选定的患者安全指标的有效性:机会与关注。

Validity of selected Patient Safety Indicators: opportunities and concerns.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jun;212(6):924-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.07.007. Epub 2010 Dec 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) recently designed the Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) to detect potential safety-related adverse events. The National Quality Forum has endorsed several of these ICD-9-CM-based indicators as quality-of-care measures. We examined the positive predictive value (PPV) of 3 surgical PSIs: postoperative pulmonary embolus and deep vein thrombosis (pPE/DVT), iatrogenic pneumothorax (iPTX), and accidental puncture and laceration (APL).

STUDY DESIGN

We applied the AHRQ PSI software (v.3.1a) to fiscal year 2003 to 2007 Veterans Health Administration (VA) administrative data to identify (flag) patients suspected of having a pPE/DVT, iPTX, or APL. Two trained nurse abstractors reviewed a sample of 336 flagged medical records (112 records per PSI) using a standardized instrument. Inter-rater reliability was assessed.

RESULTS

Of 2,343,088 admissions, 6,080 were flagged for pPE/DVT (0.26%), 1,402 for iPTX (0.06%), and 7,203 for APL (0.31%). For pPE/DVT, the PPV was 43% (95% CI, 34% to 53%); 21% of cases had inaccurate coding (eg, arterial not venous thrombosis); and 36% featured thromboembolism present on admission or preoperatively. For iPTX, the PPV was 73% (95% CI, 64% to 81%); 18% had inaccurate coding (eg, spontaneous pneumothorax), and 9% were pneumothoraces present on admission. For APL, the PPV was 85% (95% CI, 77% to 91%); 10% of cases had coding inaccuracies and 5% indicated injuries present on admission. However, 27% of true APLs were minor injuries requiring no surgical repair (eg, small serosal bowel tear). Inter-rater reliability was >90% for all 3 PSIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Until coding revisions are implemented, these PSIs, especially pPE/DVT, should be used primarily for screening and case-finding. Their utility for public reporting and pay-for-performance needs to be reassessed.

摘要

背景

医疗保健研究与质量署(AHRQ)最近设计了患者安全指标(PSIs)来检测潜在的安全相关不良事件。国家质量论坛已认可了其中一些基于 ICD-9-CM 的指标作为医疗质量措施。我们检查了 3 种外科 PSIs 的阳性预测值(PPV):术后肺栓塞和深静脉血栓形成(pPE/DVT)、医源性气胸(iPTX)和意外穿刺和撕裂伤(APL)。

研究设计

我们应用 AHRQ PSI 软件(v.3.1a)对 2003 年至 2007 年退伍军人事务部(VA)行政数据进行分析,以识别(标记)疑似患有 pPE/DVT、iPTX 或 APL 的患者。两名经过培训的护士摘要员使用标准化工具对 336 份标记病历(每个 PSI 112 份)进行了抽样审查。评估了组内可靠性。

结果

在 2343088 例入院患者中,有 6080 例被标记为 pPE/DVT(0.26%),1402 例为 iPTX(0.06%),7203 例为 APL(0.31%)。对于 pPE/DVT,PPV 为 43%(95%CI,34%至 53%);21%的病例编码不准确(例如,动脉而非静脉血栓形成);36%的病例在入院或术前存在血栓栓塞。对于 iPTX,PPV 为 73%(95%CI,64%至 81%);18%的病例编码不准确(例如,自发性气胸),9%的病例在入院时存在气胸。对于 APL,PPV 为 85%(95%CI,77%至 91%);10%的病例编码不准确,5%的病例在入院时存在损伤。然而,27%的真正 APL 是不需要手术修复的小损伤(例如,小浆膜肠撕裂)。对于所有 3 个 PSIs,组内可靠性均>90%。

结论

在进行编码修订之前,这些 PSIs,特别是 pPE/DVT,应主要用于筛查和病例发现。需要重新评估其用于公共报告和按绩效付费的效用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索