Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (M.E.-P., J.E., E.M., M.M., N.G., P.J.-Q., R.H., R.M. B.I., I.J.N.-G., F.A., C.B., E.G., A.F.-O., C.M.); Centro Nacional de Investigaciónes Cardiovasculares Carlos III (CNIC), Madrid, Spain (M.E.-P., J.E., B.I., A.F.-O.); Imperial College Healthcare and NHS Trust, London, UK (R.P., S.S., J.D.); and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (C.F.).
Circulation. 2013 Dec 17;128(24):2557-66. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.001345. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
In chronic ischemic heart disease, focal stenosis, diffuse atherosclerotic narrowings, and microcirculatory dysfunction (MCD) contribute to limit myocardial flow. The prevalence of these ischemic heart disease levels in fractional flow reserve (FFR) interrogated vessels remains largely unknown.
Using intracoronary measurements, 91 coronaries (78 patients) with intermediate stenoses were classified in 4 FFR and coronary flow reserve (CFR) agreement groups, using FFR>0.80 and CFR<2 as cutoffs. Index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) and atherosclerotic burden (Gensini score) were also assessed. MCD was assumed when IMR≥29.1 (75(th) percentile). Fifty-four (59.3%) vessels had normal FFR, from which only 20 (37%) presented both normal CFR and IMR. Among vessels with FFR>0.80, most (63%) presented disturbed hemodynamics: abnormal CFR in 28 (52%) and MCD in 18 (33%). Vessels with FFR>0.80 presented higher IMR [adjusted mean 27.6 (95% confidence interval, 23.4-31.8)] than those with FFR≤0.80 [17.3 (95% confidence interval, 13.0-21.7), p=0.001]. Atherosclerotic burden was inversely correlated with CFR (r=-0.207, P=0.055), and in vessels with FFR>0.80 and CFR<2 (n=28, 39%), IMR had a wide dispersion (7-72.7 U), suggesting a combination of diffuse atherosclerotic narrowings and MCD. Vessels with FFR≤0.80 and normal CFR presented the lowest IMR, suggesting a preserved microcirculation.
A substantial number of coronary arteries with stenoses showing an FFR>0.80 present disturbed hemodynamics. Integration of FFR, CFR, and IMR supports the existence of differentiated patterns of ischemic heart disease that combine focal and diffuse coronary narrowings with variable degrees of MCD.
在慢性缺血性心脏病中,局灶性狭窄、弥漫性动脉粥样硬化狭窄和微循环功能障碍(MCD)导致心肌血流受限。在经过血流储备分数(FFR)检查的血管中,这些缺血性心脏病水平的患病率在很大程度上仍不清楚。
使用冠状动脉内测量,根据 FFR>0.80 和 CFR<2 的截断值,将 91 支(78 例患者)有中度狭窄的冠状动脉分为 4 个 FFR 和冠状动脉血流储备(CFR)相符组。还评估了微血管阻力指数(IMR)和动脉粥样硬化负担(Gensini 评分)。当 IMR≥29.1(75 百分位数)时,假设存在 MCD。54 支(59.3%)血管的 FFR 正常,其中只有 20 支(37%)同时具有正常的 CFR 和 IMR。在 FFR>0.80 的血管中,大多数(63%)存在血流动力学异常:28 支(52%)有异常 CFR 和 18 支(33%)有 MCD。FFR>0.80 的血管的 IMR 更高[校正均值 27.6(95%置信区间,23.4-31.8)],而 FFR≤0.80 的血管的 IMR 较低[17.3(95%置信区间,13.0-21.7),p=0.001]。动脉粥样硬化负担与 CFR 呈负相关(r=-0.207,P=0.055),在 FFR>0.80 且 CFR<2 的血管中(n=28,39%),IMR 的离散度较大(7-72.7 U),提示弥漫性动脉粥样硬化狭窄和 MCD 并存。FFR≤0.80 且 CFR 正常的血管的 IMR 最低,提示微循环保存完好。
大量显示 FFR>0.80 的狭窄冠状动脉存在血流动力学异常。FFR、CFR 和 IMR 的整合支持存在不同模式的缺血性心脏病,这些模式结合了局灶性和弥漫性冠状动脉狭窄以及不同程度的 MCD。