Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Canada.
Cephalalgia. 2014 Apr;34(4):258-67. doi: 10.1177/0333102413508661. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
Migraine is the most common neurological condition in developed countries. The abortive treatment of migraine attacks is important both for quality of life and costs associated with illness. Triptans, serotonin 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists, effectively relieve the pain, disability, and associated symptoms of migraine while improving health-related quality of life. Although a number of direct head-to-head triptan comparisons have been made, data for all possible permutations are not available, and unlikely to ever be so, although in clinical practice such information would be useful.
We aimed to determine the relative efficacy of all available triptans to abort migraine headache among patients with previous adequate response to migraine treatments.
We included only double-blinded randomized clinical trials comparing triptans to either placebo or another triptan. Our primary outcomes were pain-free response at two hours and 24-hour sustained pain-free response, and our secondary outcomes were headache response at two hours and 24-hour sustained headache response. We used Bayesian multiple treatment comparison meta-analyses of seven triptans used in adult patients to abort migraine attacks. We applied a random-effects analysis with meta-regression adjusting for dose. Results are reported as odds ratios with 95% credible intervals.
We included data from 74 randomized clinical trials. All triptans were significantly superior to placebo for all outcomes, with the exception of naratriptan for 24-hour sustained pain-free response. Eletriptan consistently yielded the highest treatment effect estimates. For the two-hour endpoints, eletriptan was statistically significantly superior to sumatriptan, almotriptan, naratriptan, and frovatriptan for at least one of the two outcomes. Rizatriptan yielded the second highest treatment effects followed by zolmitriptan. For the 24-hour endpoints, eletriptan was statistically significantly superior to sumatriptan, rizatriptan, almotriptan, and naratriptan for at least one of the two outcomes. Frovatriptan data were not available at that endpoint. Further, the probability that eletriptan is the most likely of all triptans to produce a favorable outcome was 68% for pain-free response at two hours, and 54% for 24-hour sustained pain-free response.
Triptans appear to offer differing treatment effects. In the populations studied eletriptan was most likely to produce pain-free responses that were sustained.
偏头痛是在发达国家最常见的神经疾病。偏头痛发作的预防性治疗对于生活质量和疾病相关成本都很重要。曲坦类药物,5-羟色胺 1B/1D 受体激动剂,在缓解偏头痛的疼痛、残疾和相关症状的同时,改善了健康相关的生活质量。尽管已经进行了许多直接的曲坦类药物头对头比较,但并非所有可能的排列组合的数据都可用,而且可能永远不会如此,尽管在临床实践中,这种信息会很有用。
我们旨在确定在以前对偏头痛治疗有充分反应的患者中,所有可用的曲坦类药物对偏头痛发作的预防性治疗的相对疗效。
我们只纳入了比较曲坦类药物与安慰剂或其他曲坦类药物的双盲随机临床试验。我们的主要结局是两小时和 24 小时无疼痛缓解,次要结局是两小时和 24 小时无头痛缓解。我们使用了贝叶斯多治疗比较荟萃分析,分析了 7 种用于成人偏头痛发作预防性治疗的曲坦类药物。我们应用了随机效应分析,并进行了剂量调整的元回归。结果以优势比和 95%可信区间报告。
我们纳入了 74 项随机临床试验的数据。所有曲坦类药物在所有结局上均显著优于安慰剂,除了那拉曲坦在 24 小时无疼痛缓解方面。依来曲普坦的治疗效果估计值始终最高。对于两小时的终点,依来曲普坦在至少一个结局上,在统计学上优于舒马曲坦、阿莫曲坦、那拉曲坦和氟伐曲坦。利扎曲普坦的治疗效果紧随其后。对于 24 小时的终点,依来曲普坦在至少一个结局上,在统计学上优于舒马曲坦、利扎曲普坦、阿莫曲坦和那拉曲坦。氟伐曲坦的数据在该终点不可用。此外,依来曲普坦是最有可能产生有利结局的曲坦类药物的概率为两小时无疼痛缓解为 68%,24 小时无持续疼痛缓解为 54%。
曲坦类药物似乎提供了不同的治疗效果。在研究人群中,依来曲普坦最有可能产生持续的无疼痛缓解。