Valencia Cesar A Restrepo, Villa Carlos A Buitrago, Cardona Jose A Chacon
Internal Medicine, Nephrology, Caldas University, Manizales, Colombia.
Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2013 Oct 14;6:215-21. doi: 10.2147/IJNRD.S46788. eCollection 2013.
WE COMPARED THE RESULTS OF FOUR DIFFERENT METHODS OF HEMODIALYSIS CATHETER INSERTION IN THE MEDIAL SEGMENT OF THE AXILLARY VEIN: ultrasound guidance, palpation, anatomical reference, and prior transient catheter.
All patients that required acute or chronic hemodialysis and for whom it was determined impossible or not recommended either to place a catheter in the internal jugular vein (for instance, those patients with a tracheostomy), or to practice arteriovenous fistula or graft; it was then essential to obtain an alternative vascular access. When the procedure of axillary vein catheter insertion was performed in the Renal Care Facility (RCF), ultrasound guidance was used, but in the intensive care unit (ICU), this resource was unavailable, so the palpation or anatomical reference technique was used.
Two nephrologists with experience in the technique performed 83 procedures during a period lasting 15 years and 8 months (from January 1997-August 2012): 41 by ultrasound guidance; 19 by anatomical references; 15 by palpation of the contiguous axillary artery; and 8 through a temporary axillary catheter previously placed. The ultrasound-guided patients had fewer punctures than other groups, but the value was not statistically significant. Arterial punctures were infrequent in all techniques. Analyzing all the procedure-related complications, such as hematoma, pneumothorax, brachial-plexus injury, as well as the reasons for catheter removal, no differences were observed among the groups. The functioning time was longer in the ultrasound-guided and previous catheter groups. In 15 years and 8 months of surveillance, no clinical or image evidence for axillary vein stenosis was found.
The ultrasound guide makes the procedure of inserting catheters in the axillary veins easier, but knowledge of the anatomy of the midaxillary region and the ability to feel the axillary artery pulse (for the palpation method) also allow relatively easy successful implant of catheters in the axillary veins.
我们比较了在腋静脉内侧段进行四种不同血液透析导管插入方法的结果:超声引导、触诊、解剖定位和预先置入临时导管。
所有需要急性或慢性血液透析且被确定无法或不建议在内颈静脉放置导管(例如,那些行气管切开术的患者),或无法进行动静脉内瘘或移植物手术的患者;此时必须获得替代血管通路。当在肾脏护理设施(RCF)进行腋静脉导管插入操作时,使用超声引导,但在重症监护病房(ICU),无法使用该资源,因此使用触诊或解剖定位技术。
两位具有该技术经验的肾病学家在15年零8个月(从1997年1月至2012年8月)期间进行了83例手术:41例采用超声引导;19例采用解剖定位;15例通过触诊相邻腋动脉;8例通过预先置入的临时腋静脉导管。超声引导组的穿刺次数少于其他组,但差异无统计学意义。所有技术中动脉穿刺均较少见。分析所有与手术相关的并发症,如血肿、气胸、臂丛神经损伤以及导管拔除原因,各组之间未观察到差异。超声引导组和预先置入导管组的导管使用时间更长。在15年零8个月的监测中,未发现腋静脉狭窄的临床或影像学证据。
超声引导使腋静脉导管插入操作更容易,但了解腋中区域的解剖结构以及感受腋动脉搏动的能力(触诊法)也能使腋静脉导管相对容易成功植入。