Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Kwei Shan Township, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Jan;32(1):18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.09.011. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
A pelvic x-ray (PXR) can be used as an effective screening tool to evaluate pelvic fractures and stability. However, associated intra-abdominal/retroperitoneal organ injuries and hemorrhage should also be considered and evaluated in patients with major torso injuries. An abdominal/pelvic computed tomographic (CT) scan may provide higher resolution and more information than a PXR. The role of conventional PXRs was delineated in the current study in the context of the development of the CT scan.
We retrospectively reviewed patients with major torso injuries in our institution. The characteristics of the patients who received different diagnostic modalities (PXR only, CT scan only, or both) were investigated and compared. The characteristics of patients who underwent transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for the hemostasis of pelvic fracture-related retroperitoneal hemorrhage were also analyzed.
There were 726 patients enrolled in current stud. Only 72.0% (523/726) of the patients who had major torso injuries were examined using PXRs, and 69.6% (505/726) of the patients underwent an abdominal/pelvic CT scan. For the patients who were examined using PXRs, there was no significant difference in the usage rate of an additional CT scan between the patients with positive (52.7%, 108/205) and negative (61.0%, 194/318) PXR examinations (P = .070). Four patients underwent TAE immediately following PXR examinations only, without a CT scan. These four patients had unstable pelvic fractures on the PXR examination and significantly a lower systolic blood pressure (61.0 ± 13.0 mmHg), a lower revised trauma score (3.560 ± 2.427), a greater requirement for blood transfusions (1750 ± 957.2 ml) than the patients who underwent TAE after a CT scan.
For the management of patients with major torso injuries, the role of PXR is diminishing due to the development of the CT scan. However, the PXR is still valuable for patients who are in critical condition and have an obviously high probability of retroperitoneal hemorrhaging.
骨盆 X 射线(PXR)可作为评估骨盆骨折和稳定性的有效筛查工具。然而,对于有严重躯干损伤的患者,还应考虑和评估相关的腹腔/腹膜后器官损伤和出血。腹部/骨盆计算机断层扫描(CT)可能比 PXR 提供更高的分辨率和更多的信息。在本研究中,在 CT 扫描发展的背景下,阐述了常规 PXR 的作用。
我们回顾性分析了我院有严重躯干损伤的患者。研究了接受不同诊断方式(仅 PXR、仅 CT 扫描或两者都有)的患者的特征,并进行了比较。还分析了接受经导管动脉栓塞术(TAE)治疗骨盆骨折相关腹膜后出血止血的患者的特征。
本研究共纳入 726 例患者。仅有 72.0%(523/726)有严重躯干损伤的患者接受了 PXR 检查,69.6%(505/726)的患者进行了腹部/骨盆 CT 扫描。对于接受 PXR 检查的患者,PXR 检查阳性(52.7%,108/205)和阴性(61.0%,194/318)患者中,进一步行 CT 扫描的使用率无显著差异(P =.070)。有 4 例患者仅在 PXR 检查后立即行 TAE,未行 CT 扫描。这些患者在 PXR 检查中骨盆骨折不稳定,收缩压明显较低(61.0 ± 13.0mmHg),创伤修订评分较低(3.560 ± 2.427),需要输血较多(1750 ± 957.2ml),与行 CT 扫描后行 TAE 的患者相比。
对于有严重躯干损伤的患者,由于 CT 扫描的发展,PXR 的作用正在减弱。然而,对于病情危急且明显有腹膜后出血高概率的患者,PXR 仍然具有重要价值。