Cardiovascular Innovation Institute, University of Louisville, KY 40202, USA.
Artif Organs. 2011 Sep;35(9):857-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2011.01292.x. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
The objective of this clinical study was to quantify the incidence and magnitude of intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) inflation and deflation landmark discrepancies associated with the IABP catheter arterial pressure waveform. Cardiac surgery patients with an IABP inserted prior to surgery were recruited. Following cardiac exposure, a high-fidelity pressure catheter was inserted into the aortic root for digital recording. The radial artery pressure signal was simultaneously recorded from the patient monitor along with the arterial pressure and electrocardiogram waveforms from the IABP console while operating at 1:1 and 1:2 synchronization. In selected patients, recordings were obtained with the IABP timed to the high-fidelity aortic root waveform. In all 11 patients, inflation and deflation landmark delays were observed when comparing the aortic root waveforms to the IABP arterial pressure waveforms (inflation delay = 74 ± 29 [23-117] ms; deflation delay = 71 ± 37 [24-141] ms, mean ± standard deviation [min-max]). Delays were greater when compared to the radial artery waveform (inflation delay = 175 ± 50 [100-233] ms; deflation delay = 168 ± 52 [100-274] ms). In all cases, the landmark delays were statistically different from zero (P < 0.001). Diastolic augmentation and afterload reduction varied with waveform source. Conflicting indications of afterload reduction occurred in four patients. Timing to the aortic root waveform resulted in greater diastolic pressure augmentation and afterload reduction but mixed changes in stroke volume. Delay and distortion of the arterial waveform was consistently found when measured through the IABP catheter lumen. These delays can alter IABP efficacy and may be eliminated by using high-fidelity sensing of aortic pressure.
本临床研究的目的是量化与主动脉内球囊泵(IABP)导管动脉压力波形相关的 IABP 充气和放气标志点差异的发生率和幅度。招募了在手术前插入 IABP 的心脏手术患者。在心脏暴露后,将高保真压力导管插入主动脉根部进行数字记录。同时从患者监护仪记录桡动脉压力信号,以及从 IABP 控制台记录动脉压力和心电图波形,同步比为 1:1 和 1:2。在选定的患者中,记录 IABP 与高保真主动脉根部波形同步的情况。在所有 11 名患者中,当将主动脉根部波形与 IABP 动脉压力波形进行比较时,观察到充气和放气标志点延迟(充气延迟=74±29[23-117]ms;放气延迟=71±37[24-141]ms,平均值±标准差[最小值-最大值])。与桡动脉波形相比,延迟更大(充气延迟=175±50[100-233]ms;放气延迟=168±52[100-274]ms)。在所有情况下,标志点延迟均与零有统计学差异(P<0.001)。舒张期增强和后负荷降低随波形源而变化。四个患者出现后负荷降低的矛盾指征。与主动脉根部波形同步会导致更大的舒张期压力增强和后负荷降低,但会导致每搏量发生混合变化。通过 IABP 导管管腔测量时,始终发现动脉波形存在延迟和失真。这些延迟会改变 IABP 的疗效,并且可以通过使用主动脉压力的高保真感测来消除。