• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病患者正常应激心肌灌注成像的保修期:一项倾向评分分析。

Warranty period of normal stress myocardial perfusion imaging in diabetic patients: a propensity score analysis.

作者信息

Acampa Wanda, Petretta Mario, Cuocolo Renato, Daniele Stefania, Cantoni Valeria, Cuocolo Alberto

机构信息

Institute of Biostructure and Bioimaging, National Council of Research, Naples, Italy.

出版信息

J Nucl Cardiol. 2014 Feb;21(1):50-6. doi: 10.1007/s12350-013-9788-x. Epub 2013 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1007/s12350-013-9788-x
PMID:24092273
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the relationship between diabetes and temporal characteristics of cardiac risk at long-term follow-up in a propensity score-matched cohort of diabetic and non-diabetic patients with normal stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (MPS).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 828 consecutive patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease and normal perfusion at stress MPS. To account for differences in baseline characteristics between diabetics and non-diabetics, we created a propensity score-matched cohort considering clinical variables and stress type. After matching, clinical characteristics were comparable in 260 diabetic and 260 non-diabetic patients. All patients were followed for at least 1 year (median 53 months). End-point events were cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. At Cox analysis, diabetes (hazard ratio 3.9, P < .01) and post-stress left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤45% (hazard ratio 4.1, P < .01) were independent predictors of events. At parametric analysis, non-diabetic patients with post-stress LVEF >45% remained at low risk for the entire length of follow-up, while the highest probability of events and the major risk acceleration was observed in patients with diabetes and post-stress LVEF ≤45%.

CONCLUSIONS

After a normal stress MPS, diabetic patients are at higher risk for cardiac events than non-diabetic subjects also after balancing clinical characteristics and stress type by propensity score analysis. The warranty period of a normal stress MPS varies according to diabetic status and post-stress LVEF.

摘要

背景

在一个倾向评分匹配的糖尿病和非糖尿病患者队列中,我们评估了糖尿病与长期随访时心脏风险的时间特征之间的关系,这些患者的应激心肌灌注单光子发射计算机断层扫描(MPS)结果正常。

方法与结果

我们研究了828例疑似或已知冠状动脉疾病且应激MPS灌注正常的连续患者。为了考虑糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者基线特征的差异,我们根据临床变量和应激类型创建了一个倾向评分匹配队列。匹配后,260例糖尿病患者和260例非糖尿病患者的临床特征具有可比性。所有患者至少随访1年(中位时间53个月)。终点事件为心源性死亡或非致命性心肌梗死。在Cox分析中,糖尿病(风险比3.9,P <.01)和应激后左心室射血分数(LVEF)≤45%(风险比4.1,P <.01)是事件的独立预测因素。在参数分析中,应激后LVEF>45%的非糖尿病患者在整个随访期间风险较低,而糖尿病且应激后LVEF≤45%的患者事件发生概率最高且主要风险加速。

结论

在应激MPS结果正常后,通过倾向评分分析平衡临床特征和应激类型后,糖尿病患者发生心脏事件的风险仍高于非糖尿病患者。正常应激MPS的质保期根据糖尿病状态和应激后LVEF而有所不同。

相似文献

1
Warranty period of normal stress myocardial perfusion imaging in diabetic patients: a propensity score analysis.糖尿病患者正常应激心肌灌注成像的保修期:一项倾向评分分析。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2014 Feb;21(1):50-6. doi: 10.1007/s12350-013-9788-x. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
2
Warranty period of normal stress myocardial perfusion imaging in hypertensive patients: A parametric survival analysis.高血压患者正常应激心肌灌注成像的保修期:参数生存分析。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2020 Apr;27(2):534-541. doi: 10.1007/s12350-018-1285-9. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
3
Risk stratification among diabetic patients undergoing stress myocardial perfusion imaging.糖尿病患者行应激心肌灌注显像的危险分层。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2013 Aug;20(4):529-38. doi: 10.1007/s12350-013-9731-1. Epub 2013 May 24.
4
Incremental prognostic value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in asymptomatic diabetic patients.无症状糖尿病患者应激心肌灌注成像的渐进预后价值。
Atherosclerosis. 2013 Apr;227(2):307-12. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.01.011. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
5
Prevalence and predictors of ischemia and outcomes in outpatients with diabetes mellitus referred for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging.门诊糖尿病患者行单光子发射计算机断层心肌灌注显像的缺血及预后的发生率和预测因素。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 May 1;6(3):466-77. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.000259. Epub 2013 Apr 1.
6
Post-stress left ventricular ejection fraction drop in patients with diabetes: a gated myocardial perfusion imaging study.应激后糖尿病患者左心室射血分数下降:门控心肌灌注显像研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2013 Nov 14;13:99. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-13-99.
7
Warranty periods for normal myocardial perfusion stress SPECT.正常心肌灌注负荷单光子发射计算机断层扫描的保修期。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 Feb;22(1):44-54. doi: 10.1007/s12350-014-9957-6. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
8
Long-term prognostic value of low-dose normal stress-only myocardial perfusion imaging by wide beam reconstruction: A competing risk analysis.宽束重建低剂量仅静息心肌灌注成像的长期预后价值:一项竞争风险分析。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2020 Apr;27(2):547-557. doi: 10.1007/s12350-018-1373-x. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
9
Improved near-term coronary artery disease risk classification with gated stress myocardial perfusion SPECT.门控应激心肌灌注 SPECT 可改善近期冠心病风险分类。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Nov;3(11):1139-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.09.008.
10
Comparison of left ventricular shape by gated SPECT imaging in diabetic and nondiabetic patients with normal myocardial perfusion: A propensity score analysis.门控 SPECT 成像在正常心肌灌注的糖尿病和非糖尿病患者左心室形态比较:倾向评分分析。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2018 Apr;25(2):394-403. doi: 10.1007/s12350-017-1009-6. Epub 2017 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Left ventricular systolic dyssynchrony: a novel imaging marker for early assessment of myocardial damage in Chinese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction and normal myocardial perfusion.左心室收缩不同步:一种新型影像学标志物,用于评估中国 2 型糖尿病伴左心室射血分数正常和正常心肌灌注患者的早期心肌损伤
J Nucl Cardiol. 2023 Oct;30(5):1797-1809. doi: 10.1007/s12350-023-03215-5. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
2
The addition of coronary artery calcium to myocardial perfusion: Double or nothing?冠状动脉钙化与心肌灌注联合应用:事半功倍还是徒劳无功?
J Nucl Cardiol. 2023 Jun;30(3):1019-1021. doi: 10.1007/s12350-022-03159-2. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Risk stratification among diabetic patients undergoing stress myocardial perfusion imaging.糖尿病患者行应激心肌灌注显像的危险分层。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2013 Aug;20(4):529-38. doi: 10.1007/s12350-013-9731-1. Epub 2013 May 24.
2
Prognosis in patients with suspected or known ischemic heart disease and normal myocardial perfusion: long-term outcome and temporal risk variations.疑似或已知缺血性心脏病且心肌灌注正常患者的预后:长期结果和时间风险变化。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2013 Jun;20(3):347-57. doi: 10.1007/s12350-013-9696-0. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
3
Incremental prognostic value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in asymptomatic diabetic patients.
Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in asymptomatic patients with diabetes mellitus at high cardiovascular risk: 5-year follow-up of the prospective multicenter BARDOT trial.
无症状伴高心血管风险糖尿病患者心肌灌注闪烁显像的预后价值:前瞻性多中心 BARDOT 试验的 5 年随访。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 Oct;48(11):3512-3521. doi: 10.1007/s00259-021-05349-5. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
4
Relation between myocardial blood flow and cardiac events in diabetic patients with suspected coronary artery disease and normal myocardial perfusion imaging.在疑似冠心病和正常心肌灌注成像的糖尿病患者中,心肌血流与心脏事件之间的关系。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2021 Aug;28(4):1222-1233. doi: 10.1007/s12350-021-02533-w. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
5
My warranty has expired: I need to be retested.我的保修期已过:我需要重新测试。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2019 Jun;26(3):998-1006. doi: 10.1007/s12350-017-1154-y. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
6
Coronary atherosclerotic burden vs. coronary vascular function in diabetic and nondiabetic patients with normal myocardial perfusion: a propensity score analysis.正常心肌灌注的糖尿病和非糖尿病患者的冠状动脉粥样硬化负荷与冠状动脉血管功能:一项倾向评分分析
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Jul;44(7):1129-1135. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3671-y. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
7
Negative predictive value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging and coronary computed tomography angiography: A meta-analysis.压力心肌灌注成像和冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影术的阴性预测值:荟萃分析。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2018 Oct;25(5):1588-1597. doi: 10.1007/s12350-017-0815-1. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
8
Uncontrolled risk factors and worsening perfusion pattern on SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in medically treated patients with stable chronic ischaemic heart disease.在接受药物治疗的稳定型慢性缺血性心脏病患者中,SPECT心肌灌注成像显示存在未控制的危险因素及灌注模式恶化。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Jul;43(8):1513-21. doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3355-z. Epub 2016 Mar 12.
9
Immortality time and serial myocardial perfusion imaging: Only those who do not die may repeat the exam.永生时间与系列心肌灌注成像:只有那些不会死亡的人才能重复该项检查。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2016 Feb;23(1):113-6. doi: 10.1007/s12350-015-0171-y. Epub 2015 May 14.
10
Review of cardiovascular imaging in The Journal of Nuclear Cardiology in 2014: Part 2 of 2: Myocardial perfusion imaging.《核心脏病学杂志》2014年心血管成像综述:第2部分:心肌灌注成像
J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 Aug;22(4):714-9. doi: 10.1007/s12350-015-0144-1. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
无症状糖尿病患者应激心肌灌注成像的渐进预后价值。
Atherosclerosis. 2013 Apr;227(2):307-12. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.01.011. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
4
Prognosis in the era of comparative effectiveness research: where is nuclear cardiology now and where should it be?比较效果研究时代的预后:核医学心脏病学现状及发展方向?
J Nucl Cardiol. 2012 Oct;19(5):1026-43. doi: 10.1007/s12350-012-9593-y.
5
15-Year outcome after normal exercise ⁹⁹mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging: what is the duration of low risk after a normal scan?正常运动¹⁹⁹mTc-甲氧基异丁基异腈心肌灌注显像 15 年后的结果:正常扫描后低危的持续时间是多久?
J Nucl Cardiol. 2012 Oct;19(5):901-6. doi: 10.1007/s12350-012-9587-9. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
6
Myocardial perfusion imaging and risk classification for coronary heart disease in diabetic patients. The IDIS study: a prospective, multicentre trial.心肌灌注成像与糖尿病患者冠心病危险分层。IDIS 研究:一项前瞻性、多中心试验。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012 Mar;39(3):387-95. doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-1983-x. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
7
An overview of the objectives of and the approaches to propensity score analyses.倾向评分分析的目标和方法概述。
Eur Heart J. 2011 Jul;32(14):1704-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr031. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
8
The timing and impact of follow-up studies after normal stress single-photon emission computed tomography sestamibi studies.正常应激单光子发射计算机断层扫描锝 99m sestamibi 研究后随访研究的时间和影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Sep;3(5):520-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.918706. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
9
Women and ischemic heart disease: evolving knowledge.女性与缺血性心脏病:不断发展的认知
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Oct 20;54(17):1561-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.098.
10
Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples.平衡诊断用于比较倾向评分匹配样本中治疗组间基线协变量的分布。
Stat Med. 2009 Nov 10;28(25):3083-107. doi: 10.1002/sim.3697.