Li Yibing, Hao Dingjun, He Baorong, Wang Xiaodong, Yan Liang
Spine Surgery Department of Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaan'xi Province, China.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015 Dec;28(10):398-403. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000032.
A prospective controlled study.
The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of the zero-profile device with that of an anterior cervical plate and cage in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
A series of studies have indicated that anterior instruments produce good clinical results during ACDF. However, common implants are associated with a high rate of postoperative complications. A cervical stand-alone cage with integrated fixation for zero-profile segmental stabilization has been developed to solve this problem.
A total of 46 patients with cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy were randomly treated with an anterior plate and a cage or a new zero-profile implant between September 2009 and April 2010. Patients were followed for 2 years. The operation time, blood loss, exposure to radiation, the Japan Department of Orthopedics Association (JOA) score, pain Visual Analogue Score (VAS), and dysphagia score were recorded.
The operation was completed successfully in 46 patients. Twenty-three patients received an anterior plate and cage (control group) and 23 patients received the new zero-profile implant (test group). Analysis of postoperative data at all protocol-defined intervals demonstrated improvement in all clinical outcomes for both the groups when compared with the corresponding preoperative data. No significant difference in VAS and JOA score was found in the 2 treatment groups. The test group had a greater reduction in dysphagia at all follow-up intervals, compared with the control group. No adjacent segment degeneration was found in the test group, whereas 4 patients in the control group developed degeneration in adjacent segments (P=0.045). Both the groups had no adverse events associated with the implant or implant surgery.
The Zero-P implant is a viable alternative to ACDF in patients with persistently symptomatic, single-level cervical disk disease. The procedure requires more technical requirements than traditional plates.
前瞻性对照研究。
本研究旨在比较零切迹装置与前路颈椎钢板及椎间融合器在接受颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)患者中的安全性和有效性。
一系列研究表明,前路器械在ACDF手术中可产生良好的临床效果。然而,常用植入物与较高的术后并发症发生率相关。为解决这一问题,已研发出一种用于零切迹节段稳定的一体式固定颈椎独立椎间融合器。
2009年9月至2010年4月期间,共46例患有神经根型颈椎病或脊髓型颈椎病的患者被随机分为两组,分别接受前路钢板及椎间融合器或新型零切迹植入物治疗。对患者进行2年的随访。记录手术时间、失血量、辐射暴露量、日本骨科协会(JOA)评分、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)及吞咽困难评分。
46例患者手术均成功完成。23例患者接受前路钢板及椎间融合器(对照组),23例患者接受新型零切迹植入物(试验组)。与相应术前数据相比,在所有方案规定的随访间隔对术后数据进行分析时,两组的所有临床结局均有改善。两个治疗组在VAS和JOA评分方面无显著差异。与对照组相比,试验组在所有随访间隔时吞咽困难的减轻程度更大。试验组未发现相邻节段退变,而对照组有4例患者出现相邻节段退变(P = 0.045)。两组均未发生与植入物或植入手术相关的不良事件。
对于持续有症状的单节段颈椎间盘疾病患者,零切迹植入物是ACDF的一种可行替代方案。该手术比传统钢板需要更多的技术要求。