• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术(<48小时)治疗轻度胆石性胰腺炎患者的安全性:文献系统评价与荟萃分析]

[The safety of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (<48 hours) for patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis].

作者信息

Randial Pérez Leonardo José, Fernando Parra Juan, Aldana Dimas Guillermo

机构信息

Cirugía General, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud (FUCS)-Hospital San José, Bogotá, Colombia.

Cirugía General, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud (FUCS)-Hospital San José, Bogotá, Colombia.

出版信息

Cir Esp. 2014 Feb;92(2):107-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2013.01.024. Epub 2013 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.ciresp.2013.01.024
PMID:24099593
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In mild gallstone pancreatitis, cholecystectomy decreases the risk of recurrence. This should be performed during the initial hospitalization, but even when this is performed, the hospital stay can be prolonged, with an increase in costs and morbidity. The aim of this study is to compare the complication rate between patients who underwent an early cholecystectomy (<48 hours) vs. a late one (>48 hours).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search was performed in the following data bases: PubMed, EMBASE, LILACS and Scielo. Articles on patients with acute, mild gallstone pancreatitis who required a cholecystectomy during their initial hospitalization were included and compared with those undergoing a late cholecystectomy, in order to evaluate the complications, number of days of hospitalization and need for readmission. The quality of the studies and the risks of bias were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 580 articles and summaries were identified which included 3 observational studies and a randomized clinical trial. A total of 636 patients who underwent a cholecystectomy during the initial hospitalization were included,. Ten of 207 (4.83%) in the early cholecystectomy group showed some type of complication, and 19 of 429 (4.42%) in the late cholecystectomy group, with a risk difference of -0.0016 IC 95% ([-0.04]-0.04). Three of the included studies should be considered of low quality and one of high quality. No publication bias was evidenced.

CONCLUSION

No differences in complication rate were found between patients who underwent an early cholecystectomy versus a late cholecystectomy; nevertheless, further studies should be carried out in order to confirm these findings.

摘要

背景

在轻度胆石性胰腺炎中,胆囊切除术可降低复发风险。该手术应在初次住院期间进行,但即便如此,住院时间仍可能延长,成本和发病率也会增加。本研究旨在比较早期(<48小时)与晚期(>48小时)行胆囊切除术患者的并发症发生率。

材料与方法

在以下数据库进行系统检索:PubMed、EMBASE、LILACS和Scielo。纳入初次住院期间需要行胆囊切除术的急性轻度胆石性胰腺炎患者的文章,并与晚期行胆囊切除术的患者进行比较,以评估并发症、住院天数及再次入院需求。评估研究质量和偏倚风险。

结果

共识别出580篇文章和摘要,其中包括3项观察性研究和1项随机临床试验。总共纳入了636例初次住院期间行胆囊切除术的患者。早期胆囊切除术组207例中有10例(4.83%)出现某种类型的并发症,晚期胆囊切除术组429例中有19例(4.42%)出现并发症,风险差异为-0.0016,95%置信区间为([-0.04]-0.04)。纳入的研究中有3项应视为低质量,1项为高质量。未发现发表偏倚。

结论

早期与晚期行胆囊切除术的患者在并发症发生率上未发现差异;然而,仍需进一步研究以证实这些发现。

相似文献

1
[The safety of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (<48 hours) for patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis].[早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术(<48小时)治疗轻度胆石性胰腺炎患者的安全性:文献系统评价与荟萃分析]
Cir Esp. 2014 Feb;92(2):107-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2013.01.024. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
2
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallstone pancreatitis.急性胆石性胰腺炎早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 2;2013(9):CD010326. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010326.pub2.
3
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for people with acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎患者早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 30(6):CD005440. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005440.pub3.
4
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
5
Day-surgery versus overnight stay surgery for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术的日间手术与过夜留院手术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 31;2013(7):CD006798. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006798.pub4.
6
Timing of cholecystectomy after mild biliary pancreatitis: a systematic review.轻度胆源性胰腺炎后胆囊切除术的时机:系统评价。
Ann Surg. 2012 May;255(5):860-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182507646.
7
Intraperitoneal local anaesthetic instillation versus no intraperitoneal local anaesthetic instillation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术时腹腔内局部麻醉与不腹腔内局部麻醉的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 25;10(10):CD007337. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007337.pub4.
8
Laparoscopic-endoscopic rendezvous versus preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in people undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for stones in the gallbladder and bile duct.腹腔镜 - 内镜会师术与术前内镜括约肌切开术治疗胆囊和胆管结石行腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 11;4(4):CD010507. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010507.pub2.
9
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated biliary colic.早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗单纯性胆绞痛
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 30;2013(6):CD007196. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007196.pub3.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing cholecystectomy time in moderate acute biliary pancreatitis: A randomized clinical trial study.优化中度急性胆源性胰腺炎的胆囊切除术时机:一项随机临床试验研究。
Heliyon. 2020 Feb 17;6(2):e03388. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03388. eCollection 2020 Feb.
2
Why are we performing fewer cholecystectomies for mild acute biliary pancreatitis? Trends and predictors of cholecystectomy from the National Readmissions Database (2010-2014).为什么我们为轻度急性胆源性胰腺炎实施的胆囊切除术越来越少?来自国家再入院数据库(2010 - 2014年)的胆囊切除术趋势及预测因素
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2019 Aug 29;7(5):331-337. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goz037. eCollection 2019 Oct.
3
Methodological overview of systematic reviews to establish the evidence base for emergency general surgery.
建立急诊普通外科循证基础的系统评价方法概述
Br J Surg. 2017 Apr;104(5):513-524. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10476.
4
Prevalence and characteristics of clinically significant retained common bile duct stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis.有症状胆结石行腹腔镜胆囊切除术后具有临床意义的胆总管残留结石的患病率及特征
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016 Nov;91(5):239-246. doi: 10.4174/astr.2016.91.5.239. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
5
Clinical practice guideline: management of acute pancreatitis.临床实践指南:急性胰腺炎的管理
Can J Surg. 2016 Apr;59(2):128-40. doi: 10.1503/cjs.015015.
6
Is intraoperative cholangiography necessary during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis?在腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆结石过程中,术中胆管造影是否必要?
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 21;21(7):2147-51. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i7.2147.