• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从政治争议到技术问题?芬兰十五年的阿片类药物替代治疗。

From political controversy to a technical problem? Fifteen years of opioid substitution treatment in Finland.

机构信息

Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 Jyväskylä, Finland.

National Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, FI-00271 Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Int J Drug Policy. 2013 Nov;24(6):e66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.08.007. Epub 2013 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.08.007
PMID:24095679
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of the article is to analyze changes in opioid substitution treatments (OST) in Finland. OST spread in Finland in the late 1990s and early 2000s (Phase 1). Since then, OST has become an integrated part of Finnish drug policy and is provided in various substance abuse treatment units as well as in municipal health centers (Phase 2).

METHODS

The paper analyses the policy around the implementation of opioid substitution treatment in Finland, focusing on identifying the key factors and the relations between them that have contributed to the implementation of OST in Finland.

RESULTS

OST has become accepted in Finland during the past ten years as a crucial element of a harm reduction strategy. Present incentives behind this development are not as clearly related to drug-specific policies as in the late 1990s; rather, they stem from both the restructuring of health care services (e.g. cost-effectiveness) and the strengthening of the medical or technico-administrative approach to the development of OST.

CONCLUSION

Since the early 2000s, the development of substitution treatment in Finland has not taken place under explicit drug-political guidance, but largely as a result of many differing intended and unintended effects. One of the unintended effects is the fact that buprenorphine has replaced heroin as the most commonly misused opioid in Finland.

摘要

背景

本文旨在分析芬兰阿片类物质替代疗法(OST)的变化。OST 在 20 世纪 90 年代末和 21 世纪初在芬兰传播(第 1 阶段)。从那时起,OST 已成为芬兰毒品政策的一个组成部分,在各种药物滥用治疗单位以及市立保健中心提供(第 2 阶段)。

方法

本文分析了在芬兰实施阿片类物质替代治疗的政策,重点是确定促成芬兰 OST 实施的关键因素及其相互关系。

结果

在过去的十年中,OST 在芬兰已被接受,成为减少伤害策略的关键要素。目前推动这一发展的动力与其说是与特定药物的政策明显相关,不如说是来自医疗保健服务的重构(例如成本效益),以及对 OST 发展的医疗或技术行政方法的加强。

结论

自 21 世纪初以来,芬兰替代疗法的发展并没有在明确的毒品政策指导下进行,而是在很大程度上是由于许多不同的预期和非预期的效果。非预期的效果之一是丁丙诺啡已取代海洛因,成为芬兰最常被滥用的阿片类药物。

相似文献

1
From political controversy to a technical problem? Fifteen years of opioid substitution treatment in Finland.从政治争议到技术问题?芬兰十五年的阿片类药物替代治疗。
Int J Drug Policy. 2013 Nov;24(6):e66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.08.007. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
2
Methadone, a contested substance: Danish methadone policy in the 1970s.美沙酮,一种有争议的物质:20 世纪 70 年代的丹麦美沙酮政策。
Int J Drug Policy. 2013 Nov;24(6):e73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.08.008. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
3
Zoned Out: "NIMBYism", addiction services and municipal governance in British Columbia.分区失效:不列颠哥伦比亚省的“邻避主义”、成瘾服务和市政治理。
Int J Drug Policy. 2013 Nov;24(6):e61-5. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.04.001. Epub 2013 May 13.
4
Work and the journey to recovery: exploring the implications of welfare reform for methadone maintenance clients.工作与康复之旅:探索福利改革对美沙酮维持治疗患者的影响。
Int J Drug Policy. 2013 Nov;24(6):e81-6. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.08.006. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
5
The politics of providing opioid pharmacotherapy.提供阿片类药物药物治疗的政治学
Int J Drug Policy. 2013 Nov;24(6):e6-10. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.09.009. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
6
Examining structural violence in opioid pharmacotherapy treatment in Australia: sweating the "small stuff" in a liberal paradise.审视澳大利亚阿片类药物药物治疗中的结构性暴力:在自由天堂中纠结于“细枝末节”
Int J Drug Policy. 2013 Nov;24(6):e11-3. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.04.010. Epub 2013 May 25.
7
The trajectory of methadone maintenance treatment in Nepal.尼泊尔美沙酮维持治疗的轨迹。
Int J Drug Policy. 2013 Nov;24(6):e57-60. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
8
The marketing of methadone: how an effective medication became unpopular.美沙酮的市场营销:一种有效药物缘何不受欢迎。
Int J Drug Policy. 2013 Nov;24(6):e89-90. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.10.006. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
9
Substance, structure and stigma: parents in the UK accounting for opioid substitution therapy during the antenatal and postnatal periods.物质、结构和污名:英国父母在产前和产后期间对阿片类药物替代疗法的认知。
Int J Drug Policy. 2013 Nov;24(6):e35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 May 18.
10
Partnerships and communities in English drug policy: the challenge of deprivation.英国毒品政策中的伙伴关系和社区:贫困的挑战。
Int J Drug Policy. 2011 Nov;22(6):478-90. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2011.06.003. Epub 2011 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Are there national strategies, plans and guidelines for the treatment of hepatitis C in people who inject drugs? A survey of 33 European countries.是否存在针对注射吸毒者丙型肝炎治疗的国家战略、计划和指南?对33个欧洲国家的调查。
BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-S6-S14. Epub 2014 Sep 19.