• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[ROI-C与前路钢板联合传统椎间融合器用于颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的比较]

[Comparison of ROI-C and traditional cage with anterior plating for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion].

作者信息

Wang Zhiwen, Jiang Weimin, Zhang Zongyu, Wang Heng, Li Xuefeng, Shi Jinhui, Chen Jie, Yang Huilin

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.

Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China. Email:

出版信息

Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Jun;52(6):425-30.

PMID:25219557
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study clinical outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using ROI-C compared to traditional cage with anterior plating in treating the cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

METHODS

A total of 66 patients with the cervical spondylotic myelopathy were treated with ACDF between April 2011 and October 2012. Twenty-three patients underwent ACDF using the ROI-C device were classified as the ROI-C group and 43 patients received traditional cage with anterior plating served as the titanium plate group. Related indicators, such as operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, incidence of postoperative dysphagia and ratio of bone graft fusion were recorded and compared between two groups. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. The pre- and postoperative results were compared with a paired sample t-test. The results between groups were compared utilizing the grouped t-test or χ² test.

RESULTS

All cases were followed up. The follow-up period was 12 to 38 months and 14 to 39 months in ROI-C group and titanium plate group respectively. For the age, gender, the JOA scores, VAS scores of neck pain and arm pain during preoperative, the surgical level constituent ratio and the follow-up time, there were no significant differences between two groups. In ROI-C group, the operation time was (123 ± 38) minutes, intraoperative blood loss was (84 ± 37)ml, exposure times to the X-ray C-arm machine was (3.5 ± 0.7) times, which were all significantly lower than titanium plate group ((165 ± 60) minutes, (128 ± 66) ml, (5.9 ± 1.2) times respectively, t = -3.27, -3.25, - 9.45, P = 0.02, 0.02, 0.00). The mean JOA scores increased significantly from pre-surgery to 1 month postoperatively, 3 months postoperatively, and last follow-up in ROI-C group (t = 11.94, 11.32, 10.60, all P = 0.00) and titanium plate group(t = 15.07, 19.51, 17.55, all P = 0.00). The mean VAS scores of neck pain and arm pain decreased significantly from pre-surgery to 1 month postoperatively, 3 months postoperatively, and last follow-up in ROI-C group (t = -16.64-- 9.68, all P = 0.00) and titanium group(t = -16.56--12.38, all P = 0.00). There was no significant difference on JOA scores and VAS scores of neck pain and arm pain between the two groups at the same time (P > 0.05). However, significant difference was observed in incidence of postoperative dysphagia (χ² = 6.79, P = 0.01). In addition, bony fusion was obtained in all cases at the last follow-up postoperatively. There was no significant difference on ratio of bone graft fusion between two groups.

CONCLUSION

The ROI-C leads to similar clinical outcomes compared to traditional cage combined with anterior plating for the treatment of the cervical spondylotic myelopathy, while the ROI-C carries a simpler operation, shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, less exposure times to the X-ray and a lower risk of postoperative dysphagia.

摘要

目的

研究采用ROI-C进行颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)与传统椎间融合器联合前路钢板治疗脊髓型颈椎病的临床疗效。

方法

2011年4月至2012年10月期间,共有66例脊髓型颈椎病患者接受了ACDF治疗。23例行ROI-C器械ACDF的患者被归为ROI-C组,43例接受传统椎间融合器联合前路钢板治疗的患者作为钛板组。记录并比较两组的相关指标,如手术时间、术中出血量、术中透视次数、术后吞咽困难发生率及植骨融合率。采用日本骨科学会(JOA)评分和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分评估临床疗效。术前和术后结果采用配对样本t检验进行比较。组间结果采用成组t检验或χ²检验进行比较。

结果

所有病例均获随访。ROI-C组和钛板组的随访时间分别为12至38个月和14至39个月。在年龄、性别、术前JOA评分、颈部疼痛和手臂疼痛的VAS评分、手术节段构成比及随访时间方面,两组间无显著差异。ROI-C组的手术时间为(123±38)分钟,术中出血量为(84±37)ml,X线C形臂机暴露次数为(3.5±0.7)次,均显著低于钛板组(分别为(165±60)分钟、(128±66)ml、(5.9±1.2)次,t=-3.27、-3.25、-9.45,P=0.02、0.02、0.00)。ROI-C组和钛板组从术前到术后1个月、术后3个月及末次随访时JOA平均评分均显著增加(ROI-C组:t=11.94、11.32、10.60,P均=0.00;钛板组:t=15.07、19.51、17.55,P均=0.00)。ROI-C组和钛板组从术前到术后1个月、术后3个月及末次随访时颈部疼痛和手臂疼痛的VAS平均评分均显著降低(ROI-C组:t=-16.64至-9.68,P均=0.00;钛板组:t=-16.56至-12.38,P均=0.00)。两组在同一时间的JOA评分及颈部疼痛和手臂疼痛的VAS评分无显著差异(P>0.05)。然而,术后吞咽困难发生率存在显著差异(χ²=6.79,P=0.01)。此外,所有病例术后末次随访时均获得了骨性融合。两组间植骨融合率无显著差异。

结论

与传统椎间融合器联合前路钢板治疗脊髓型颈椎病相比,ROI-C具有相似的临床疗效,同时手术操作更简单,手术时间更短,术中出血量更少,X线暴露次数更少,术后吞咽困难风险更低。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of ROI-C and traditional cage with anterior plating for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion].[ROI-C与前路钢板联合传统椎间融合器用于颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的比较]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Jun;52(6):425-30.
2
Comparison of a zero-profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) and the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages with an anterior plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.零轮廓锚定椎间融合器(ROI-C)与聚醚醚酮(PEEK)椎间融合器联合前路钢板用于多节段脊髓型颈椎病前路椎间盘切除融合术的比较。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jun;25(6):1881-90. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4500-x. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
3
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a zero-profile integrated plate and spacer device: a clinical and radiological study: Clinical article.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术联合零切迹一体化板和间隔器装置:一项临床和影像学研究:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Oct;21(4):529-37. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.SPINE12951. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
4
Three-level and four-level anterior cervical discectomies and titanium cage-augmented fusion with and without plate fixation.三级和四级颈椎前路椎间盘切除术以及带或不带钢板固定的钛笼增强融合术。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2004 Sep;1(2):160-7. doi: 10.3171/spi.2004.1.2.0160.
5
[Contrastive analysis of neck axial symptoms after hybrid surgery or traditional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treatment of two-level cervical disease].[混合手术或传统前路颈椎间盘切除融合术治疗双节段颈椎病后颈部轴向症状的对比分析]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Jan;27(1):58-61.
6
A comparison of local bone graft with PEEK cage versus iliac bone graft used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.局部骨移植联合聚醚醚酮椎间融合器与髂骨移植在前路颈椎间盘切除融合术中的比较。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017 Apr;155:30-35. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
7
Anterior corpectomy with iliac bone fusion or discectomy with interbody titanium cage fusion for multilevel cervical degenerated disc disease.前路椎体次全切除髂骨融合术或椎间盘切除术联合椎间钛笼融合术治疗多节段颈椎间盘退变疾病
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007 Dec;20(8):565-70. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318036b463.
8
Does rigid instrumentation increase the fusion rate in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?在单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术中,使用坚强内固定是否会提高融合率?
Spine J. 2004 Nov-Dec;4(6):636-43. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.04.010.
9
[Efficacy comparison of zero-profile intervertebral fusion and stand-alone interbody cage combined with cage-titanium plate construct in treatment of two-segment skip cervical spondylosis].零切迹椎间融合与单纯椎间融合器联合钛板治疗双节段跳跃型颈椎病的疗效比较
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022 May 24;102(19):1450-1457. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20220128-00208.
10
Early follow-up outcomes of a new zero-profile implant used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.一种用于颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的新型零轮廓植入物的早期随访结果。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013 Jul;26(5):E193-7. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31827a2812.

引用本文的文献

1
Integral Fixation Titanium/Polyetheretherketone Cages for Cervical Arthrodesis: Evolution of Cage Design and Early Radiological Outcomes and Fusion Rates.用于颈椎融合术的一体化固定钛/聚醚醚酮椎间融合器:椎间融合器设计的演变、早期影像学结果及融合率
Orthop Surg. 2019 Feb;11(1):52-59. doi: 10.1111/os.12413. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
2
Clinical effects of the bridge-type ROI-C interbody fusion cage system in the treatment of cervical spondylosis with osteoporosis.桥型 ROI-C 椎间融合 cage 系统治疗伴骨质疏松的颈椎病的临床疗效。
Clin Interv Aging. 2018 Dec 14;13:2543-2551. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S182969. eCollection 2018.
3
Titanium/Polyetheretherketone Cages for Cervical Arthrodesis with Degenerative and Traumatic Pathologies: Early Clinical Outcomes and Fusion Rates.
用于治疗颈椎退变和创伤性疾病的钛/聚醚醚酮椎间融合器:早期临床疗效及融合率
Orthop Surg. 2016 Feb;8(1):19-26. doi: 10.1111/os.12221.
4
Operative strategy and clinical outcomes of ROI-C(TM) fusion device in the treatment of Hangman's fracture.ROI-C(TM)融合器治疗枢椎椎弓根骨折的手术策略及临床疗效
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Oct 15;8(10):18665-72. eCollection 2015.