Suppr超能文献

使用基于恩曲他滨/替诺福韦酯富马酸盐的单片复方制剂从依非韦伦转换为利匹韦林48周后的疗效和安全性。

Efficacy and safety 48 weeks after switching from efavirenz to rilpivirine using emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-based single-tablet regimens.

作者信息

Mills Anthony M, Cohen Calvin, Dejesus Edwin, Brinson Cynthia, Williams Scott, Yale Kitty L, Ramanathan Srini, Wang Maggie H, White Kirsten, Chuck Susan K, Cheng Andrew K

机构信息

Anthony Mills MD Inc, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

HIV Clin Trials. 2013 Sep-Oct;14(5):216-23. doi: 10.1310/hct1405-216.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Due to ongoing neuropsychiatric adverse events in some efavirenz (EFV)-treated patients, a switch to an alternative non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor may be considered. Rilpivirine (RPV) has been coformulated as a single-tablet regimen (STR) with emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF), and the components have demonstrated noninferior efficacy to EFV+FTC/TDF, good tolerability profile, and high adherence. After discontinuation, EFV has an extended inductive effect on cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 that, after switching, may reduce RPV exposures and adversely impact clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This study examines the clinical implications of reduced RPV exposures with concomitant FTC/TDF and declining EFV exposures when patients, intolerant to EFV, switch from EFV/FTC/TDF to RPV/FTC/TDF.

METHODS

This 48-week, phase 2b, open-label, multicenter study evaluated the efficacy and safety of switching from EFV/FTC/TDF (≥3 months duration) to RPV/FTC/TDF. Virologic suppression (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL), safety, and EFV and RPV pharmacokinetics were assessed.

RESULTS

At weeks 12 and 24, all 49 dosed subjects remained suppressed on RPV/FTC/TDF. At week 48, 46 (93.9%) subjects remained suppressed and virologic failure occurred in 2/49 (4.1%) subjects with no emergence of resistance. EFV concentrations were above the 90th percentile for inhibitory concentration (IC90) for several weeks after EFV discontinuation, and RPV exposures were in the range observed in phase 3 studies by approximately 2 weeks post switch. No subjects discontinued the study due to an adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching from EFV/FTC/TDF to RPV/FTC/ TDF was a safe, efficacious option for virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients with EFV intolerance wishing to remain on an STR.

摘要

背景

由于部分接受依非韦伦(EFV)治疗的患者出现持续的神经精神不良事件,可考虑换用另一种非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂。利匹韦林(RPV)已与恩曲他滨/替诺福韦酯(FTC/TDF)联合制成单片复方制剂(STR),且这些成分已证明其疗效不劣于EFV+FTC/TDF,耐受性良好,依从性高。停药后,EFV对细胞色素P450(CYP)3A4具有延长的诱导作用,换药后可能会降低RPV的血药浓度并对临床结局产生不利影响。

目的

本研究探讨了对EFV不耐受的患者从EFV/FTC/TDF换用RPV/FTC/TDF时,FTC/TDF伴随使用导致RPV血药浓度降低以及EFV血药浓度下降的临床意义。

方法

这项为期48周的2b期开放标签多中心研究评估了从EFV/FTC/TDF(治疗时间≥3个月)换用RPV/FTC/TDF的疗效和安全性。评估了病毒学抑制情况(HIV-1 RNA<50拷贝/毫升)、安全性以及EFV和RPV的药代动力学。

结果

在第12周和第24周时,所有49例接受给药的受试者在接受RPV/FTC/TDF治疗后病毒仍被抑制。在第48周时,46例(93.9%)受试者病毒仍被抑制,2/49例(4.1%)受试者出现病毒学失败,且未出现耐药性。EFV停药后数周内,其浓度高于抑制浓度(IC90)的第90百分位数,换药后约2周时,RPV的血药浓度处于3期研究观察到的范围内。没有受试者因不良事件而停药。

结论

对于希望继续使用单片复方制剂且病毒学得到抑制但对EFV不耐受的HIV感染患者,从EFV/FTC/TDF换用RPV/FTC/TDF是一种安全、有效的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验