Furmanik Jacek
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Tczew Hospitals JSC in Tczew, Poland.
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2013 Jul-Sep;45(3):149-52. doi: 10.5603/AIT.2013.0031.
Labour analgesia in most developed countries is funded by the state, available to every woman in labour, and plays an important role in the everyday activities of most anaesthetists. This paper presents the second part of an Obstetric Anaesthesia Survey which was conducted in 2009. The first part of the Survey, relating to anaesthesia for caesarean sections, was published in 2010.
The author sent out 432 questionnaires containing questions about hospital size and location, staffing levels and numbers of deliveries per year. There were also questions regarding regional and other pain relief methods used in labour, ways of administration, drugs used and monitoring of patients.
The response rate was 24%. Around 45% of responding hospitals had only 1-3 deliveries per year, which makes it difficult to provide separate obstetric anaesthetic cover. Only ten hospitals (11%) employed an anaesthetist for the labour ward. Epidural analgesia was used in 55% of hospitals but only 20% provided the service for 24 hours per day and free of charge. Entonox was used very occasionally, but the most common means of pain relief was pethidine injection. There were marked differences in the medication used for labour epidurals, with 18% of units using high concentrations of local anaesthetics which could result in motor block. Despite a lack of regulations in Polish law and a lack of proper training in 50% of units, midwives were looking after the patients with established labour epidural which could create medico-legal consequences. There was also a marked variation in the parameters monitored during labour analgesia.
Epidural labour analgesia was offered for 24 hours per day and free of charge in only 20% of hospitals. Without public pressure it will be difficult to get more funding from the National Health Fund (NFZ) to enable other hospitals, especially those with small obstetric units, to introduce regional labour analgesia. Although the 2009 guidelines addressed most of the issues regarding the conduct of epidural labour analgesia, changes need to be made in Polish law to allow midwives to be appropriately trained to look after parturients with regional labour analgesia.
在大多数发达国家,分娩镇痛由国家资助,每位产妇均可享受,并且在大多数麻醉医生的日常工作中发挥着重要作用。本文介绍了2009年进行的产科麻醉调查的第二部分。该调查的第一部分涉及剖宫产麻醉,已于2010年发表。
作者发出了432份问卷,内容包括医院规模和位置、人员配备水平以及每年的分娩数量。还涉及分娩时使用的区域和其他镇痛方法、给药方式、使用的药物以及患者监测等问题。
回复率为24%。约45%的回复医院每年仅有1 - 3例分娩,这使得难以提供单独的产科麻醉服务。仅有十家医院(11%)为产房配备了麻醉医生。55%的医院使用硬膜外镇痛,但只有20%的医院每天24小时免费提供该服务。恩托诺克斯很少使用,但最常见的镇痛方式是注射哌替啶。用于分娩硬膜外麻醉的药物存在显著差异,18%的单位使用高浓度局部麻醉药,这可能导致运动阻滞。尽管波兰法律缺乏相关规定,且50%的单位缺乏适当培训,但助产士却在照顾已实施分娩硬膜外麻醉的患者,这可能会产生医疗法律后果。分娩镇痛期间监测的参数也存在显著差异。
仅20%的医院每天24小时免费提供硬膜外分娩镇痛。如果没有公众压力,很难从国家卫生基金(NFZ)获得更多资金,以使其他医院,尤其是产科规模较小的医院,能够引入区域分娩镇痛。尽管2009年的指南涉及了硬膜外分娩镇痛实施的大多数问题,但波兰法律仍需做出改变,以使助产士能够接受适当培训,照顾接受区域分娩镇痛的产妇。