Suppr超能文献

使用放大技术的龈下刮治和根面平整疗效的原子力显微镜和扫描电子显微镜评估:一项随机对照临床研究。

Atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy evaluation of efficacy of scaling and root planing using magnification: A randomized controlled clinical study.

作者信息

Mohan Ranjana, Agrawal Sudhanshu, Gundappa Mohan

机构信息

Department of Periodontics, Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College and Research Centre, Moradabad, India.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Dent. 2013 Jul;4(3):286-94. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.118347.

Abstract

AIM

A randomized controlled clinical study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of scaling and root planing (SRP) by using Magnifying Loupes (ML) and dental operating microscope (DOM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 90 human teeth scheduled for extraction from 18 patients aged between 25 and 65 years suffering from generalized chronic severe periodontitis were randomly assigned to three treatment groups. Group 1 consisted SRP performed without using magnification (unaided), Group 2-SRP with ML and Group 3-SRP with DOM. Following extractions, samples were prepared for (i) evaluation of surface topography by atomic force microscopy, (ii) presence of smear layer, debris by scanning electron microscopy (iii) elemental analysis by energy dispersive X-ray analysis. Data was subjected to statistical analysis using analysis of variance, post-hoc (Tukey-HSD) and Chi-square test.

RESULTS

Statistically significant (P < 0.001) difference was found among the different treatment groups. Group 3 was the best while Group 1 was the least effective technique for SRP. Order of efficacy in terms of the surface was found to be - Palatal < Lingual < Distal ≃ Mesial < Buccal. Efficiency in mandibular to maxillary teeth was found to be significant (P < 0.05), also anterior to posterior teeth (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Magnification tools significantly enhance the efficacy of supragingival and subgingival SRP.

摘要

目的

开展一项随机对照临床研究,以评估使用放大镜(ML)和牙科手术显微镜(DOM)进行龈下刮治术和根面平整术(SRP)的效果。

材料与方法

从18名年龄在25至65岁之间患有广泛性慢性重度牙周炎的患者中,选取90颗计划拔除的人类牙齿,随机分为三个治疗组。第1组为不使用放大设备进行SRP(徒手操作),第2组为使用ML进行SRP,第3组为使用DOM进行SRP。拔牙后,制备样本用于(i)通过原子力显微镜评估表面形貌,(ii)通过扫描电子显微镜观察玷污层和碎屑的存在情况,(iii)通过能量色散X射线分析进行元素分析。数据采用方差分析、事后检验(Tukey-HSD)和卡方检验进行统计分析。

结果

不同治疗组之间存在统计学显著差异(P < 0.001)。第3组是SRP效果最佳的组,而第1组是效果最差的技术。就表面而言,疗效顺序为 - 腭侧 < 舌侧 < 远中 ≃ 近中 < 颊侧。下颌牙与上颌牙的效率差异显著(P < 0.05),前牙与后牙之间也存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。

结论

放大工具显著提高了龈上和龈下SRP的疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f088/3793547/0344242fc0f8/CCD-4-286-g002.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验