Pearl Monica S, Torok Collin M, Messina Steven A, Radvany Martin, Rao Swati N, Ehtiati Tina, Thompson Carol B, Gailloud Philippe
Division of Interventional Neuroradiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
J Neurointerv Surg. 2014 Nov;6(9):672-6. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010914. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
Three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography (3D-DSA) is a modern technique that allows for better appreciation of complex vascular lesions. This study evaluates the impact of various dose reduction strategies on 3D-DSA image quality.
The standard manufacturer 5 s 0.36 μGy/frame setting was modified to create lower dose 3D-DSA protocols by varying the acquisition time (5 or 3 s) and/or dose per frame (0.36, 0.24, 0.17, and 0.10 μGy/f). All protocols were evaluated in three swine. Four raters measured a segment of the external carotid artery on two-dimensional multiplanar reconstruction images. The raters were also presented with three-dimensional volume rendered images from all protocols in a blinded manner and asked to choose the superior image. A full model analysis of variance with repeated measure factors was performed to compare mean differences in measurements between protocols.
Measurement differences between the standard and low dose protocols were not clinically significant (<0.5 mm). All raters demonstrated high inter-rater reliability. The 5 s protocols were considered as qualitatively superior to the 3 s protocols. Delivered system doses ranged from 43.8 to 6.5 mGy. The 5 s 0.10 μGy/frame protocols generated 65-68% less delivered dose compared with the 5 s 0.36 μGy/frame setting.
Low dose 3D-DSA protocols with preserved image quality are achievable, and can help reduce unnecessary radiation exposure to both patients and operators. The 5 s low dose protocols generated clinically acceptable and superior images compared with the 3 s protocols, suggesting a more important role for acquisition time than dose per frame to maintain image quality.
三维数字减影血管造影(3D-DSA)是一种现代技术,能更好地显示复杂血管病变。本研究评估了各种剂量降低策略对3D-DSA图像质量的影响。
通过改变采集时间(5秒或3秒)和/或每帧剂量(0.36、0.24、0.17和0.10μGy/帧),对标准的制造商5秒0.36μGy/帧设置进行修改,以创建低剂量3D-DSA方案。所有方案均在三头猪身上进行评估。四名评估者在二维多平面重建图像上测量颈外动脉的一段。评估者还以盲法方式获得所有方案的三维容积再现图像,并要求选择 superior 图像。进行了具有重复测量因素的全模型方差分析,以比较各方案之间测量值的平均差异。
标准方案和低剂量方案之间的测量差异在临床上无显著意义(<0.5毫米)。所有评估者均表现出较高的评估者间可靠性。5秒方案在质量上被认为优于3秒方案。系统输送剂量范围为43.8至6.5 mGy。与5秒0.36μGy/帧设置相比,5秒0.10μGy/帧方案产生的输送剂量减少了65%-68%。
可以实现具有保留图像质量的低剂量3D-DSA方案,并且可以帮助减少对患者和操作者的不必要辐射暴露。与3秒方案相比,5秒低剂量方案产生了临床上可接受的 superior 图像,这表明采集时间比每帧剂量在维持图像质量方面起着更重要的作用。