Urs Arun N, Martinelli Massimo, Rao Prithviraj, Thomson Mike A
*Centre for Paediatric Gastroenterology and International Academy of Pediatric Endoscopy Training, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK †Department of Paediatrics, University of Naples "Federico II," Naples, Italy.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014 Feb;58(2):204-12. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000192.
Diagnostic and therapeutic benefits of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) have been documented in adults, with few data available on pediatric patients. We evaluated the diagnostic and therapeutic utility of DBE in children.
A prospective assessment of 113 DBE procedures in 58 consecutive children younger than 18 years (36 boys, 22 girls; median age 12.7 years, range 1-18 years) was performed for a variety of suspected small bowel (SB) disorders from January 2008 to August 2012 in a tertiary referral center for pediatric patients. All of the children had undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and ileocolonoscopy. A total of 19 patients had undergone radiological investigations for SB (n = 11 magnetic resonance imaging; n = 5 barium enterography; n = 3 computed tomography) and 54 patients had undergone wireless capsule endoscopy (WCE).
The overall median (range) examination time was 92.5 (45-275) minutes. The median (range) estimated insertion length of SB distal to pylorus was 230 (80-450) cm and proximal to ileocecal valve was 80 (5-275) cm. The common indications for DBE were polyposis syndromes (n = 21) and obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 16). The findings included polyps (n = 19), mucosal ulcers and erosions (n = 8), submucosal elevations with white nodules (n = 4), and angioma/angiodysplasia (n = 2). The overall diagnostic yield for SB lesions using DBE was 70.7% (41/58) and for WCE was 77.7% (42/54). Endotherapeutic intervention was successfully used in 46.5% (n = 27/58). The endoscopic, medical, and surgical contributions to change in management by DBE were 72.4% (n = 42/58). Three complications (5.2%) were noted with uneventful recovery.
The diagnostic yield of DBE was comparable to WCE, but with the addition of therapeutic possibility and histological yield. We believe this technique could be a valuable addition to existing endoscopic techniques, complementary to WCE, and may be considered as an alternative diagnostic and therapeutic option in the SB in children.
双气囊小肠镜检查(DBE)在成人中的诊断和治疗益处已有文献记载,但关于儿科患者的数据较少。我们评估了DBE在儿童中的诊断和治疗效用。
对2008年1月至2012年8月期间在一家儿科三级转诊中心连续58名18岁以下儿童(36名男孩,22名女孩;中位年龄12.7岁,范围1 - 18岁)进行的113例DBE手术进行前瞻性评估,这些儿童患有各种疑似小肠(SB)疾病。所有儿童均接受过上消化道内镜检查和回结肠镜检查。共有19例患者接受了小肠的放射学检查(n = 11磁共振成像;n = 5钡剂小肠造影;n = 3计算机断层扫描),54例患者接受了无线胶囊内镜检查(WCE)。
总体中位(范围)检查时间为92.5(45 - 275)分钟。幽门远端小肠的中位(范围)估计插入长度为230(80 - 450)cm,回盲瓣近端为80(5 - 275)cm。DBE的常见适应证为息肉病综合征(n = 21)和不明原因的胃肠道出血(n = 16)。检查结果包括息肉(n = 19)、黏膜溃疡和糜烂(n = 8)、伴有白色结节的黏膜下隆起(n = 4)以及血管瘤/血管发育异常(n = 2)。使用DBE对小肠病变的总体诊断率为70.7%(41/58),WCE为77.7%(42/54)。46.5%(n = 27/58)的患者成功进行了内镜治疗干预。DBE在内镜、药物和手术方面对治疗方案改变的贡献为(72.4%)(n = 42/58)。记录到3例并发症(5.2%),但恢复顺利。
DBE的诊断率与WCE相当,但增加了治疗可能性和组织学诊断率。我们认为这项技术可能是现有内镜技术的有价值补充,是WCE的补充,并且可被视为儿童小肠疾病的一种替代诊断和治疗选择。