Villar M J
Acta Physiol Pharmacol Latinoam. 1985;35(1):135-43.
The sensitivity of diaminobenzidine (DAB), tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) and Hanker-Yates (H-Y) methods was compared in order to determine which procedure shows best the effective site of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) uptake. The lateral geniculate nucleus was chosen as the target nucleus for HRP injections, and the neuronal labelling in the superior colliculus and in zona incerta was used as a control. While TMB showed images that overestimated the effective site of uptake, the H-Y procedure showed more restricted HRP spots, similar to those obtained with DAB, that corresponded well with the neuronal labelling observed in the control areas. These results underline the usefulness of the H-Y procedure upon evaluation of the effective site of uptake. In addition, they do not support an underestimation of this effective site by this method.
为了确定哪种方法能最好地显示辣根过氧化物酶(HRP)摄取的有效部位,比较了二氨基联苯胺(DAB)法、四甲基联苯胺(TMB)法和汉克-耶茨(H-Y)法的敏感性。选择外侧膝状体作为HRP注射的靶核,并以上丘和未定带中的神经元标记作为对照。虽然TMB显示的图像高估了摄取的有效部位,但H-Y法显示的HRP斑点更局限,类似于用DAB获得的斑点,与对照区域观察到的神经元标记非常吻合。这些结果强调了H-Y法在评估摄取有效部位时的有用性。此外,这些结果并不支持该方法会低估这个有效部位。