Suppr超能文献

术前诊断为无浆膜侵犯的癌症患者的浆膜阳性胃癌(pT4a)的微创手术

Minimally invasive surgery for serosa-positive gastric cancer (pT4a) in patients with preoperative diagnosis of cancer without serosal invasion.

作者信息

Son T, Hyung W J, Lee J H, Kim Y M, Noh S H

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Eulji General Hospital, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2014 Mar;28(3):866-74. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3236-5. Epub 2013 Oct 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although surgeons normally use minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for patients with early gastric cancer, in Korea and Japan the procedure is also indicated for serosa-negative tumors. Serosal invasion is regarded to be a potential risk factor for peritoneal dissemination as a result of the effect of pneumoperitoneum and tumor manipulation during the operation. We compared operative outcomes between MIS and conventional open surgery for serosa-involved advanced gastric cancer patients who had a preoperative diagnosis of cancer without serosal invasion.

METHODS

A total of 61 patients (39 patients treated by MIS and 22 by open surgery) treated between 2003 and 2009 who were first diagnosed preoperatively as serosa negative on the basis of computed tomography, endoscopy, and endoscopic ultrasound but then diagnosed as serosa positive upon final pathology were studied. We retrospectively compared recurrence and survival between the two treatment groups.

RESULTS

Clinicopathologic characteristics, clinical stage, extent of surgery, and short-term operative outcome did not differ between the groups. 5-year overall survival (73.5 vs. 67.5 %, p = 0.518, respectively) and disease-free survival (67.8 vs. 54.2 %, p = 0.296, respectively) were comparable between the MIS and open surgery groups. There were recurrences in 12 patients in the MIS group and 11 patients in the open surgery group, with a median follow-up period of 64 months. Recurrence patterns did not differ between the groups; moreover, MIS did not increase peritoneal recurrences compared to open surgery (42.0 vs. 54.5 %, p = 0.537, respectively). In multivariate analyses, the type of surgery was not an independent prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar survival and recurrence patterns were observed in advanced gastric cancer patients preoperatively diagnosed as serosa negative who were treated either by MIS or open surgery. MIS may be safely applied in patients with serosa-positive tumors.

摘要

背景

虽然外科医生通常对早期胃癌患者采用微创手术(MIS),但在韩国和日本,该手术也适用于浆膜阴性肿瘤。由于手术期间气腹和肿瘤操作的影响,浆膜侵犯被认为是腹膜播散的潜在危险因素。我们比较了术前诊断为无浆膜侵犯的癌症但术中发现浆膜受累的进展期胃癌患者接受MIS与传统开放手术的手术效果。

方法

研究了2003年至2009年间共61例患者(39例接受MIS治疗,22例接受开放手术治疗),这些患者术前基于计算机断层扫描、内镜检查和内镜超声诊断为浆膜阴性,但最终病理诊断为浆膜阳性。我们回顾性比较了两个治疗组之间的复发情况和生存率。

结果

两组之间的临床病理特征、临床分期、手术范围和短期手术效果无差异。MIS组和开放手术组的5年总生存率(分别为73.5%和67.5%,p = 0.518)和无病生存率(分别为67.8%和54.2%,p = 0.296)相当。MIS组有12例患者复发,开放手术组有11例患者复发,中位随访期为64个月。两组之间的复发模式无差异;此外,与开放手术相比,MIS并未增加腹膜复发率(分别为42.0%和54.5%,p = 0.537)。在多变量分析中,手术类型不是独立的预后因素。

结论

术前诊断为浆膜阴性的进展期胃癌患者,接受MIS或开放手术治疗,其生存率和复发模式相似。MIS可安全应用于浆膜阳性肿瘤患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验