• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

述评:骨质疏松症护理质量的测量。

Commentary: measuring quality of care in osteoporosis.

机构信息

Division of Rheumatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, and OMC Clinical Research Center, 8641 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 301, Beverly Hills, CA, 90211, USA,

出版信息

Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2013 Dec;11(4):338-40. doi: 10.1007/s11914-013-0176-x.

DOI:10.1007/s11914-013-0176-x
PMID:24085652
Abstract

We know improving the quality of care in osteoporosis is an important goal. We have made some strides toward measuring quality of osteoporosis care, focusing on process measures regarding care that is provided. Unfortunately, improving care as measured by these process measures does not always yield improved outcomes. We need to hold health care providers and health care systems responsible not only for health care production but for production of health and well-being. However, there is a multiplicity of factors that will need to be considered to make this next step.

摘要

我们深知提升骨质疏松症护理质量是一个重要目标。我们已经在衡量骨质疏松症护理质量方面取得了一些进展,重点关注提供护理的流程措施。遗憾的是,这些流程措施衡量的护理质量改进并不总能带来结果的改善。我们不仅需要医疗机构和医疗体系对医疗保健的产出负责,还要对健康和福祉的产出负责。然而,要迈出下一步,还需要考虑到多种因素。

相似文献

1
Commentary: measuring quality of care in osteoporosis.述评:骨质疏松症护理质量的测量。
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2013 Dec;11(4):338-40. doi: 10.1007/s11914-013-0176-x.
2
Quality health care gaps in osteoporosis: how can patients, providers, and the health system do a better job?骨质疏松症的优质医疗保健差距:患者、医疗服务提供者和医疗系统如何才能做得更好?
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2009 Mar;7(1):27-34. doi: 10.1007/s11914-009-0006-3.
3
Improving quality of care in osteoporosis: opportunities and challenges.提高骨质疏松症的护理质量:机遇与挑战。
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2008 Apr;10(2):123-30. doi: 10.1007/s11926-008-0022-9.
4
Measuring osteoporosis quality: The work of the Joint Commission.测量骨质疏松症质量:联合委员会的工作。
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2013 Dec;11(4):354-6. doi: 10.1007/s11914-013-0169-9.
5
Challenges in defining and improving osteoporosis quality of care.
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007 Nov-Dec;25(6 Suppl 47):142-6.
6
[Japanese Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis (2006 Edition) and its significance].[日本骨质疏松症防治指南(2006年版)及其意义]
Nihon Rinsho. 2007 Nov 28;65 Suppl 9:29-34.
7
Swedish osteoporosis care.瑞典骨质疏松症护理。
Arch Osteoporos. 2015;10:222. doi: 10.1007/s11657-015-0222-7. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
8
First Fracture Project: addressing the osteoporosis care gap.首个骨折项目:填补骨质疏松症护理缺口。
Intern Med J. 2007 Oct;37(10):717-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2007.01496.x.
9
Osteo-cise: strong bones for life: protocol for a community-based randomised controlled trial of a multi-modal exercise and osteoporosis education program for older adults at risk of falls and fractures.Osteo-cise:终生强健骨骼:一项针对有跌倒和骨折风险的老年人的多模式运动和骨质疏松症教育计划的基于社区的随机对照试验方案。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 May 28;13:78. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-78.
10
Barriers to effective management of osteoporosis in moderate and minimal trauma fractures: a prospective study.中度和轻度创伤性骨折中骨质疏松症有效管理的障碍:一项前瞻性研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2005 Aug;16(8):977-82. doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1788-x. Epub 2004 Nov 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring osteoporosis quality: The work of the Joint Commission.测量骨质疏松症质量:联合委员会的工作。
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2013 Dec;11(4):354-6. doi: 10.1007/s11914-013-0169-9.
2
Invited commentary: fracture follow-up program in an open healthcare system.特邀评论:开放式医疗体系中的骨折随访项目。
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2013 Dec;11(4):369-76. doi: 10.1007/s11914-013-0163-2.
3
The disconnect between better quality of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis preventive care and better outcomes: a population-based cohort study.
更好的糖皮质激素诱导性骨质疏松预防护理质量与更好结局之间的脱节:一项基于人群的队列研究。
J Rheumatol. 2013 Oct;40(10):1736-41. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130041. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
4
Best practices in secondary fracture prevention: fracture liaison services.骨折联络服务:二级预防骨折的最佳实践。
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2013 Mar;11(1):52-60. doi: 10.1007/s11914-012-0130-3.
5
FRAX updates 2012.2012 年 FRAX 更新版。
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2012 Sep;24(5):554-60. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e328356d2f5.
6
Physicians' explanations for apparent gaps in the quality of rheumatology care: results from the US Medicare Physician Quality Reporting System.风湿病学护理质量明显差距的医生解释:来自美国医疗保险医师质量报告系统的结果。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Feb;65(2):235-43. doi: 10.1002/acr.21713.
7
Adherence with intravenous zoledronate and intravenous ibandronate in the United States Medicare population.美国医疗保险人群中静脉注射唑来膦酸和静脉注射伊班膦酸的依从性。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Jul;64(7):1054-60. doi: 10.1002/acr.21638.
8
Impact of clinical fractures on health-related quality of life is dependent on time of assessment since fracture: results from the FREEDOM trial.骨折对健康相关生活质量的影响取决于骨折后评估的时间:来自 FREEDOM 试验的结果。
Osteoporos Int. 2012 Apr;23(4):1361-9. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1720-0. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
9
Compliance and persistence with osteoporosis medications: a critical review of the literature.骨质疏松症药物的依从性和持久性:文献综述。
Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2010 Dec;11(4):275-80. doi: 10.1007/s11154-010-9138-0.
10
Patient satisfaction in postmenopausal women treated with a weekly bisphosphonate transitioned to once-monthly ibandronate.接受每周双磷酸盐治疗的绝经后妇女转为每月一次伊班膦酸盐治疗后的患者满意度。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009 Jul;18(7):935-43. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2008.1064.