• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《磁性护理要点II》在中国重症监护环境中的验证

Validation of the Essentials of Magnetism II in Chinese critical care settings.

作者信息

Bai Jinbing, Hsu Lily, Zhang Qing

机构信息

School of Nursing, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China; School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Crit Care. 2015 May;20(3):134-45. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12041. Epub 2013 Oct 7.

DOI:10.1111/nicc.12041
PMID:24118656
Abstract

AIMS

To translate and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Essentials of Magnetism II tool (EOM II) for Chinese nurses in critical care settings.

BACKGROUND

The EOM II is a reliable and valid scale for measuring the healthy work environment (HWE) for nurses in Western countries, however, it has not been validated among Chinese nurses.

METHODS

The translation of the EOM II followed internationally recognized guidelines. The Chinese version of the Essentials of Magnetism II tool (C-EOM II) was reviewed by an expert panel for culturally semantic equivalence and content validity. Then, 706 nurses from 28 intensive care units (ICUs) affiliated with 14 tertiary hospitals participated in this study. The reliability of the C-EOM II was assessed using the Cronbach's alpha coefficient; the content validity of this scale was assessed using the content validity index (CVI); and the construct validity was assessed using the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).

RESULTS

The C-EOM II showed excellent content validity with a CVI of 0·92. All the subscales of the C-EOM II were significantly correlated with overall nurse job satisfaction and nurse-assessed quality of care. The CFA showed that the C-EOM II was composed of 45 items with nine factors, accounting for 46·51% of the total variance. Cronbach's alpha coefficients for these factors ranged from 0·56 to 0·89.

CONCLUSIONS

The C-EOM II is a promising scale to assess the HWE for Chinese ICU nurses.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Nursing administrators and health care policy-makers can use the C-EOM II to evaluate clinical work environment so that a healthier work environment can be created and sustained for staff nurses.

摘要

目的

翻译并评估适用于中国重症监护病房护士的磁性要素II工具(EOM II)的心理测量特性。

背景

EOM II是用于测量西方国家护士健康工作环境(HWE)的可靠且有效的量表,然而,它尚未在中国护士中得到验证。

方法

EOM II的翻译遵循国际认可的指南。磁性要素II工具中文版(C-EOM II)由专家小组进行审查,以确保文化语义等效性和内容效度。然后,来自14家三级医院附属的28个重症监护病房(ICU)的706名护士参与了本研究。使用Cronbach's alpha系数评估C-EOM II的信度;使用内容效度指数(CVI)评估该量表的内容效度;使用验证性因素分析(CFA)评估结构效度。

结果

C-EOM II显示出出色的内容效度,CVI为0.92。C-EOM II的所有子量表均与护士总体工作满意度和护士评估的护理质量显著相关。CFA表明,C-EOM II由45个项目组成,有九个因素,占总方差的46.51%。这些因素的Cronbach's alpha系数范围为0.56至0.89。

结论

C-EOM II是评估中国ICU护士健康工作环境的一个有前景的量表。

与临床实践的相关性

护理管理人员和医疗保健政策制定者可以使用C-EOM II来评估临床工作环境,以便为护士创造并维持更健康的工作环境。

相似文献

1
Validation of the Essentials of Magnetism II in Chinese critical care settings.《磁性护理要点II》在中国重症监护环境中的验证
Nurs Crit Care. 2015 May;20(3):134-45. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12041. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
2
Work environment for Chinese nurses in different types of ICUs: a multisite cross-sectional survey.不同类型重症监护病房中国护士的工作环境:一项多中心横断面调查。
J Nurs Manag. 2015 May;23(4):498-509. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12163. Epub 2014 Jan 6.
3
Measuring the nursing work environment: translation and psychometric evaluation of the Essentials of Magnetism.衡量护理工作环境:《磁石医院标准要点》的翻译与心理测量学评估
Int Nurs Rev. 2014 Mar;61(1):99-108. doi: 10.1111/inr.12073. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
4
Essentials of a productive nurse work environment.高效护士工作环境的要素。
Nurs Res. 2008 Jan-Feb;57(1):2-13. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000280657.04008.2a.
5
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Essentials of Magnetism Scale (EOM II).土耳其版 Magnetism Scale 基本要素量表(EOM II)的有效性和可靠性。
Int Nurs Rev. 2012 Dec;59(4):570-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2012.01007.x. Epub 2012 May 21.
6
Measuring Nurse Leaders' and Direct Care Nurses' Perceptions of a Healthy Work Environment in Acute Care Settings, Part 3: Healthy Work Environment Scales for Nurse Leaders and Direct Care Nurses.测量护士领导者和直接护理护士对急性护理环境中健康工作环境的认知,第3部分:护士领导者和直接护理护士的健康工作环境量表
J Nurs Adm. 2017 Mar;47(3):140-146. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000456.
7
Psychometric testing of the Chinese version of nursing practice environment scale.护理实践环境量表中文版的心理测量学测试。
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Mar;18(6):919-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02433.x. Epub 2008 Nov 12.
8
Validation of the Spanish version of the questionnaire Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index.护理工作指数实践环境量表西班牙语版的验证。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Feb;50(2):274-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
9
Comparison of nurse practice environments in Denmark and the USA.丹麦与美国护士执业环境的比较。
Int Nurs Rev. 2015 Dec;62(4):479-88. doi: 10.1111/inr.12208. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
10
Development and evaluation of essentials of magnetism tool.
J Nurs Adm. 2004 Jul-Aug;34(7-8):365-78. doi: 10.1097/00005110-200407000-00010.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors associated with burnout and job satisfaction in Chinese hospital pharmacists.中国医院药剂师职业倦怠与工作满意度的相关因素
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Aug 28;99(35):e21919. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021919.
2
Registered nurses' perceptions and experiences of autonomy: a descriptive phenomenological study.注册护士对自主性的认知与体验:一项描述性现象学研究。
BMC Nurs. 2019 Nov 1;18:51. doi: 10.1186/s12912-019-0378-3. eCollection 2019.