Korsukewitz J, Wegscheider K, Schmutzler H
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1985 Jul 12;110(28-29):1103-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1068967.
20 patients with idiopathic complex ventricular arrhythmias received propafenone 450 mg/d, disopyramide 600 mg/d and metoprolol 100 mg/d. Before commencement of the 3-week treatment period the 95% normal range for spontaneous changes in ventricular extrasystoles (VES), as couplets and runs, were determined from three 24 h-ECG recordings in each patient under drug-free conditions. A drug effect was assumed when the rate of VES/24 h for the control period decreased by greater than or equal to 83.5% or increased by greater than or equal to 505% in the test period. The frequency dependent normal range for couplets varied between a decrease from 100% to 92% (greater than or equal to 16 to greater than or equal to 44/d) and an increase from 650% to 1000% (greater than or equal to 3 to greater than or equal to 38/d) and for runs between a decrease from 100% to 85% (greater than or equal to 6 to 32/d) and an increase from 600% to 1000% (greater than or equal to 1 to 14/d). A decrease in all rhythm disturbances under the action of the 3 drugs could be shown for the whole group (P less than 0.01). On the basis of the calculated normal range, ventricular extrasystoles in the patients decreased significantly by 26-37%, couplets by 13-33% and runs by 0-55% depending to the drug. A drug dependent arrhythmogenic effect occurred in 4 patients. A preference for one or other of the drugs could not be established statistically.
20例特发性复杂性室性心律失常患者接受了如下治疗:普罗帕酮450毫克/天、丙吡胺600毫克/天以及美托洛尔100毫克/天。在为期3周的治疗期开始前,在无药状态下,通过每位患者的3次24小时心电图记录,确定室性期前收缩(VES)呈成对和连续形式时自发变化的95%正常范围。当试验期内VES/24小时的速率较对照期降低大于或等于83.5%或升高大于或等于505%时,则认为有药物效应。成对形式的频率依赖性正常范围在从100%降至92%(从大于或等于16次/天降至大于或等于44次/天)到从650%升至1000%(从大于或等于3次/天升至大于或等于38次/天)之间变化,连续形式的频率依赖性正常范围在从100%降至85%(从大于或等于6次/天降至32次/天)到从600%升至1000%(从大于或等于1次/天升至14次/天)之间变化。对于整个组可以显示出在这3种药物作用下所有心律失常均减少(P小于0.01)。根据计算出的正常范围,患者的室性期前收缩根据药物不同显著减少26% - 37%,成对形式减少13% - 33%,连续形式减少0% - 55%。4例患者出现了药物依赖性致心律失常效应。在统计学上无法确定对其中一种或另一种药物的偏好。