Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa; MD/PhD Program, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Ky.
University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Ky.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 May;147(5):1660-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.08.044. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
Counterpulsation with an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) has not achieved the same success or clinical use in pediatric patients as in adults. In a pediatric animal model, IABP efficacy was investigated to determine whether IABP timing with a high-fidelity blood pressure signal may improve counterpulsation therapy versus a low-fidelity signal.
In Yorkshire piglets (n = 19; weight, 13.0 ± 0.5 kg) with coronary ligation-induced acute ischemic left ventricular failure, pediatric IABPs (5 or 7 mL) were placed in the descending thoracic aorta. Inflation and deflation were timed with traditional criteria from low-fidelity (fluid-filled) and high-fidelity (micromanometer) blood pressure signals during 1:1 support. Aortic, carotid, and coronary hemodynamics were measured with pressure and flow transducers. Myocardial oxygen consumption was calculated from coronary sinus and arterial blood samples. Left ventricular myocardial blood flow and end-organ blood flow were measured with microspheres.
Despite significant suprasystolic diastolic augmentation and afterload reduction at heart rates of 105 ± 3 beats per minute, left ventricular myocardial blood flow, myocardial oxygen consumption, the myocardial oxygen supply/demand relationship, cardiac output, and end-organ blood flow did not change. Statistically significant end-diastolic coronary, carotid, and aortic flow reversal occurred with IABP deflation. Inflation and deflation timed with a high-fidelity versus low-fidelity signal did not attenuate systemic flow reversal or improve the myocardial oxygen supply/demand relationship.
Systemic end-diastolic flow reversal limited counterpulsation efficacy in a pediatric model of acute left ventricular failure. Adjustment of IABP inflation and deflation timing with traditional criteria and a high-fidelity blood pressure waveform did not improve IABP efficacy or attenuate flow reversal. End-diastolic flow reversal may limit the efficacy of IABP counterpulsation therapy in pediatric patients with traditional timing criteria. Investigation of alternative deflation timing strategies is warranted.
主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)在儿科患者中的应用并未取得与成人相同的成功或临床应用。在儿科动物模型中,研究了 IABP 的疗效,以确定使用高保真血压信号与低保真信号进行 IABP 定时是否可以改善反搏治疗效果。
在伴有冠状动脉结扎导致的急性缺血性左心室衰竭的约克夏仔猪(n=19;体重 13.0±0.5kg)中,将小儿 IABP(5 或 7mL)置于降主动脉中。在 1:1 支持期间,使用传统的低保真(充满液体)和高保真(微压力计)血压信号的标准来定时充气和放气。使用压力和流量传感器测量主动脉、颈动脉和冠状动脉血液动力学。通过冠状动脉窦和动脉血液样本计算心肌耗氧量。使用微球测量左心室心肌血流和终末器官血流。
尽管在心率为 105±3 次/分钟时出现明显的超射舒张期增强和后负荷降低,但左心室心肌血流、心肌耗氧量、心肌氧供需关系、心输出量和终末器官血流均未改变。与 IABP 放气时,发生统计学上显著的舒张末期冠状动脉、颈动脉和主动脉血流反转。与低保真信号相比,使用高保真信号定时充气和放气并未减轻全身血流反转或改善心肌氧供需关系。
在急性左心室衰竭的儿科模型中,全身舒张末期血流反转限制了反搏效果。使用传统标准和高保真血压波形调整 IABP 充气和放气时间并未提高 IABP 疗效或减轻血流反转。舒张末期血流反转可能限制了儿科患者使用传统定时标准的 IABP 反搏治疗的疗效。需要进一步研究替代的放气定时策略。