Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, UNESP, Univ Estadual Paulista, 1193 José Bonifácio Street, Araçatuba, São Paulo 16015050, Brazil.
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2013 Dec 1;33(8):4700-14. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2013.07.027. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the stress distribution on bone tissue with a single prosthesis supported by implants of large and conventional diameter and presenting different veneering materials using the 3-D finite element method. Sixteen models were fabricated to reproduce a bone block with implants, using two diameters (3.75×10 mm and 5.00×10 mm), four different veneering materials (composite resin, acrylic resin, porcelain, and NiCr crown), and two loads (axial (200 N) and oblique (100 N)). For data analysis, the maximum principal stress and von Mises criterion were used. For the axial load, the cortical bone in all models did not exhibit significant differences, and the trabecular bone presented higher tensile stress with reduced implant diameter. For the oblique load, the cortical bone presented a significant increase in tensile stress on the same side as the loading for smaller implant diameters. The trabecular bone showed a similar but more discreet trend. There was no difference in bone tissue with different veneering materials. The veneering material did not influence the stress distribution in the supporting tissues of single implant-supported prostheses. The large-diameter implants improved the transference of occlusal loads to bone tissue and decreased stress mainly under oblique loads. Oblique loading was more detrimental to distribution stresses than axial loading.
本研究旨在通过三维有限元法评估由大直径和常规直径的种植体支持的单假体的骨组织的应力分布,并具有不同的饰面材料。制作了 16 个模型,以使用两种直径(3.75×10mm 和 5.00×10mm)、四种不同的饰面材料(复合树脂、丙烯酸树脂、瓷和 NiCr 冠)和两种负载(轴向(200N)和倾斜(100N)来复制带有种植体的骨块。为了数据分析,使用了最大主应力和 von Mises 准则。对于轴向载荷,所有模型中的皮质骨均无明显差异,而小梁骨的植入物直径减小会导致更高的拉伸应力。对于斜向载荷,皮质骨在加载侧的拉伸应力显著增加,对于较小的植入物直径。小梁骨显示出类似但更不明显的趋势。不同饰面材料的骨组织没有差异。饰面材料不会影响单种植体支持义齿的支持组织中的应力分布。大直径种植体改善了咬合负荷向骨组织的传递,并主要在斜向负荷下减少了应力。斜向载荷比轴向载荷更不利于分布应力。