• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

安氏Ⅰ类和安氏Ⅱ类1分类错牙合畸形中颅底形态的变化

Changes in Cranial Base Morphology in Class I and Class II Division 1 Malocclusions.

作者信息

Agarwal Anirudh, Pandey Harsh, Bajaj Kamal, Pandey Lavesh

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Rajasthan Dental College & Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

出版信息

J Int Oral Health. 2013 Feb;5(1):39-42. Epub 2013 Feb 26.

PMID:24155576
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3768075/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The cranial base plays a key role in craniofacial growth; it helps to integrate spatially and functionally different patterns of growth in various adjoining regions of the skull such as components of the brain, the nasal and oral cavity and the pharynx. The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference in cranial base flexure between skeletal and dental Class I and Class II division 1.

MATERIALS & METHODS: Lateral cephalometric radiograph, of Class I and Class II with an average growth pattern were analyzed and compared. A total of 103 patients having class I (n=52) and class II (n=51) malocclusion, were taken from Department of Orthodontics, Rajasthan Dental College & Hospital, Jaipur. Cranial base angle (N-S-Ar) and ANB were measured on pre treatment lateral cephalograms.

RESULTS

In this study cranial base angle did not show statistically significant difference between the two groups studied.

CONCLUSION

In the assessment of orthodontic problems involving anteroposterior malrelationships of the jaws, the problem is usually the result of size, form and position of the jaw. The present study failed to find any differences in cranial base angle between sagittal malocclusions. How to cite this article: Agarwal A, Pandey H, Bajaj K, Pandey L. Changes in Cranial Base Morphology in Class I and Class II Division 1 Malocclusion. J Int Oral Health 2013; 5(1):39-42.

摘要

引言

颅底在颅面生长中起关键作用;它有助于在空间和功能上整合颅骨各个相邻区域不同的生长模式,如脑、鼻腔、口腔和咽部的组成部分。本研究的目的是评估骨骼类和牙性I类与II类1分类错牙合之间颅底弯曲度的差异。

材料与方法

对具有平均生长模式的I类和II类错牙合的头颅侧位X线片进行分析和比较。总共103例I类(n = 52)和II类(n = 51)错牙合患者来自斋浦尔拉贾斯坦牙科学院及医院正畸科。在治疗前的头颅侧位片上测量颅底角(N-S-Ar)和ANB。

结果

在本研究中,所研究的两组之间颅底角没有显示出统计学上的显著差异。

结论

在评估涉及颌骨前后关系不调的正畸问题时,问题通常是颌骨的大小、形态和位置所致。本研究未能发现矢状向错牙合之间颅底角有任何差异。如何引用本文:Agarwal A, Pandey H, Bajaj K, Pandey L. 1类和2类1分类错牙合中颅底形态的变化。《国际口腔健康杂志》2013;5(1):39 - 42。

相似文献

1
Changes in Cranial Base Morphology in Class I and Class II Division 1 Malocclusions.安氏Ⅰ类和安氏Ⅱ类1分类错牙合畸形中颅底形态的变化
J Int Oral Health. 2013 Feb;5(1):39-42. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
2
Changes in cranial base morphology in different malocclusions.不同错牙合畸形中颅底形态的变化。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2007 Nov;10(4):216-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2007.00403.x.
3
Role of cranial base flexure in developing sagittal jaw discrepancies.颅底弯曲在矢状颌骨差异发展中的作用。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 Oct;122(4):386-91. doi: 10.1067/mod.2002.126155.
4
Correlation of the cranial base angle and its components with other dental/skeletal variables and treatment time.颅底角及其组成部分与其他牙齿/骨骼变量及治疗时间的相关性。
Angle Orthod. 2004 Jun;74(3):361-6. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0361:COTCBA>2.0.CO;2.
5
Relationship between cephalometric cranial base and anterior-posterior features in an Iranian population.伊朗人群中头影测量颅底与前后部特征之间的关系。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2020 Jan 21;17(1):60-65. eCollection 2020 Jan-Feb.
6
Cranial base characteristics in anteroposterior malocclusions: A meta-analysis.安氏错牙合前后向颅底特征的Meta分析
Angle Orthod. 2016 Jul;86(4):668-80. doi: 10.2319/032315-186.1. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
7
[Cephlometric analysis of the cranial base in class II(1) malocclusions with different vertical types in adolescences].青少年不同垂直型安氏II类1分类错牙合患者颅底的头影测量分析
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2004 Dec;13(6):484-6.
8
FSA Angle: A Soft Tissue Approach for Assessing Sagittal Skeletal Discrepancy.FSA角:一种评估矢状面骨骼差异的软组织方法。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(Suppl 1):S54-S56. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2017.
9
Cranial-base morphology in adults with skeletal Class III malocclusion.成人骨性III类错牙合患者的颅底形态
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Jul;146(1):82-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.04.014.
10
Craniofacial morphology in patients with Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion.安氏II类2分类错牙合畸形患者的颅面形态
Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2014;55(3):909-13.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship between vertical facial patterns and palatal morphology in class I and class II malocclusion - An in vitro study.安氏Ⅰ类和Ⅱ类错牙合垂直面部形态与腭部形态的关系——一项体外研究
Bioinformation. 2025 May 31;21(5):1734-1738. doi: 10.6026/973206300211734. eCollection 2025.
2
Cranial Base Changes After Trans-sutural Distraction Osteogenesis in Growing Patients With Cleft Lip/Palate and Midface Hypoplasia.唇腭裂及面中部发育不全患儿经缝牵引成骨术后的颅底变化
J Craniofac Surg. 2024 Nov 25;36(3):916-21. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000010889.
3
Influence of anthropometry, TMD, and sex on molar bite force in adolescents with and without orthodontic needs.人体测量学、颞下颌关节紊乱病及性别对有或无正畸需求青少年磨牙咬合力的影响。
J Orofac Orthop. 2017 Nov;78(6):487-493. doi: 10.1007/s00056-017-0105-1. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
4
Geometric morphometrics of different malocclusions in lateral skull radiographs.头颅侧位X线片中不同错牙合畸形的几何形态测量学
J Orofac Orthop. 2017 Jan;78(1):11-20. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0057-x. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
5
Cranial base characteristics in anteroposterior malocclusions: A meta-analysis.安氏错牙合前后向颅底特征的Meta分析
Angle Orthod. 2016 Jul;86(4):668-80. doi: 10.2319/032315-186.1. Epub 2015 Nov 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Dental and facial skeletal characteristics and growth of females and males with Class II Division 1 malocclusion between the ages of 10 and 14 (revisited). Part II. Anteroposterior and vertical circumpubertal growth.10至14岁安氏II类1分类错牙合畸形男女的牙颌面骨骼特征及生长发育(再探讨)。第二部分。青春期前后及垂直方向的生长发育
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Nov;120(5):542-55. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.118628.
2
A comparison of cranial base growth in Class I and Class II skeletal patterns.I类和II类骨骼型颅底生长的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Apr;119(4):401-5. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.112872.
3
Relationship between cranial base and maxillofacial morphology.颅底与颌面形态之间的关系。
Eur J Orthod. 1995 Oct;17(5):403-10. doi: 10.1093/ejo/17.5.403.
4
Saddle angle and maxillary prognathism: a radiological analysis of the association between the NSAr and SNA angles.
Br J Orthod. 1984 Oct;11(4):209-13. doi: 10.1179/bjo.11.4.209.
5
Lower cranial height vs craniofacial dimensions in Angle Class II malocclusion.安氏II类错牙合中下颌骨高度与颅面尺寸的关系
Angle Orthod. 1983 Jul;53(3):253-60. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1983)053<0253:LCHVCD>2.0.CO;2.
6
Craniofacial characteristics of subjects with normal and postnormal occlusions--a longitudinal study.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987 Sep;92(3):207-12. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(87)90413-6.
7
[Specifications and major discriminants in a Class II division 1 population].
Rev Orthop Dento Faciale. 1986;20(2):197-208.
8
The saddle angle: constancy or change?
Angle Orthod. 1977 Jan;47(1):46-54. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1977)047<0046:TSACOC>2.0.CO;2.