Freudenthaler Josef, Čelar Aleš, Ritt Christopher, Mitteröcker Philipp
Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
School of Dentistry, Orthodontics, Sensengasse 2a, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
J Orofac Orthop. 2017 Jan;78(1):11-20. doi: 10.1007/s00056-016-0057-x. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
To evaluate the role of craniofacial shape in malocclusion by application of geometric morphometrics to a set of two-dimensional landmarks and semilandmarks obtained from lateral skull radiographs.
Cephalometric radiograph tracings of 88 untreated Caucasians (age range 7-39 years) were assigned to four groups according to their occlusion: neutrocclusion, distocclusion, mesiocclusion, and anterior open bite. The geometric morphometric shape analysis incorporated 66 landmarks and semilandmarks, which underwent generalized Procrustes analysis, between-groups principal component analysis, thin-plate spline deformation grid visualization, permutation tests, and receiver operating characteristic curves.
The position and shape of the mandible contributed to differences between the distocclusion and mesiocclusion groups, whereas the maxillary shape showed less variation. The growth-related shape alteration during adolescence was most pronounced in the mesiocclusion group and least pronounced in the neutrocclusion group. The open bite group was associated with an altered orientation of the mandibular body and the maxilla, showed the most hyperdivergent maxillomandibular pattern but was not an own skeletal entity. Despite clear differences in mean shape across the four groups, the individual distribution of craniofacial shape overlapped between the groups without discrete clusters.
Craniofacial shape was clearly associated with dental malocclusion and showed considerable variation. Geometric morphometrics was a powerful research tool but for diagnosing individual malocclusion standard cephalometric measurements including overjet and overbite were equally or more efficient than geometric morphometric descriptors.
通过将几何形态测量学应用于从头颅侧位X线片获得的一组二维标志点和半标志点,评估颅面形态在错牙合畸形中的作用。
根据咬合情况,将88名未经治疗的白种人(年龄范围7 - 39岁)的头颅侧位X线片描图分为四组:中性咬合、远中咬合、近中咬合和前牙开牙合。几何形态测量学形状分析纳入了66个标志点和半标志点,进行了广义Procrustes分析、组间主成分分析、薄板样条变形网格可视化、置换检验和受试者工作特征曲线分析。
下颌骨的位置和形态导致了远中咬合组和近中咬合组之间的差异,而上颌骨形态的变化较小。青春期与生长相关的形态改变在近中咬合组最为明显,在中性咬合组最不明显。开牙合组与下颌体和上颌骨的方向改变有关,表现出最明显的上颌下颌高度发散模式,但不是一个独立的骨骼实体。尽管四组之间平均形态存在明显差异,但颅面形态的个体分布在各组之间重叠,没有离散的聚类。
颅面形态与牙列错牙合畸形明显相关,且表现出相当大的变异性。几何形态测量学是一种强大的研究工具,但对于诊断个体错牙合畸形,包括覆盖和覆牙合在内的标准头颅侧位测量比几何形态测量描述符同样有效或更有效。