障碍与边界:精神遗传学与分类学。
Disorders and borders: psychiatric genetics and nosology.
机构信息
Psychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit and Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
出版信息
Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2013 Oct;162B(7):559-78. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32174.
Over the past century, the definition and classification of psychiatric disorders has evolved through a combination of historical trends, clinical observations, and empirical research. The current nosology, instantiated in the DSM-5 and ICD-10, rests on descriptive criteria agreed upon by a consensus of experts. While the development of explicit criteria has enhanced the reliability of diagnosis, the validity of the current diagnostic categories has been the subject of debate and controversy. Genetic studies have long been regarded as a key resource for validating the boundaries among diagnostic categories. Genetic epidemiologic studies have documented the familiality and heritability of clinically defined psychiatric disorders and molecular genetic studies have begun to identify specific susceptibility variants. At the same time, there is growing evidence from family, twin and genomic studies that genetic influences on psychiatric disorders transcend clinical boundaries. Here I review this evidence for cross-disorder genetic effects and discuss the implications of these findings for psychiatric nosology. Psychiatric genetic research can inform a bottom-up reappraisal of psychopathology that may help the field move beyond a purely descriptive classification and toward an etiology-based nosology.
在过去的一个世纪里,精神障碍的定义和分类经历了历史趋势、临床观察和实证研究的结合而不断发展。目前的分类学,体现在 DSM-5 和 ICD-10 中,基于专家共识达成的描述性标准。虽然明确标准的制定提高了诊断的可靠性,但当前诊断类别的有效性一直是争论和争议的主题。遗传研究一直被认为是验证诊断类别之间界限的重要资源。遗传流行病学研究记录了临床定义的精神障碍的家族性和遗传性,分子遗传学研究已经开始识别特定的易感性变异。与此同时,越来越多的来自家庭、双胞胎和基因组研究的证据表明,精神障碍的遗传影响超越了临床界限。在这里,我回顾了这些跨障碍遗传效应的证据,并讨论了这些发现对精神障碍分类学的意义。精神遗传学研究可以为精神病理学提供自下而上的重新评估,这可能有助于该领域超越纯粹的描述性分类,走向基于病因的分类学。