Hernandez-Boussard Tina, McDonald Kathryn M, Rhoads Kim F, Curtin Catherine M
From the *Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine; †Center for Health Policy, Stanford University, Stanford; ‡Rehabilitation Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto; and §Division of Plastic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Ann Plast Surg. 2015 May;74(5):597-602. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318297791e.
Improving quality of health care is a global priority. Before quality benchmarks are established, we first must understand rates of adverse events (AEs). This project assessed risk-adjusted rates of inpatient AEs for soft tissue reconstructive procedures.Patients receiving soft tissue reconstructive procedures from 2005 to 2010 were extracted from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Inpatient AEs were identified using patient safety indicators (PSIs), established measures developed by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.We identified 409,991 patients with soft tissue reconstruction and 16,635 (4.06%) had a PSI during their hospital stay. Patient safety indicators were associated with increased risk-adjusted mortality, longer length of stay, and decreased routine disposition (P < 0.01). Patient characteristics associated with a higher risk-adjusted rate per 1000 patients at risk included older age, men, nonwhite, and public payer (P < 0.05). Overall, plastic surgery patients had significantly lower risk-adjusted rate compared to other surgical inpatients for all events evaluated except for failure to rescue and postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma, which were not statistically different. Risk-adjusted rates of hematoma hemorrhage were significantly higher in patients receiving size-reduction surgery, and these rates were further accentuated when broken down by sex and payer. In general, plastic surgery patients had lower rates of in-hospital AEs than other surgical disciplines, but PSIs were not uncommon. With the establishment of national basal PSI rates in plastic surgery patients, benchmarks can be devised and target areas for quality improvement efforts identified. Further prospective studies should be designed to elucidate the drivers of AEs identified in this population.
提高医疗质量是全球的首要任务。在确立质量基准之前,我们首先必须了解不良事件(AE)的发生率。本项目评估了软组织重建手术住院患者不良事件的风险调整率。从全国住院患者样本中提取了2005年至2010年接受软组织重建手术的患者。使用患者安全指标(PSI)来识别住院患者不良事件,PSI是由医疗保健研究与质量局制定的既定指标。我们识别出409,991例进行软组织重建的患者,其中16,635例(4.06%)在住院期间发生了PSI事件。患者安全指标与风险调整后死亡率增加、住院时间延长以及常规出院率降低相关(P<0.01)。每1000例有风险患者中,与较高风险调整率相关的患者特征包括年龄较大、男性、非白人以及公共支付者(P<0.05)。总体而言,除未能成功抢救以及术后出血或血肿外(这两者无统计学差异),在所有评估事件中,整形外科患者的风险调整率显著低于其他外科住院患者。接受缩容手术的患者血肿出血的风险调整率显著更高,按性别和支付者细分时这些比率进一步加剧。一般来说,整形外科患者的院内不良事件发生率低于其他外科学科,但PSI并不罕见。随着整形外科患者全国基础PSI率的确定,可以制定基准并确定质量改进工作的目标领域。应设计进一步的前瞻性研究以阐明该人群中已识别出的不良事件的驱动因素。