Khanna Reena, MacDonald John K, Levesque Barrett G
*Robarts Clinical Trials, Robarts Research Institute, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada †Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul;48(6):505-12. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182a88357.
GOALS: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of enteric-coated peppermint oil capsules compared with placebo for the treatment of active irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). BACKGROUND: IBS is a common disorder that is often encountered in clinical practice. Medical interventions are limited and the focus is on symptom control. STUDY: Randomized placebo-controlled trials with a minimum treatment duration of 2 weeks were considered for inclusion. Cross-over studies that provided outcome data before the first cross-over were included. A literature search upto February 2013 identified all applicable randomized-controlled trials. Study quality was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Outcomes included global improvement of IBS symptoms, improvement in abdominal pain, and adverse events. Outcomes were analyzed using an intention-to-treat approach. RESULTS: Nine studies that evaluated 726 patients were identified. The risk of bias was low for most of the factors assessed. Peppermint oil was found to be significantly superior to placebo for global improvement of IBS symptoms (5 studies, 392 patients, relative risk 2.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.78-2.81) and improvement in abdominal pain (5 studies, 357 patients, relative risk 2.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.64-2.79). Although peppermint oil patients were significantly more likely to experience an adverse event, such events were mild and transient in nature. The most commonly reported adverse event was heartburn. CONCLUSIONS: Peppermint oil is a safe and effective short-term treatment for IBS. Future studies should assess the long-term efficacy and safety of peppermint oil and its efficacy relative to other IBS treatments including antidepressants and antispasmodic drugs.
目标:本研究旨在评估肠溶薄荷油胶囊与安慰剂相比治疗活动性肠易激综合征(IBS)的疗效和安全性。 背景:IBS是临床实践中常见的一种疾病。医学干预有限,重点在于症状控制。 研究:纳入至少为期2周的随机安慰剂对照试验。纳入在首次交叉前提供结局数据的交叉研究。截至2013年2月的文献检索确定了所有适用的随机对照试验。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估研究质量。结局包括IBS症状的总体改善、腹痛改善及不良事件。采用意向性分析方法分析结局。 结果:确定了9项评估726例患者的研究。评估的大多数因素的偏倚风险较低。发现薄荷油在IBS症状总体改善方面显著优于安慰剂(5项研究,392例患者,相对风险2.23;95%置信区间,1.78 - 2.81)以及在腹痛改善方面(5项研究,357例患者,相对风险2.14;95%置信区间,1.64 - 2.79)。虽然服用薄荷油的患者发生不良事件的可能性显著更高,但此类事件性质轻微且短暂。最常报告的不良事件是烧心。 结论:薄荷油是IBS安全有效的短期治疗方法。未来研究应评估薄荷油的长期疗效和安全性及其相对于包括抗抑郁药和抗痉挛药在内的其他IBS治疗方法的疗效。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014-7
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019-12-16
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011-8-10
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005-4-18
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-6-29
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008-1-23
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-8-5
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013-11-13
Biomolecules. 2024-7-21
Microorganisms. 2022-11-25
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022-11