• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开腹胃切除术治疗浆膜阳性(pT4a)胃癌的手术及长期肿瘤学结局:一项倾向评分匹配分析

Surgical and long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for serosa-positive (pT4a) gastric cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis.

作者信息

Li Zhengyan, Liu Yezhou, Hao Yiming, Bai Bin, Yu Deliang, Zhao Qingchuan

机构信息

Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China.

Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China.

出版信息

Surg Oncol. 2019 Mar;28:167-173. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.suronc.2019.01.003
PMID:30851895
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To date, it has been unclear whether laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) is suitable for patients with serosa-positive (pT4a) gastric cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical and long-term oncologic outcomes of LG and open gastrectomy for pT4a gastric cancer.

METHODS

We prospectively collected data from 987 patients with pathological confirmed pT4a gastric cancer who underwent LG or OG at our institution between June 2009 and May 2015. A 1:1 matched propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to reduce confounding bias. The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

After PSM, a well-balanced cohort of 202 pairs patients was analyzed. The LG group showed a longer operation time (261.42 vs. 171.00 min, P = 0.001), less blood loss (185.47 vs. 217.84 ml, P = 0.000), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (7.56 vs. 8.22 days, P = 0.007). The overall complication rate was 14.4% in the LG group and 16.3% in the OG group (P = 0.581). The minor (grade II) and severe (grade ≥ IIIa) complication rates were similar (LG, 6.9% vs. OG, 9.9%, P = 0.282; LG, 7.4% vs. OG, 6.4%, P = 0.695, respectively). The LG and OG groups showed similar survival 5-year OS and 5-year Disease-free survival (DFS) rates (44.6% vs. 42.1%, P = 0.403; 40.1 vs. 37.6%, P = 0.321, respectively). The recurrence rate and pattern did not differ between the two groups during the follow-up stage (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with pT4a gastric cancer, LG with D2 lymph node dissection can be a safe and feasible procedure in terms of surgical and long-term oncologic outcomes.

摘要

背景

迄今为止,腹腔镜胃切除术(LG)是否适用于浆膜阳性(pT4a)胃癌患者尚不清楚。本研究的目的是比较LG和开腹胃切除术治疗pT4a胃癌的手术及长期肿瘤学结局。

方法

我们前瞻性收集了2009年6月至2015年5月期间在本机构接受LG或开腹胃切除术(OG)的987例病理确诊为pT4a胃癌患者的数据。进行1:1匹配的倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析以减少混杂偏倚。主要结局为5年总生存率(OS)。

结果

PSM后,分析了一组均衡的202对患者。LG组手术时间更长(261.42对171.00分钟,P = 0.001),失血量更少(185.47对217.84毫升,P = 0.000),术后住院时间更短(7.56对8.22天,P = 0.007)。LG组总体并发症发生率为14.4%,OG组为16.3%(P = 0.581)。轻度(II级)和重度(≥IIIa级)并发症发生率相似(LG组6.9%对OG组9.9%,P = 0.282;LG组7.4%对OG组6.4%,P = 0.695)。LG组和OG组5年OS率和5年无病生存率(DFS)相似(分别为44.6%对42.1%,P = 0.403;40.1对37.6%,P = 0.321)。随访期间两组复发率及复发模式无差异(P>0.05)。

结论

对于pT4a胃癌患者,行D2淋巴结清扫的LG在手术及长期肿瘤学结局方面是一种安全可行的手术方式。

相似文献

1
Surgical and long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for serosa-positive (pT4a) gastric cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis.腹腔镜与开腹胃切除术治疗浆膜阳性(pT4a)胃癌的手术及长期肿瘤学结局:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Surg Oncol. 2019 Mar;28:167-173. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
2
Comparisons of perioperative and survival outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for serosa-positive (pT4a) gastric cancer patients: a propensity score matched analysis.腹腔镜与开腹胃癌根治术治疗浆膜阳性(pT4a)胃癌患者的围手术期和生存结局比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 May;406(3):641-650. doi: 10.1007/s00423-021-02114-y. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
3
Long- and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy in patients with clinically and pathological locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity-score matching analysis.腹腔镜与开腹胃癌根治术治疗临床及病理局部进展期胃癌的长期和短期疗效比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb;32(2):735-742. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5730-7. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
4
Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer.腹腔镜与开放D2胃切除术治疗进展期胃癌的长期疗效
Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep;27(3):441-448. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.05.022. Epub 2018 May 26.
5
Surgical and survival outcomes after laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for serosa-invasive Siewert type II/III esophagogastric junction carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis.腹腔镜与开腹胃切除术治疗浆膜浸润型 Siewert Ⅱ/Ⅲ型食管胃结合部腺癌的手术和生存结局:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jul;36(7):5055-5066. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08867-3. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
6
Comparison of Surgical and Oncological Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Open Gastrectomy for Pathologically Serosa-Invasive (pT4a) Advanced Gastric Cancer-Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.腹腔镜与开腹胃切除术治疗病理性浆膜浸润(pT4a)进展期胃癌的手术和肿瘤学结局比较:回顾性倾向评分匹配分析。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2023 Aug;33(8):756-762. doi: 10.1089/lap.2023.0074. Epub 2023 May 2.
7
Severity of complications and long-term survival after laparoscopic total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer: A propensity score-matched, case-control study.腹腔镜全胃切除术联合 D2 淋巴结清扫术治疗进展期胃癌的并发症严重程度和长期生存:倾向评分匹配的病例对照研究。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jun;54(Pt A):62-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.034. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
8
Comparison of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer.腹腔镜与开腹胃癌根治术的比较。
Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec;35:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.06.008. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
9
Open vs robot-assisted laparoscopic gastric resection with D2 lymph node dissection for adenocarcinoma: a case-control study.开腹与机器人辅助腹腔镜胃切除术联合 D2 淋巴结清扫术治疗腺癌的病例对照研究。
Int J Med Robot. 2011 Dec;7(4):452-8. doi: 10.1002/rcs.416. Epub 2011 Oct 7.
10
Totally Laparoscopic versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Matched Pair Analysis.全腹腔镜与开放胃癌切除术:配对分析
Zentralbl Chir. 2018 Apr;143(2):145-154. doi: 10.1055/a-0586-9275. Epub 2018 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Oncological long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for cT3-4 gastric cancer at surgical staging: a propensity-score matched cohort study.腹腔镜与开腹胃切除术治疗外科分期 cT3-4 期胃癌的肿瘤学长期结局:倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6682-6690. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11287-8. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
2
Laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy for T4a gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of long-term outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹全胃切除术治疗 T4a 期胃癌:长期疗效的倾向评分匹配分析。
Updates Surg. 2024 Sep;76(5):1843-1854. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01910-7. Epub 2024 Jun 16.
3
Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for nonmetastatic T4a gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of reconstructed individual participant data from propensity score-matched studies.
腹腔镜与开腹胃癌根治术治疗非转移性 T4a 期胃癌:倾向评分匹配研究中重建个体参与者数据的荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 May 29;22(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03422-5.
4
Minimally invasive surgery for gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: Current evidence and future perspectives.胃食管交界腺癌的微创手术:当前证据与未来展望。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023 Oct 15;15(10):1675-1690. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i10.1675.
5
ASO Author Reflections: Similar Long-Term Outcomes Between Laparoscopic Versus Open Distal Gastrectomy for T4a Gastric Cancer.ASO作者反思:腹腔镜与开放远端胃癌根治术治疗T4a期胃癌的长期结局相似
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Apr;30(4):2290-2291. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12950-x. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
6
Long-Term Outcomes of Open Versus Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for T4a Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.T4a期胃癌开放与腹腔镜远端胃切除术的长期结局:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Apr;30(4):2278-2289. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12897-z. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
7
Laparoscopic vs. Open Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Case-Control Study.腹腔镜与开腹胃癌根治术治疗局部进展期胃癌的疗效比较:一项倾向评分匹配的回顾性病例对照研究。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Mar 9;29(3):1840-1865. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29030151.
8
Long-Term Survival after Minimally Invasive Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Patients in the United States and China.中国和美国患者的倾向评分匹配分析:微创与开放胃切除术治疗胃腺癌的长期生存比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Mar;27(3):802-811. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-08170-5. Epub 2020 Jan 1.