Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: What are the levels of evidence on which we base decisions for surgical management of lower extremity bone tumors?
作者信息
Leopold Seth S
机构信息
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1600 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19013, USA,
出版信息
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jan;472(1):3-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3332-9. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: What are the levels of evidence on which we base decisions for surgical management of lower extremity bone tumors?编辑聚焦/五分钟速览：我们在做出下肢骨肿瘤手术治疗决策时所依据的证据级别有哪些？
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jan;472(1):3-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3332-9. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
2
What are the levels of evidence on which we base decisions for surgical management of lower extremity bone tumors?我们基于哪些证据级别来做出下肢骨肿瘤外科治疗决策？
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jan;472(1):8-15. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3311-1. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
3
Limb-Salvage Options in Growing Children with Malignant Bone Tumors of the Lower Extremity: A Critical Analysis Review.下肢恶性骨肿瘤患儿的保肢选择：一项批判性分析综述
JBJS Rev. 2017 Jul;5(7):e7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.16.00026.
4
Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Prophylactic stabilization for bone metastases, myeloma, or lymphoma: do we need to protect the entire bone? (DOI 10.1007/s11999-012-2656-1).编辑聚焦/五分钟速览：骨转移、骨髓瘤或淋巴瘤的预防性固定：我们需要保护整个骨骼吗？（DOI 10.1007/s11999-012-2656-1）
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Mar;471(3):703-5. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2714-8.
5
Writing a case report: an editor's eye view.撰写病例报告：编辑视角
Hosp Med. 2000 Dec;61(12):863-4. doi: 10.12968/hosp.2000.61.12.2387.
6
Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Eligibility Criteria for Lower-Extremity Joint Replacement May Worsen Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities.编辑聚焦/速览：下肢关节置换的 eligibility criteria 可能会加剧种族和社会经济差异。
注：原文中“Eligibility Criteria”未翻译，因为不清楚其准确意思，需结合具体医学内容确定合适译法，比如“入选标准”“合格标准”等 。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Dec;476(12):2297-2300. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000522.
7
An Editor's exit. Editor's-in-Chief of 21 years reflections.一位主编的离任。21年主编生涯的反思。
J Refract Surg. 2010 Oct;26(10):698-702. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20100924-01.
8
An autologus lower limb prosthesis.一种自体下肢假肢。
Ceylon Med J. 2009 Sep;54(3):99-100. doi: 10.4038/cmj.v54i3.1207.
9
Lower-limb preservation with an expandable endoprosthesis after tumor resection in children: is the cup half full or half empty? Commentary on an article by Eric R. Henderson, MD, et al.: "Outcome of lower-limb preservation with an expandable endoprosthesis after bone tumor resection in children".儿童肿瘤切除术后使用可扩张型人工关节假体进行下肢保肢：是乐观还是悲观？对医学博士埃里克·R·亨德森等人所著文章《儿童骨肿瘤切除术后使用可扩张型人工关节假体进行下肢保肢的结果》的评论
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Mar 21;94(6):e39. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01643.
10
Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Conditional survival greater than overall survival at diagnosis for Ewing's and osteosarcoma.编辑聚焦/五分钟速览：尤因肉瘤和骨肉瘤诊断时的条件生存率高于总生存率。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Nov;471(11):3395-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3247-5. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
引用本文的文献
1
Moving Forward Through Consensus: A Modified Delphi Approach to Determine the Top Research Priorities in Orthopaedic Oncology.通过共识推进：一种改进的德尔菲法确定骨肿瘤学的首要研究重点
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Dec;475(12):3044-3055. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5482-7. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
2
Moving forward through consensus: protocol for a modified Delphi approach to determine the top research priorities in the field of orthopaedic oncology.通过共识推进：一种改进的德尔菲法协议，用于确定骨肿瘤学领域的首要研究重点
BMJ Open. 2016 May 24;6(5):e011780. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011780.
本文引用的文献
1
What are the levels of evidence on which we base decisions for surgical management of lower extremity bone tumors?我们基于哪些证据级别来做出下肢骨肿瘤外科治疗决策？
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jan;472(1):8-15. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3311-1. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
2
Prophylactic antibiotic regimens in tumour surgery (PARITY): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled study.肿瘤外科预防性抗生素方案（PARITY）：一项多中心随机对照研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2012 Nov 28;2(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002197. Print 2012.
3
Randomized trials in orthopaedic surgery: one step closer.骨科手术中的随机试验：又近了一步。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jul 18;94 Suppl 1:1. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00311.
4
Design, conduct, and interpretation of nonrandomized orthopaedic studies: a practical approach. (All) evidence matters.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 May;91 Suppl 3:1. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01747.
5
Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography.评估流行病学观察性研究质量及偏倚易感性的工具：系统评价与注释书目
Int J Epidemiol. 2007 Jun;36(3):666-76. doi: 10.1093/ije/dym018. Epub 2007 Apr 30.
6
Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies.评估非随机干预研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(27):iii-x, 1-173. doi: 10.3310/hta7270.
Zotero 插件