Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rzeszow University of Technology, W. Pola 2, 35-959, Rzeszow, Poland,
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2013 Dec;51(12):1357-65. doi: 10.1007/s11517-013-1108-8. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
The aim of this article was to compare gene expression programming (GEP) method with three types of neural networks in the prediction of adverse events of radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients. One-hundred and seven patients treated by radical hysterectomy were analyzed. Each record representing a single patient consisted of 10 parameters. The occurrence and lack of perioperative complications imposed a two-class classification problem. In the simulations, GEP algorithm was compared to a multilayer perceptron (MLP), a radial basis function network neural, and a probabilistic neural network. The generalization ability of the models was assessed on the basis of their accuracy, the sensitivity, the specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The GEP classifier provided best results in the prediction of the adverse events with the accuracy of 71.96 %. Comparable but slightly worse outcomes were obtained using MLP, i.e., 71.87 %. For each of measured indices: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the AUROC, the standard deviation was the smallest for the models generated by GEP classifier.
本文旨在比较基因表达编程(GEP)方法与三种类型的神经网络在预测宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术后不良事件中的应用。对 107 例接受根治性子宫切除术的患者进行了分析。每个记录代表一个单一的患者,由 10 个参数组成。手术并发症的发生与否导致了一个二分类问题。在模拟中,GEP 算法与多层感知器(MLP)、径向基函数网络和概率神经网络进行了比较。基于准确性、敏感性、特异性和接收者操作特征曲线下的面积(AUROC),评估了模型的泛化能力。GEP 分类器在预测不良事件方面提供了最佳结果,准确率为 71.96%。使用 MLP 获得了类似但略差的结果,即 71.87%。对于每个测量指标:准确性、敏感性、特异性和 AUROC,GEP 分类器生成的模型的标准偏差最小。