• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长效支气管扩张剂治疗 COPD 的疗效比较:一项网状荟萃分析。

Comparative efficacy of long-acting bronchodilators for COPD: a network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Clinical Science, St George's University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK.

出版信息

Respir Res. 2013 Oct 7;14(1):100. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-14-100.

DOI:10.1186/1465-9921-14-100
PMID:24093477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4014806/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinicians are faced with an increasingly difficult choice regarding the optimal bronchodilator for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) given the number of new treatments. The objective of this study is to evaluate the comparative efficacy of indacaterol 75/150/300 μg once daily (OD), glycopyrronium bromide 50 μg OD, tiotropium bromide 18 μg/5 μg OD, salmeterol 50 μg twice daily (BID), formoterol 12 μg BID, and placebo for moderate to severe COPD.

METHODS

Forty randomized controlled trials were combined in a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Outcomes of interest were trough and post-dose forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score and responders (≥4 points), and Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) score and responders (≥1 point) at 6 months.

RESULTS

Indacaterol was associated with a higher trough FEV1 than other active treatments (difference for indacaterol 150 μg and 300 μg versus placebo: 152 mL (95% credible interval (CrI): 126, 179); 160 mL (95% CrI: 133, 187)) and the greatest improvement in SGRQ score (difference for indacaterol 150 μg and 300 μg versus placebo: -3.9 (95% CrI -5.2, -2.6); -3.6 (95% CrI -4.8, -2.3)). Glycopyrronium and tiotropium 18 μg resulted in the next best estimates for both outcomes with minor differences (difference for glycopyrronium versus tiotropium for trough FEV1 and SGRQ: 18 mL (95% CrI: -16, 51); -0.55 (95% CrI: -2.04, 0.92).

CONCLUSION

In terms of trough FEV1 and SGRQ score indacaterol, glycopyrronium, and tiotropium are expected to be the most effective bronchodilators.

摘要

背景

由于新的治疗方法数量众多,临床医生在为慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者选择最佳支气管扩张剂时面临着越来越困难的选择。本研究的目的是评估每天一次(OD)的茚达特罗 75/150/300μg、格隆溴铵 50μg、噻托溴铵 18μg/5μg、沙美特罗 50μg 每日两次(BID)、福莫特罗 12μg BID 和安慰剂在中重度 COPD 中的比较疗效。

方法

40 项随机对照试验合并在贝叶斯网络荟萃分析中。感兴趣的结局是谷值和给药后 1 秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)评分和应答者(≥4 分)、以及过渡呼吸困难指数(TDI)评分和应答者(≥1 分)在 6 个月时。

结果

与其他活性治疗相比,茚达特罗与更高的谷值 FEV1 相关(与安慰剂相比,茚达特罗 150μg 和 300μg 的差异:152mL(95%可信区间(CrI):126,179);160mL(95%CrI:133,187)),并且 SGRQ 评分的改善最大(与安慰剂相比,茚达特罗 150μg 和 300μg 的差异:-3.9(95%CrI:-5.2,-2.6);-3.6(95%CrI:-4.8,-2.3))。与噻托溴铵相比,格隆溴铵 18μg 对这两个结局的估计结果次之,差异较小(与安慰剂相比,格隆溴铵和噻托溴铵在谷值 FEV1 和 SGRQ 方面的差异:18mL(95%CrI:-16,51);-0.55(95%CrI:-2.04,0.92))。

结论

就谷值 FEV1 和 SGRQ 评分而言,茚达特罗、格隆溴铵和噻托溴铵预计是最有效的支气管扩张剂。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8a0/4014806/fa5f1a199cbc/1465-9921-14-100-7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8a0/4014806/be3a679ffa02/1465-9921-14-100-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8a0/4014806/d97e25dc1e43/1465-9921-14-100-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8a0/4014806/7426d4e5f95e/1465-9921-14-100-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8a0/4014806/482ddebda6e4/1465-9921-14-100-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8a0/4014806/c2c13b1206b1/1465-9921-14-100-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8a0/4014806/e7b5de190372/1465-9921-14-100-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8a0/4014806/fa5f1a199cbc/1465-9921-14-100-7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8a0/4014806/be3a679ffa02/1465-9921-14-100-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8a0/4014806/d97e25dc1e43/1465-9921-14-100-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8a0/4014806/7426d4e5f95e/1465-9921-14-100-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8a0/4014806/482ddebda6e4/1465-9921-14-100-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8a0/4014806/c2c13b1206b1/1465-9921-14-100-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8a0/4014806/e7b5de190372/1465-9921-14-100-6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8a0/4014806/fa5f1a199cbc/1465-9921-14-100-7.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy of long-acting bronchodilators for COPD: a network meta-analysis.长效支气管扩张剂治疗 COPD 的疗效比较:一项网状荟萃分析。
Respir Res. 2013 Oct 7;14(1):100. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-14-100.
2
Efficacy of once-daily indacaterol 75 μg relative to alternative bronchodilators in COPD: a study level and a patient level network meta-analysis.每日一次茚达特罗 75μg 相对于 COPD 中其他支气管扩张剂的疗效:研究水平和患者水平网络荟萃分析。
BMC Pulm Med. 2012 Jun 25;12:29. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-12-29.
3
Comparative efficacy of aclidinium versus glycopyrronium and tiotropium, as maintenance treatment of moderate to severe COPD patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较阿地溴铵、格隆溴铵和噻托溴铵治疗中重度 COPD 患者的维持治疗效果:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2013;8:405-23. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S48967. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
4
Long-acting inhaled therapy (beta-agonists, anticholinergics and steroids) for COPD: a network meta-analysis.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的长效吸入疗法(β受体激动剂、抗胆碱能药物和类固醇):一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 26;2014(3):CD010844. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010844.pub2.
5
Tiotropium versus long-acting beta-agonists for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.噻托溴铵与长效β受体激动剂治疗稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD009157. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009157.pub2.
6
Long-acting beta(2)-agonist in addition to tiotropium versus either tiotropium or long-acting beta(2)-agonist alone for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.长效β₂受体激动剂联合噻托溴铵与单独使用噻托溴铵或长效β₂受体激动剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;4(4):CD008989. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008989.pub2.
7
Efficacy and Safety of Aclidinium/Formoterol versus Tiotropium in COPD: Results of an Indirect Treatment Comparison.阿地溴铵/福莫特罗与噻托溴铵治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疗效和安全性:间接治疗比较结果
Adv Ther. 2016 Mar;33(3):379-99. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0299-4. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
8
Comparative efficacy of combination bronchodilator therapies in COPD: a network meta-analysis.慢性阻塞性肺疾病中联合支气管扩张剂疗法的比较疗效:一项网状荟萃分析。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Sep 9;10:1863-81. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S87082. eCollection 2015.
9
Comparative Efficacy of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Other Bronchodilators for the Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis.乌美溴铵/维兰特罗与其他支气管扩张剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疗效比较:一项网络荟萃分析。
Adv Ther. 2022 Nov;39(11):4961-5010. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02234-x. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
10
Efficacy of indacaterol 75 μg versus fixed-dose combinations of formoterol-budesonide or salmeterol-fluticasone for COPD: a network meta-analysis.茚达特罗 75μg 与福莫特罗-布地奈德或沙美特罗-氟替卡松固定剂量复方制剂治疗 COPD 的疗效:网状meta 分析。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2012;7:415-20. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S31526. Epub 2012 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Multidimensional outcome assessment of pulmonary rehabilitation in traits-based clusters of COPD patients.基于 COPD 患者特征聚类的多维肺康复结局评估。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 17;17(2):e0263657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263657. eCollection 2022.
2
The effect of long-acting dual bronchodilator therapy on exercise tolerance, dynamic hyperinflation, and dead space during constant work rate exercise in COPD.长效双支气管扩张剂治疗对 COPD 患者恒功率运动时运动耐量、动态过度充气和死腔的影响。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2021 Jun 1;130(6):2009-2018. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00774.2020. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
3
A Network Meta-Analysis of Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist (LAMA) and Long-Acting β-Agonist (LABA) Combinations in COPD.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence synthesis for decision making 2: a generalized linear modeling framework for pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.证据综合决策 2:用于随机对照试验的成对和网络荟萃分析的广义线性建模框架。
Med Decis Making. 2013 Jul;33(5):607-17. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12458724. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
2
Efficacy and safety of NVA237 versus placebo and tiotropium in patients with COPD: the GLOW2 study.NVA237 与安慰剂和噻托溴铵治疗 COPD 患者的疗效和安全性:GLOW2 研究。
Eur Respir J. 2012 Nov;40(5):1106-14. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00040712. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
3
Tiotropium versus long-acting beta-agonists for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)中长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)与长效β受体激动剂(LABA)联合使用的网络荟萃分析
Pulm Ther. 2017 Dec;3(2):297-316. doi: 10.1007/s41030-017-0048-0. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
4
Comparative effectiveness of six Chinese herb formulas for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.六种中药方剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重的疗效比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12906-019-2633-2.
5
Decline of COPD exacerbations in clinical trials over two decades - a systematic review and meta-regression.二十多年来临床试验中 COPD 加重的减少——系统评价和荟萃回归分析。
Respir Res. 2019 Aug 16;20(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1163-2.
6
Comparative efficacy of inhaled medications (ICS/LABA, LAMA, LAMA/LABA and SAMA) for COPD: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.吸入药物(ICS/LABA、LAMA、LAMA/LABA和SAMA)治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的比较疗效:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Oct 9;13:3203-3231. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S173472. eCollection 2018.
7
Dual bronchodilation vs triple therapy in the "real-life" COPD DACCORD study.“真实世界”慢性阻塞性肺疾病DACCORD研究中双重支气管扩张疗法与三联疗法的对比
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Aug 24;13:2557-2568. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S169958. eCollection 2018.
8
Antimicrobials for the treatment of drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia in critically ill patients: a systemic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.治疗重症患者耐多药鲍曼不动杆菌肺炎的抗菌药物:系统评价和贝叶斯网状meta 分析。
Crit Care. 2017 Dec 20;21(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1916-6.
9
Recent advances in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病管理的最新进展
F1000Res. 2017 Jun 9;6:863. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.9819.1. eCollection 2017.
10
Inhaled indacaterol for the treatment of COPD patients with destroyed lung by tuberculosis and moderate-to-severe airflow limitation: results from the randomized INFINITY study.吸入茚达特罗治疗肺结核致肺毁损且有中度至重度气流受限的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者:随机INFINITY研究结果
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 May 29;12:1589-1596. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S128750. eCollection 2017.
噻托溴铵与长效β受体激动剂治疗稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD009157. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009157.pub2.
4
Efficacy of indacaterol 75 μg versus fixed-dose combinations of formoterol-budesonide or salmeterol-fluticasone for COPD: a network meta-analysis.茚达特罗 75μg 与福莫特罗-布地奈德或沙美特罗-氟替卡松固定剂量复方制剂治疗 COPD 的疗效:网状meta 分析。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2012;7:415-20. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S31526. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
5
Tiotropium versus placebo for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.噻托溴铵与安慰剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11(7):CD009285. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009285.pub2.
6
Efficacy of once-daily indacaterol 75 μg relative to alternative bronchodilators in COPD: a study level and a patient level network meta-analysis.每日一次茚达特罗 75μg 相对于 COPD 中其他支气管扩张剂的疗效:研究水平和患者水平网络荟萃分析。
BMC Pulm Med. 2012 Jun 25;12:29. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-12-29.
7
Clinical trial design in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: current perspectives and considerations with regard to blinding of tiotropium.慢性阻塞性肺疾病临床试验设计:噻托溴铵设盲的现状及考虑因素
Respir Res. 2012 Jun 22;13(1):52. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-13-52.
8
Efficacy of once-daily indacaterol relative to alternative bronchodilators in COPD: a patient-level mixed treatment comparison.每日一次茚达特罗对比其他支气管扩张剂治疗 COPD 的疗效:一项基于患者水平的混合治疗比较。
Value Health. 2012 May;15(3):524-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.01.009. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
9
Efficacy and safety of twice-daily aclidinium bromide in COPD patients: the ATTAIN study.在 COPD 患者中每日 2 次应用溴化阿地溴铵的疗效和安全性:ATTAIN 研究。
Eur Respir J. 2012 Oct;40(4):830-6. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00225511. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
10
Comparison of indacaterol with tiotropium or twice-daily long-acting β -agonists for stable COPD: a systematic review.比较茚达特罗与噻托溴铵或每日 2 次长效β激动剂治疗稳定期 COPD 的疗效:系统评价。
Chest. 2012 Nov;142(5):1104-1110. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2252.