Liu Jieliang, Jin Junguo, Yu Bingyan, Zhang Shanghong, Lu Xiaoqi, Chen Guoqiang, Yang Yi, Dong Haojian
Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Int J Gen Med. 2024 Feb 27;17:693-704. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S444933. eCollection 2024.
Discordance between the anatomy and physiology of the coronary has important implications for managing patients with stable coronary disease, but its significance in ST-elevation myocardial infarction has not been fully elucidated.
The retrospective study involved patients diagnosed with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), along with quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and quantitative flow ratio (QFR) assessments. Patients were stratified into four groups regarding the severity of the culprit vessel, both visually and functionally: concordantly negative (QCA-diameter stenosis [DS] ≤ 50% and QFR > 0.80), mismatch (QCA-DS > 50% and QFR > 0.80), reverse mismatch (QCA-DS ≤ 50% and QFR ≤ 0.80), and concordantly positive (QCA-DS > 50% and QFR ≤ 0.80). Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the clinical factors linked to visual-functional mismatches. Kaplan‒Meier analysis was conducted to estimate the 18-month adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)-free survival between the four groups.
The study involved 310 patients, with 68 presenting visual-functional mismatch, and 51 exhibiting reverse mismatch. The mismatch was associated with higher angiography-derived microcirculatory resistance (AMR) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=1.016, 95% CI: 1.010-1.022, P<0.001). Reverse mismatch was associated with larger area stenosis (aOR=1.044, 95% CI: 1.004-1.086, P=0.032), lower coronary flow velocity (aOR=0.690, 95% CI: 0.567-0.970, P<0.001) and lower AMR (aOR=0.947, 95% CI: 0.924-0.970, P<0.001). Additionally, the mismatch group showed the worst 18-month MACE-free survival among the four groups (Log rank test p = 0.013).
AMR plays a significant role in the occurrence of visual-functional mismatches between QCA-DS and QFR, and the mismatch group showed the worst prognosis.
冠状动脉解剖与生理之间的不一致对稳定型冠心病患者的管理具有重要意义,但其在ST段抬高型心肌梗死中的意义尚未完全阐明。
这项回顾性研究纳入了诊断为ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)并接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者,同时进行了定量冠状动脉造影(QCA)和定量血流比(QFR)评估。根据罪犯血管的严重程度,从视觉和功能两方面将患者分为四组:一致阴性(QCA直径狭窄[DS]≤50%且QFR>0.80)、不匹配(QCA-DS>50%且QFR>0.80)、反向不匹配(QCA-DS≤50%且QFR≤0.80)和一致阳性(QCA-DS>50%且QFR≤0.80)。进行多变量逻辑回归分析以确定与视觉-功能不匹配相关的临床因素。进行Kaplan-Meier分析以估计四组之间18个月无主要不良心血管事件(MACE)生存情况。
该研究纳入了310例患者,其中68例存在视觉-功能不匹配,51例表现为反向不匹配。不匹配与更高的血管造影衍生微循环阻力(AMR)相关(调整优势比[aOR]=1.016,95%CI:1.010-1.022,P<0.001)。反向不匹配与更大的面积狭窄相关(aOR=1.044,95%CI:1.004-1.086,P=0.032)、更低的冠状动脉血流速度相关(aOR=0.690,95%CI:0.567-0.970,P<0.001)以及更低的AMR相关(aOR=0.947,95%CI:0.924-0.970,P<0.001)。此外,不匹配组在四组中18个月无MACE生存情况最差(对数秩检验p=0.013)。
AMR在QCA-DS和QFR之间视觉-功能不匹配的发生中起重要作用,且不匹配组预后最差。