Mitra Biswadev, O'Reilly Gerard, Cameron Peter A, Zatta Amanda, Gruen Russell L
Emergency & Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; National Trauma Research Institute, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
ANZ J Surg. 2013 Dec;83(12):918-23. doi: 10.1111/ans.12417. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
The effectiveness of massive transfusion protocols (MTPs) has been assumed from low quality studies with multiple biases. This review aimed to (i) evaluate the association between the institution of an MTP and mortality and (ii) determine the effect of MTPs on transfusion practice post trauma.
A systematic review of studies that examined patient outcomes before and after the institution of an MTP in the same centre was conducted. The design and results of each study were described. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q test and the I(2) statistic. Odds ratios (ORs) for dichotomous outcomes from each study were pooled.
There were eight studies that satisfied inclusion criteria with marked heterogeneity in study populations (I(2) = 72.1%, P = 0.001). Two studies showed significantly improved mortality following implementation of an MTP, and six studies showed no significant change. Pooled OR for the effect of an MTP on short-term mortality was 0.73 (95% confidence interval: 0.48-1.11). The effect of MTPs on transfusion practice was varied.
Despite the popularity of MTPs and directives mandating their use in trauma centres, in before-after studies, MTPs have not always been associated with improved mortality. Evidence-based standardization of MTPs, improved compliance and analysis of broader endpoints were identified as areas for further research.
大量输血方案(MTPs)的有效性是从存在多种偏倚的低质量研究中推断出来的。本综述旨在(i)评估实施MTP与死亡率之间的关联,以及(ii)确定MTPs对创伤后输血实践的影响。
对在同一中心实施MTP前后检查患者结局的研究进行系统综述。描述了每项研究的设计和结果。使用Q检验和I²统计量评估异质性。汇总了每项研究二分结局的比值比(ORs)。
有八项研究符合纳入标准,研究人群存在明显异质性(I² = 72.1%,P = 0.001)。两项研究显示实施MTP后死亡率显著改善,六项研究显示无显著变化。MTP对短期死亡率影响的汇总OR为0.73(95%置信区间:0.48 - 1.11)。MTPs对输血实践的影响各不相同。
尽管MTPs很受欢迎且有指令要求在创伤中心使用,但在前后对照研究中,MTPs并不总是与死亡率改善相关。MTPs的循证标准化、提高依从性以及对更广泛终点的分析被确定为进一步研究的领域。