Suppr超能文献

食管动力障碍性失弛缓症。

Esophageal motility disorder achalasia.

作者信息

Richter Joel E

机构信息

Joy McCann Culverhouse, Center for Esophageal and Swallowing Disorders, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Dec;21(6):535-42. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e3283658f4f.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although not a common disease, the last several years have had exciting breakthroughs in better defining the pathophysiology of achalasia, classifying the disease with high-resolution manometry and potentially exciting new treatments.

RECENT FINDINGS

The introduction of high-resolution manometry with detailed assessment of lower esophageal sphincter function and peristalsis has made it possible to classify achalasia into three subtypes. This becomes clinically important as patients with type II achalasia do best with both pneumatic dilation and surgical myotomy, whereas type III achalasia may respond better to surgery. The first multicenter randomized controlled trial published by the European Achalasia Trial group reported similar excellent outcomes over a 2-year follow-up with both pneumatic dilation and laparoscopic myotomy in a study involving nearly 200 achalasia patients. Although longer follow-up is required, this supports the continued use of pneumatic dilation for treating achalasia. Finally, the novel endoscopic technique of peroral endoscopic myotomy is a promising new treatment option for achalasia, but it requires increased experiences and careful evaluation before widespread application.

SUMMARY

These are exciting times in the diagnosis and treatment of achalasia, which will definitely improve patient treatment outcomes. However, we still await breakthroughs in the basic science arena to identify the actual cause of achalasia.

摘要

综述目的

尽管贲门失弛缓症并非常见疾病,但在过去几年中,在更好地明确其病理生理学、通过高分辨率测压对该疾病进行分类以及探索可能令人兴奋的新治疗方法方面取得了令人振奋的突破。

最新发现

高分辨率测压技术的引入,能够详细评估食管下括约肌功能和蠕动情况,从而将贲门失弛缓症分为三种亚型。这在临床上具有重要意义,因为II型贲门失弛缓症患者接受气囊扩张和手术肌切开术的效果最佳,而III型贲门失弛缓症患者可能对手术反应更好。欧洲贲门失弛缓症试验组发表的第一项多中心随机对照试验报告称,在一项涉及近200名贲门失弛缓症患者的研究中,经过2年的随访,气囊扩张和腹腔镜肌切开术的效果都非常好。尽管需要更长时间的随访,但这支持继续使用气囊扩张术治疗贲门失弛缓症。最后,经口内镜肌切开术这种新型内镜技术是治疗贲门失弛缓症的一种有前景的新选择,但在广泛应用之前需要更多经验和仔细评估。

总结

目前是贲门失弛缓症诊断和治疗的激动人心的时期,这肯定会改善患者的治疗效果。然而,我们仍在等待基础科学领域的突破,以确定贲门失弛缓症的实际病因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验