Maas C L, Leek B F
Vet Res Commun. 1985 Apr;9(2):89-113. doi: 10.1007/BF02215132.
The effects of opioids and naloxone on cyclical forestomach motility were determined in anaesthetized and conscious sheep. To assess central or peripheral opioid actions, differential routes of administration were used. Possible dynamic effects along the innervating vagovagal reflex arc were investigated electrophysiologically at the cervical level of the vagus nerve. Further, direct influences on the smooth muscle were evaluated in vitro on isolated longitudinal reticular strips. Additionally, the effects of some spasmogenic agents were studied for comparative purposes. In anaesthetized sheep, opioids depressed in an identical manner both the amplitude of spontaneous cyclical contractions and contractions evoked by electrical stimulation of the distal end of the cut cervical vagus. In conscious sheep, low doses of normorphine and loperamide inhibited frequency and amplitude centrally (20 micrograms/kg and 4 micrograms/kg via carotid artery respectively), whereas locally higher dose levels (200 micrograms/kg and 10 micrograms/kg via coeliac artery respectively) affected only the amplitude of cyclical contractions. Furthermore the opioid peptides Leu-, Met-enkephalin and [D-Ala2-Met5]-enkephalinamide preferentially depressed the amplitude of cyclical motility most efficiently if administrated via the coeliac artery. These results indicate the presence both of a central opioid action depressing frequency and amplitude and of a local opioid action depressing only the amplitude of cyclical reticulo-ruminal motility. Opioids did not alter the resting discharge of afferent tension units and similarly failed to modulate tone of reticular strips in vitro, suggesting that the opioids act locally on the intramural neuronal plexus, possibly by diminishing the output of excitatory transmitter. Whether substance P could play a role as a vagal excitatory transmitter besides the classically implicated acetylcholine has been discussed. The central opioid mechanism is probably not situated within the gastric centres but elsewhere in the brain. Naloxone (greater than or equal to 100 micrograms/kg, jugular vein) stimulated the frequency of cyclical ruminal motility only in well-defined experimental conditions, probably via a central mechanism.
在麻醉和清醒的绵羊身上测定了阿片类药物和纳洛酮对周期性前胃运动的影响。为了评估中枢或外周阿片类药物的作用,采用了不同的给药途径。在迷走神经颈段水平通过电生理学方法研究了沿支配性迷走-迷走反射弧可能存在的动态效应。此外,在体外对分离的纵向网状肌条评估了对平滑肌的直接影响。另外,为了进行比较研究了一些致痉剂的作用。在麻醉的绵羊中,阿片类药物以相同方式抑制自发性周期性收缩的幅度以及由切断的颈迷走神经远端电刺激诱发的收缩幅度。在清醒的绵羊中,低剂量的去甲吗啡和洛哌丁胺分别通过颈动脉给药(20微克/千克和4微克/千克)时,在中枢抑制频率和幅度,而局部较高剂量水平(分别通过腹腔动脉给药200微克/千克和10微克/千克)仅影响周期性收缩的幅度。此外,阿片肽亮氨酸-脑啡肽、甲硫氨酸-脑啡肽和[D-丙氨酸2-甲硫氨酸5]-脑啡肽酰胺如果通过腹腔动脉给药,最有效地优先抑制周期性运动的幅度。这些结果表明存在抑制频率和幅度的中枢阿片类药物作用以及仅抑制周期性网状瘤胃运动幅度的局部阿片类药物作用。阿片类药物没有改变传入张力单位的静息放电,同样也未能在体外调节网状肌条的张力,这表明阿片类药物可能通过减少兴奋性递质的释放而局部作用于壁内神经丛。除了经典涉及的乙酰胆碱外,P物质是否可能作为迷走神经兴奋性递质发挥作用也已得到讨论。中枢阿片类药物机制可能不在胃中枢内,而是在大脑的其他部位。纳洛酮(大于或等于100微克/千克,颈静脉给药)仅在明确的实验条件下可能通过中枢机制刺激周期性瘤胃运动的频率。