Thornton Kate E, Sayers Mark G L
from the School of Health and Sport Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast , Maroochydore, Queensland , Australia .
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Apr-Jun;18(2):201-6. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.836264. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
Preemployment testing is utilized by many ambulance services. Surprisingly, there is limited published research on the efficacy of this testing in determining an employee's ability to complete the requirements of this physically demanding occupation.
The purpose of this study was to analyze the preemployment fitness test results from a 4-year cohort of paramedic students from an Australian university. To date, no published studies have reported on the fitness test scores for paramedic students or on whether overall test score is biased toward any particular test components. Similarly, no data have been presented on whether there are gender differences in scores for individual test components or overall test score.
Retrospective cohort study of de-identified data from 4 years of data from Paramedic Science students (n = 251) (mean age = 24.9 years). Data were recorded from the Queensland Ambulance Service (QAS) Health Related Fitness Test (HRFT), a preemployment fitness test used by an Australian state ambulance service. HRFT score is calculated out of a possible 100 points and is based on performance scores in nine component fitness tests. Raw test scores for each of these component tests are ranked on a 0-4 scale prior to these data being scaled and summed to generate the overall HRFT score. An overall score >24.99 is awarded a "Pass." Results. Five individuals failed to "Pass" the HRFT. Overall HRFT scores were influenced significantly by performance in the strength tests, with males also recording significantly (p < 0.005) higher scores in all of the strength tests than females. Similarly, approximately 40% of the female participants, compared to 6% of males, achieved an overall test "Pass" and yet gained a ranked score of 0 in at least three of the component tests.
It was concluded that the scoring system did not exclude participants with poor fitness levels, as many participants recorded low scores in several test components yet still passed the test. We recommend that before redesigning the HRFT, studies should be first conducted on the occupational demands and physical standards required for this important profession.
许多救护车服务机构都会进行入职前测试。令人惊讶的是,关于这种测试在确定员工能否满足这一体力要求较高职业的要求方面的功效,已发表的研究有限。
本研究的目的是分析一所澳大利亚大学四年制护理专业学生队列的入职前体能测试结果。迄今为止,尚无已发表的研究报告护理专业学生的体能测试成绩,也未报告总体测试成绩是否偏向任何特定测试项目。同样,也没有数据表明各个测试项目的成绩或总体测试成绩是否存在性别差异。
对护理专业学生(n = 251)(平均年龄 = 24.9岁)四年数据进行回顾性队列研究,数据已去识别化。数据来自昆士兰救护车服务(QAS)健康相关体能测试(HRFT),这是澳大利亚一个州的救护车服务机构使用的入职前体能测试。HRFT分数满分为100分,基于九项体能测试项目的表现得分计算得出。在对这些数据进行缩放和求和以得出总体HRFT分数之前,每个分项测试的原始分数按0至4的等级进行排名。总分>24.99为“通过”。结果。有五个人未能“通过”HRFT。总体HRFT分数受力量测试表现的显著影响,男性在所有力量测试中的得分也显著高于女性(p < 0.005)。同样,约40%的女性参与者与6%的男性参与者相比,总体测试“通过”,但在至少三项分项测试中排名为0。
得出的结论是,评分系统并未排除体能水平较差的参与者,因为许多参与者在几个测试项目中得分较低但仍通过了测试。我们建议在重新设计HRFT之前,应首先对这一重要职业所需的职业要求和体能标准进行研究。