Maastricht University, the Netherlands.
Behav Sci Law. 2013 Sep-Oct;31(5):531-40. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2095. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
The functioning and frailties of memory are frequently at the centerpiece of much expert testimony about the reliability of eyewitness accounts. Although we have much knowledge about how false memories and suggestibility can affect testimonies, the contributions in this special issue show that when using a sound theoretical framework, novel directions in this field can surface. The papers in this issue can broadly be divided into contributions that are related to: (1) the exact determinants of false memory and suggestibility; (2) new paradigms in legal psychology; (3) positive consequences of memory illusions; and (4) developmental false memory research. Collectively, these contributions have the potential to provide novel shifts in memory research and push this field beyond its current boundaries.
记忆的功能和脆弱性常常是专家关于目击证词可靠性的大量证词的核心。尽管我们对错误记忆和暗示性如何影响证词有了很多了解,但本期特刊中的文章表明,当使用合理的理论框架时,该领域可以出现新的方向。本期特刊中的论文大致可以分为以下几类:(1)错误记忆和暗示性的确切决定因素;(2)法律心理学的新范式;(3)记忆错觉的积极后果;和(4)发展性错误记忆研究。总的来说,这些贡献有可能为记忆研究带来新的转变,并将该领域推向超越当前边界。