三种情况下的站立膝关节对线:(1)FROM;(2)在放松位置使用膝关节ECON支具;(3)在股四头肌最大自主收缩时使用膝关节ECON支具。
测量膝关节最大屈曲角度、膝关节屈曲活动范围、承重和推进过程中的最大垂直地面反作用力,以及在前、后内侧和后外侧方向的最大伸展距离。
在ECON和FROM两种情况下,前向伸展的动态平衡存在差异。在ECON情况下,膝关节最大屈曲角度增加3.2°,最大伸展角度减少7.4°。发现ECON情况下双侧在支撑中期垂直地面反作用力增加,但在推进过程中双侧降低。X线片显示,ECON在股四头肌激活最小时引起22.2°的屈曲挛缩,但在股四头肌最大自主收缩时仅减少4.8°的活动度。
伸展限制型膝关节支具会改变关节对线、动态平衡、步态期间的膝关节力学以及步态期间的垂直负荷。然而,观察到的运动变化低于由限制机制引起的变化。