Department of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, Munich, 81377, Germany.
German Migraine and Headache Society, Frankfurt, Germany.
J Headache Pain. 2023 Oct 10;24(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s10194-023-01676-0.
Triptans are effective for many migraine patients, but some do not experience adequate efficacy and tolerability. The European Headache Federation (EHF) has proposed that patients with lack of efficacy and/or tolerability of ≥ 2 triptans ('triptan resistance') could be considered eligible for treatment with the novel medications from the ditan and gepant groups. There is little data on the frequency of 'triptan resistance'.
We used patient self-report data from the German Migraine and Headache Society (DMKG) Headache Registry to assess triptan response and triptan efficacy and/or tolerability failure.
A total of 2284 adult migraine patients (females: 85.4%, age: 39.4 ± 12.8 years) were included. 42.5% (n = 970) had failed ≥ 1 triptan, 13.1% (n = 300) had failed ≥ 2 triptans (meeting the EHF definition of 'triptan resistance'), and 3.9% (n = 88) had failed ≥ 3 triptans. Compared to triptan responders (current use, no failure, n = 597), triptan non-responders had significantly more severe migraine (higher frequency (p < 0.001), intensity (p < 0.05), and disability (p < 0.001)), that further increased with the level of triptan failure. Responders rates were highest for nasal and oral zolmitriptan, oral eletriptan and subcutaneous sumatriptan.
In the present setting (specialized headache care in Germany), 13.1% of the patients had failed ≥ 2 triptans. Triptan failure was associated with increased migraine severity and disability, emphasizing the importance of establishing an effective and tolerable acute migraine medication. Acute treatment optimization might include switching to one of the triptans with the highest responder rates and/or to a different acute medication class.
The DMKG Headache Registry is registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS 00021081).
曲坦类药物对许多偏头痛患者有效,但有些患者的疗效和耐受性不足。欧洲头痛联合会(EHF)提出,对于疗效和/或耐受性不足≥2 种曲坦类药物的患者(“曲坦类药物抵抗”),可考虑使用新型 ditan 和 gepant 类药物治疗。关于“曲坦类药物抵抗”的频率数据很少。
我们使用德国偏头痛和头痛学会(DMKG)头痛登记处的患者自我报告数据,评估曲坦类药物的反应以及曲坦类药物的疗效和/或耐受性失败情况。
共纳入 2284 例成年偏头痛患者(女性占 85.4%,年龄为 39.4±12.8 岁)。42.5%(n=970)的患者使用过≥1 种曲坦类药物后失败,13.1%(n=300)使用过≥2 种曲坦类药物失败(符合 EHF 定义的“曲坦类药物抵抗”),3.9%(n=88)的患者使用过≥3 种曲坦类药物失败。与曲坦类药物反应者(当前使用,无失败,n=597)相比,曲坦类药物无反应者偏头痛更严重(频率更高(p<0.001)、强度更高(p<0.05)、残疾程度更高(p<0.001)),且随着曲坦类药物失败次数的增加而进一步增加。曲坦类药物反应者中,鼻内和口服佐米曲坦、口服依来曲坦和皮下舒马曲坦的反应率最高。
在本研究环境下(德国的专门头痛护理),有 13.1%的患者使用≥2 种曲坦类药物后失败。曲坦类药物失败与偏头痛严重程度和残疾程度增加有关,这强调了确定有效且耐受良好的急性偏头痛药物的重要性。急性治疗优化可能包括改用反应率最高的曲坦类药物之一和/或改用不同的急性药物类别。
DMKG 头痛登记处已在德国临床试验注册处(DRKS 00021081)注册。