• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消费者负担能力对辅助生殖技术和胚胎移植实践的可及性的影响:国际分析。

The impact of consumer affordability on access to assisted reproductive technologies and embryo transfer practices: an international analysis.

机构信息

National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

National Perinatal Epidemiology and Statistics Unit, School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2014 Jan;101(1):191-198.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.005. Epub 2013 Oct 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.005
PMID:24156958
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematically quantify the impact of consumer cost on assisted reproduction technology (ART) utilization and numbers of embryos transferred.

DESIGN

Ordinary least squared (OLS) regression models were constructed to measure the independent impact of ART affordability-measured as consumer cost relative to average disposable income-on ART utilization and embryo transfer practices.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENT(S): Women undergoing ART treatment.

INTERVENTION(S): None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): OLS regression coefficient for ART affordability, which estimates the independent effect of consumer cost relative to income on utilization and number of embryos transferred.

RESULT(S): ART affordability was independently and positively associated with ART utilization with a mean OLS coefficient of 0.032. This indicates that, on average, a decrease in the cost of a cycle of 1 percentage point of disposable income predicts a 3.2% increase in utilization. ART affordability was independently and negatively associated with the number of embryos transferred, indicating that a decrease in the cost of a cycle of 10 percentage points of disposable income predicts a 5.1% increase in single-embryo transfer cycles.

CONCLUSION(S): The relative cost that consumers pay for ART treatment predicts the level of access and number of embryos transferred. Policies that affect ART funding should be informed by these findings to ensure equitable access to treatment and clinically responsible embryo transfer practices.

摘要

目的

系统评估消费者成本对辅助生殖技术(ART)应用和胚胎移植数量的影响。

设计

构建普通最小二乘法(OLS)回归模型,以衡量 ART 可负担性(以消费者成本相对于平均可支配收入来衡量)对 ART 应用和胚胎移植实践的独立影响。

地点

不适用。

患者

接受 ART 治疗的女性。

干预措施

无。

主要观察指标

ART 可负担性的 OLS 回归系数,该系数估计了消费者成本相对于收入对应用和胚胎移植数量的独立影响。

结果

ART 可负担性与 ART 应用呈独立正相关,平均 OLS 系数为 0.032。这表明,平均而言,可支配收入中每降低 1 个百分点的周期成本预计会使应用率增加 3.2%。ART 可负担性与胚胎移植数量呈独立负相关,表明可支配收入中每降低 10 个百分点的周期成本预计会使单胚胎移植周期增加 5.1%。

结论

消费者为 ART 治疗支付的相对成本预测了治疗的可及性和胚胎移植数量。影响 ART 资金的政策应考虑到这些发现,以确保公平获得治疗和符合临床责任的胚胎移植实践。

相似文献

1
The impact of consumer affordability on access to assisted reproductive technologies and embryo transfer practices: an international analysis.消费者负担能力对辅助生殖技术和胚胎移植实践的可及性的影响:国际分析。
Fertil Steril. 2014 Jan;101(1):191-198.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.005. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
2
Socioeconomic disparities in access to ART treatment and the differential impact of a policy that increased consumer costs.社会经济差异对接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的影响,以及一项增加消费者成本的政策的不同影响。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Nov;28(11):3111-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det302. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
3
Assisted reproductive technology use, embryo transfer practices, and birth outcomes after infertility insurance mandates: New Jersey and Connecticut.不孕症保险授权后的辅助生殖技术使用、胚胎移植实践及出生结局:新泽西州和康涅狄格州
Fertil Steril. 2016 Feb;105(2):347-55. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.009. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
4
International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART) world report: assisted reproductive technology 2004.国际辅助生殖技术监测委员会(ICMART)世界报告:辅助生殖技术 2004 年报告。
Hum Reprod. 2013 May;28(5):1375-90. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det036. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
5
Insurance mandates and trends in infertility treatments.保险授权与不孕症治疗趋势。
Fertil Steril. 2008 Jan;89(1):66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.167. Epub 2007 May 7.
6
The relative contribution of assisted reproductive technologies and ovulation induction to multiple births in the United States 5 years after the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommendation to limit the number of embryos transferred.美国辅助生殖技术协会/美国生殖医学学会建议限制移植胚胎数量五年后,辅助生殖技术和促排卵对美国多胎妊娠的相对贡献。
Fertil Steril. 2007 Dec;88(6):1554-61. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.112. Epub 2007 May 4.
7
International committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technologies: world report on assisted reproductive technologies, 2007.国际辅助生殖技术监测委员会:《2007年辅助生殖技术世界报告》
Fertil Steril. 2015 Feb;103(2):402-13.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Dec 13.
8
Trends and factors associated with the Day 5 embryo transfer, assisted reproductive technology surveillance, USA, 2001-2009.2001-2009 年美国与第 5 天胚胎移植、辅助生殖技术监测相关的趋势和因素。
Hum Reprod. 2012 Aug;27(8):2325-31. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des168. Epub 2012 May 24.
9
The history of Belgian assisted reproduction technology cycle registration and control: a case study in reducing the incidence of multiple pregnancy.比利时辅助生殖技术周期登记和控制的历史:降低多胎妊娠发生率的案例研究。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Oct;28(10):2709-19. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det269. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
10
Assisted reproductive technology practice patterns and the impact of embryo transfer guidelines in the United States.美国辅助生殖技术的实践模式及胚胎移植指南的影响。
Fertil Steril. 2007 Aug;88(2):275-82. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.09.016. Epub 2007 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Policy solutions to improve access to fertility treatment and optimise patient care: consensus from an expert forum.改善生育治疗可及性并优化患者护理的政策解决方案:专家论坛共识
Front Reprod Health. 2025 Aug 29;7:1605480. doi: 10.3389/frph.2025.1605480. eCollection 2025.
2
Commercial Impacts on Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Scoping Review.商业对辅助生殖技术的影响:一项范围综述
J Bioeth Inq. 2025 Sep 11. doi: 10.1007/s11673-025-10456-1.
3
Autonomous cryoprotectant loading of the oocyte using microfluidic transistors.使用微流体晶体管对卵母细胞进行自主冷冻保护剂加载
Device. 2025 Jun 20;3(6). doi: 10.1016/j.device.2025.100715. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
4
Delayed transitions to adulthood and assisted reproduction: A study of educational differences in Spain.成年期的延迟过渡与辅助生殖:西班牙教育差异研究
Adv Life Course Res. 2025 Jun;64:100672. doi: 10.1016/j.alcr.2025.100672. Epub 2025 Apr 26.
5
A retrospective study "myo-inositol is a cost-saving strategy for controlled ovarian stimulation in non-polycystic ovary syndrome art patients.".一项回顾性研究“肌醇是一种用于非多囊卵巢综合征患者控制性卵巢刺激的节约成本策略”。
Health Econ Rev. 2025 Mar 15;15(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13561-025-00609-8.
6
Financial cost of assisted reproductive technology for patients in high-income countries: A systematic review protocol.高收入国家患者辅助生殖技术的财务成本:一项系统评价方案
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 13;20(2):e0318780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318780. eCollection 2025.
7
Alignment, Anticipation, Adaptation, or Lagging Behind? Age-Based Regulations in Assisted Reproduction and Late Fertility.对齐、预期、适应还是落后?辅助生殖与晚育中基于年龄的规定
Popul Dev Rev. 2024 Dec;50(4):1319-1351. doi: 10.1111/padr.12658. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
8
Exploring the experiences of English-speaking women who have moved to Israel and subsequently used Israeli fertility treatment services: A qualitative study.探讨移居以色列并随后使用以色列生育治疗服务的讲英语的女性的体验:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 28;19(8):e0309265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309265. eCollection 2024.
9
The relationship between socioeconomic status and perinatal outcomes in in vitro fertilization conceptions.体外受精受孕中社会经济地位与围产期结局的关系。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 Feb 23;4(2):100329. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100329. eCollection 2024 May.
10
Declining global fertility rates and the implications for family planning and family building: an IFFS consensus document based on a narrative review of the literature.全球生育率下降及其对计划生育和家庭建设的影响:基于文献综述的 IFFS 共识文件。
Hum Reprod Update. 2024 Mar 1;30(2):153-173. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmad028.