Fonoteca Zoológica, Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 14;8(10):e77312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077312. eCollection 2013.
Invasive species are a leading cause of the current biodiversity decline, and hence examining the major traits favouring invasion is a key and long-standing goal of invasion biology. Despite the prominent role of the advertisement calls in sexual selection and reproduction, very little attention has been paid to the features of acoustic communication of invasive species in nonindigenous habitats and their potential impacts on native species. Here we compare for the first time the transmission efficiency of the advertisement calls of native and invasive species, searching for competitive advantages for acoustic communication and reproduction of introduced taxa, and providing insights into competing hypotheses in evolutionary divergence of acoustic signals: acoustic adaptation vs. morphological constraints. Using sound propagation experiments, we measured the attenuation rates of pure tones (0.2-5 kHz) and playback calls (Lithobates catesbeianus and Pelophylax perezi) across four distances (1, 2, 4, and 8 m) and over two substrates (water and soil) in seven Iberian localities. All factors considered (signal type, distance, substrate, and locality) affected transmission efficiency of acoustic signals, which was maximized with lower frequency sounds, shorter distances, and over water surface. Despite being broadcast in nonindigenous habitats, the advertisement calls of invasive L. catesbeianus were propagated more efficiently than those of the native species, in both aquatic and terrestrial substrates, and in most of the study sites. This implies absence of optimal relationship between native environments and propagation of acoustic signals in anurans, in contrast to what predicted by the acoustic adaptation hypothesis, and it might render these vertebrates particularly vulnerable to intrusion of invasive species producing low frequency signals, such as L. catesbeianus. Our findings suggest that mechanisms optimizing sound transmission in native habitat can play a less significant role than other selective forces or biological constraints in evolutionary design of anuran acoustic signals.
入侵物种是当前生物多样性减少的主要原因之一,因此研究有利于入侵的主要特征是入侵生物学的一个关键和长期目标。尽管广告叫声在性选择和繁殖中起着重要作用,但很少有人关注非本地生境中入侵物种的声学通讯特征及其对本地物种的潜在影响。在这里,我们首次比较了本地和入侵物种的广告叫声的传输效率,寻找引入类群在声学通讯和繁殖方面的竞争优势,并深入了解了在声学信号进化分歧中相互竞争的假说:声学适应与形态限制。通过声音传播实验,我们在七个伊比利亚地区的四个距离(1、2、4 和 8 m)和两个基质(水和土壤)上测量了纯音(0.2-5 kHz)和播放叫声(Lithobates catesbeianus 和 Pelophylax perezi)的衰减率。所有考虑的因素(信号类型、距离、基质和地点)都影响了声学信号的传输效率,低频声音、较短的距离和水面上的信号传输效率最高。尽管在非本地生境中播放,但入侵物种 L. catesbeianus 的广告叫声在水和陆地基质中,以及在大多数研究地点的传播效率都高于本地物种。这意味着在两栖动物中,原生环境与声学信号传播之间不存在最佳关系,这与声学适应假说所预测的相反,这可能使这些脊椎动物特别容易受到产生低频信号的入侵物种的入侵,例如 L. catesbeianus。我们的研究结果表明,在原生栖息地中优化声音传输的机制在设计两栖动物的声学信号时可能不如其他选择压力或生物限制重要。