• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

专职气管切开护理护士方案对结果的影响。

Implications of dedicated tracheostomy care nurse program on outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Critical Care, SPS Apollo Hospitals, Ludhiana, India,

出版信息

J Anesth. 2014 Jun;28(3):374-80. doi: 10.1007/s00540-013-1718-1. Epub 2013 Oct 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00540-013-1718-1
PMID:24097169
Abstract

PURPOSE

Tracheostomy is a common occurrence in intensive care units (ICU), and a greater number of tracheostomized patients are shifted from ICU to non-critical areas. Tracheostomy care needs a multidisciplinary approach, particularly involving the nurses, and complications such as tube blockage, infection, and bleeding can be prevented by good bedside nursing. The aim was to study the impact of dedicated tracheostomy care nurse program on outcomes of tracheostomized patients.

METHODS

A tracheostomy care nurse program was improvised by the critical care physicians, with the objective of improving care of tracheostomized patients, wherein nursing staff from noncritical areas were selected for training purposes. The training included evidence-based knowledge and hands-on training. After a written assessment and a skill test, they were certified as 'Tracheostomy Care Nurse.' At least one of the tracheostomy care nurses was supposed to be responsible for tracheostomy care in specific wards. Comparative data of two periods, a pre-intervention period from January 2011 to November 2011 and a post-intervention period from December 2011 to October 2012, were analyzed.

RESULTS

During the pre-intervention period, of 82 tracheostomized patients, 28 (34.15 %) had complications including 20 (24.39 %) readmissions to the ICU. During the post-intervention period, 107 patients had a tracheostomy, of which 7 (6.54 %) had complications with only 2 (1.87 %) readmissions, which was significant (p < 0.05). Decannulations nonsignificantly increased during the post-intervention period (25 vs. 16 %, p > 0.05). The average length of hospital stay (ALOS) decreased from 36 to 27 days (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The support of a specialist tracheostomy nurse can decrease complication rates and readmissions to the ICU and reduce ALOS.

摘要

目的

气管切开术在重症监护病房(ICU)中很常见,越来越多的气管切开患者从 ICU 转移到非重症区域。气管切开护理需要多学科方法,特别是涉及护士,通过良好的床边护理可以预防管腔堵塞、感染和出血等并发症。目的是研究专门的气管切开护理护士计划对气管切开患者结局的影响。

方法

由重症监护医生制定了气管切开护理护士计划,目的是改善气管切开患者的护理,为此从非重症区域选拔护理人员进行培训。培训包括循证知识和实践培训。经过书面评估和技能测试后,他们被认证为“气管切开护理护士”。至少有一名气管切开护理护士负责特定病房的气管切开护理。分析了两个时期的对比数据,干预前时期为 2011 年 1 月至 2011 年 11 月,干预后时期为 2011 年 12 月至 2012 年 10 月。

结果

在干预前时期,82 例气管切开患者中有 28 例(34.15%)发生并发症,其中 20 例(24.39%)重新入住 ICU。在干预后时期,有 107 例患者进行了气管切开术,其中 7 例(6.54%)发生并发症,仅 2 例(1.87%)重新入住 ICU,差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。干预后时期的拔管率显著增加(25%比 16%,p>0.05)。平均住院时间(ALOS)从 36 天减少到 27 天(p<0.05)。

结论

专科气管切开护理护士的支持可以降低并发症发生率和 ICU 重新入院率,并缩短平均住院时间。

相似文献

1
Implications of dedicated tracheostomy care nurse program on outcomes.专职气管切开护理护士方案对结果的影响。
J Anesth. 2014 Jun;28(3):374-80. doi: 10.1007/s00540-013-1718-1. Epub 2013 Oct 6.
2
Improving Tracheostomy Care Delivery: Instituting Clinical Care Pathways and Nursing Education to Improve Patient Outcomes.改善气管造口护理服务:建立临床护理路径和开展护理教育以改善患者预后。
ORL Head Neck Nurs. 2016 Winter;34(1):7-16.
3
Safety, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of a multidisciplinary percutaneous tracheostomy program.多学科经皮气管切开术项目的安全性、效率和成本效益。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Jun;40(6):1827-34. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31824e16af.
4
Impact of a specialized multidisciplinary tracheostomy team on tracheostomy care in critically ill patients.专门的多学科气管切开术团队对危重症患者气管切开护理的影响。
Can J Surg. 2011 Jun;54(3):167-72. doi: 10.1503/cjs.043209.
5
Early Percutaneous Tracheostomy in Coronavirus Disease 2019: Association With Hospital Mortality and Factors Associated With Removal of Tracheostomy Tube at ICU Discharge. A Cohort Study on 121 Patients.2019 年冠状病毒病患者的早期经皮气管切开术:与医院死亡率的关联以及与 ICU 出院时气管切开管移除相关的因素。对 121 例患者的队列研究。
Crit Care Med. 2021 Feb 1;49(2):261-270. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004752.
6
[Analysis of early tracheostomy and its impact on development of pneumonia, use of resources and mortality in neurocritically ill patients].[早期气管切开术及其对神经危重症患者肺炎发生、资源利用和死亡率影响的分析]
Neurocirugia (Astur). 2010 Jun;21(3):211-21.
7
The Trach Trail: A Systems-Based Pathway to Improve Quality of Tracheostomy Care and Interdisciplinary Collaboration.经皮气管切开术路径:改善气管切开护理质量和促进多学科协作的系统方法。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Aug;163(2):232-243. doi: 10.1177/0194599820917427. Epub 2020 May 26.
8
Comparison of Patients Undergoing Tracheostomy in the Intensive Care Unit versus in the Wards.重症监护病房与普通病房中行气管切开术患者的比较。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2020 Oct;22(10):633-638.
9
Safety and complications of percutaneous tracheostomy in a cohort of 800 mixed ICU patients.800例综合重症监护病房患者经皮气管切开术的安全性及并发症
Anaesthesia. 2008 Nov;63(11):1198-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05606.x. Epub 2008 Aug 19.
10
Tracheostomy care and management in general wards and community settings: literature review.普通病房和社区环境中的气管切开护理和管理:文献回顾。
Nurs Crit Care. 2010 Mar-Apr;15(2):76-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2010.00386.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of a Need-based Interventional Tracheostomy Care Protocol on Knowledge and Practice of Tracheostomy Care among Nurses.基于需求的介入性气管造口护理方案对护士气管造口护理知识与实践的效果
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Nov;28(11):1050-1055. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24826. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
2
Otolaryngologists' Initiative for Collaborative Tracheostomy Care: Knowledge, Attitude and Skill in Tracheostomy Care Among Nurses - An Interventional Study from India.耳鼻喉科医生协作气管造口护理倡议:护士气管造口护理的知识、态度和技能——一项来自印度的干预性研究
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 May 6;75(3):1-7. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-03682-9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Tracheostomy teams reduce total tracheostomy time and increase speaking valve use: a systematic review and meta-analysis.气管造口术团队可缩短总气管造口术时间并增加说话阀的使用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Crit Care. 2013 Apr;28(2):216.e1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.05.005. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
2
Multidisciplinary team approach in the management of tracheostomy patients.多学科团队方法在气管切开术患者管理中的应用。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Oct;147(4):684-91. doi: 10.1177/0194599812449995. Epub 2012 Jun 5.
3
Impact of a specialized multidisciplinary tracheostomy team on tracheostomy care in critically ill patients.
Pediatric Tracheostomy Emergency Readiness Assessment Tool: International Consensus Recommendations.
儿科气管切开术应急准备评估工具:国际共识建议。
Laryngoscope. 2023 Dec;133(12):3588-3601. doi: 10.1002/lary.30674. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
4
Attitude and practices of tracheostomy care among nursing staff in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯护理人员对气管造口护理的态度和做法。
BMC Nurs. 2022 Dec 23;21(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01150-3.
5
Assessment of the ability, perception, and readiness of nurses to manage tracheostomy-related complications in Riyadh City: a cross-sectional study.利雅得市护士处理气管切开相关并发症的能力、认知及准备情况评估:一项横断面研究
BMC Nurs. 2022 Nov 23;21(1):320. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01101-y.
6
Comparison of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia and Surgical Site Infection between Two Methods of Tracheostomy.两种气管切开方法与呼吸机相关性肺炎和手术部位感染的比较。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Jul 15;2022:3186634. doi: 10.1155/2022/3186634. eCollection 2022.
7
Impact of early versus late tracheostomy on patient outcomes in a tertiary care multispeciality ICU.三级综合多专科重症监护病房中早期与晚期气管切开术对患者预后的影响。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Jul-Sep;37(3):458-463. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_229_18. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
8
Tracheostomy Care Education for the Nonsurgical First Responder: A Needs-Based Assessment and Quality Improvement Initiative.面向非手术急救人员的气管造口护理教育:基于需求的评估与质量改进计划。
OTO Open. 2019 Apr 24;3(2):2473974X19844993. doi: 10.1177/2473974X19844993. eCollection 2019 Apr-Jun.
9
Role of the multidisciplinary team in the care of the tracheostomy patient.多学科团队在气管造口术患者护理中的作用。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2017 Oct 11;10:391-398. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S118419. eCollection 2017.
专门的多学科气管切开术团队对危重症患者气管切开护理的影响。
Can J Surg. 2011 Jun;54(3):167-72. doi: 10.1503/cjs.043209.
4
Tracheostomy management in acute care facilities--a matter of teamwork.急性护理机构中的气管切开术管理——团队合作的问题。
J Clin Nurs. 2010 May;19(9-10):1275-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03155.x. Epub 2010 Mar 18.
5
Tracheostomy care and management in general wards and community settings: literature review.普通病房和社区环境中的气管切开护理和管理:文献回顾。
Nurs Crit Care. 2010 Mar-Apr;15(2):76-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2010.00386.x.
6
Multidisciplinary care for tracheostomy patients: a systematic review.气管切开术患者的多学科护理:系统评价。
Crit Care. 2009;13(6):R177. doi: 10.1186/cc8159. Epub 2009 Nov 6.
7
An intensivist-led tracheostomy review team is associated with shorter decannulation time and length of stay: a prospective cohort study.由重症医学专家主导的气管切开术评估团队与更短的拔管时间和住院时间相关:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2008;12(2):R48. doi: 10.1186/cc6864. Epub 2008 Apr 11.
8
Tracheostomy does not improve the outcome of patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation: a propensity analysis.气管切开术并不能改善需要长期机械通气患者的预后:一项倾向分析。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):132-8. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000251134.96055.A6.
9
Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.危重症患者经皮扩张气管切开术与外科气管切开术的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Crit Care. 2006;10(2):R55. doi: 10.1186/cc4887.
10
Evaluation of the role of a specialist tracheostomy service. From critical care to outreach and beyond.评估专业气管造口护理服务的作用。从重症监护到院外护理及其他。
Postgrad Med J. 2004 Aug;80(946):478-80. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2003.016956.