School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada(1); Pathokinesiology Laboratory, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Institut de réadaptation Gingras-Lindsay-de-Montréal, Montreal, Canada(2).
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013 Dec;23(6):1325-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.09.003. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of imposing different degrees of forward trunk flexion during sitting pivot transfers on electromyographic activity at the leading and trailing upper limb muscles and on dynamic stability requirements. Thirty-two individuals with a spinal cord injury performed three types of sitting pivot transfers: natural technique, exaggerated forward trunk flexion and upright trunk position. Ground reaction forces, trunk kinematics, and bilateral electromyographic activity of eight upper limb muscles were recorded. Electromyographic data were analyzed using the area under the curve of the muscular utilization ratio. Dynamic stability requirements of sitting pivot transfers were assess using a dynamic equilibrium model. Compared to the natural strategy, significantly greater muscle activities were found for the forward trunk flexion condition at the anterior deltoid and both heads of the pectorialis major, whereas the upright trunk strategy yielded greater muscle activity at the latissimus dorsii and the triceps. The forward flexed condition was found to be more dynamically stable, with a lower stabilizing force, increased area of base of support and greater distance traveled. Thus, transferring with a more forward trunk inclination, even though it increases work of few muscles, may be a beneficial trade-off because increased dynamic stability of this technique and versatility in terms of potential distance of the transfer.
本研究旨在探讨在坐姿枢轴转移过程中施加不同程度的前躯干屈曲对上肢主导和跟随肌肉的肌电活动以及动态稳定性要求的影响。32 名脊髓损伤患者进行了三种坐姿枢轴转移:自然技术、过度前躯干屈曲和直立躯干位置。记录地面反作用力、躯干运动学和 8 个上肢肌肉的双侧肌电图活动。使用肌肉利用率曲线下的面积分析肌电图数据。使用动态平衡模型评估坐姿枢轴转移的动态稳定性要求。与自然策略相比,在前三角肌和胸大肌的两个头中,前躯干屈曲状态下的肌肉活动明显更大,而直立躯干策略下的背阔肌和三头肌的肌肉活动更大。前屈状态被认为更具动态稳定性,所需的稳定力更小,支撑基础面积增加,移动距离更大。因此,即使增加了少数肌肉的工作,采用更前倾的躯干倾斜度进行转移可能是一种有益的权衡,因为这种技术的动态稳定性提高了,并且转移的潜在距离也更灵活。